A randomised study on use of impedance cardiography for optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy

ISRCTN ISRCTN12205645
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12205645
Secondary identifying numbers version 1
Submission date
17/08/2006
Registration date
27/09/2006
Last edited
29/06/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Francisco Leyva
Scientific

Cardiology Department
Good Hope Hospital NHS Trust
Rectory Road
Sutton Coldfield
B75 7RR
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designNon-blinded randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA randomised study on use of impedance cardiography for optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy
Study objectivesWe hypothesise that the clinical benefits of cardiac resynchronisation therapy can be optimised by using impedance cardiography both at the time of biventricular pacemaker implantation and during follow up.
Ethics approval(s)Review scheduled for the next committee date of the North Birmingham Ethics Committee.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHeart failure
InterventionA total of 80 patients will be recruited to the study:
1. Arm A: impedence cardiography - 40 patients will be assessed using Impedence Cardiography (ICG) to optimise treatment.
2. Arm B: standard cardiography - 40 patients will be assessed using the usual optimisation methods.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureThe primary objective is to assess whether the clinical benefits of cardiac resynchronisation therapy can be optimised using ICG both at the time of pacemaker implantation and during follow up. The primary endpoint is improvement in six minute walking distance.
Secondary outcome measuresQuality of Life using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire.
Overall study start date30/09/2006
Completion date30/03/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants80 patients (40 to each arm)
Key inclusion criteria80 patients who are referred to the cardiology clinic and meet the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria for biventricular pacemaker implantation will be included in this study. The following inclusion criteria are:
1. Heart Failure
2. Moderate to severe function limitation New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, or NYHA class II heart failure plus a history of repeated admissions
3. Optimal tolerated treatment with diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta blockers, spironolactone and digoxin
4. QRS duration (representing the duration of ventricular depolarisation) more than or equal to 120 ms or evidence of mechanical Left Ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony
5. Left ventricular ejection fraction more than or equal to 40%
Key exclusion criteria1. Contraindications to cardiac pacing
2. Presence of comorbidities likely to threaten survival within 12 months
3. Pulmonary oedema requiring intravenous diuretics in the previous week
Date of first enrolment30/09/2006
Date of final enrolment30/03/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Cardiology Department
Sutton Coldfield
B75 7RR
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Good Hope Hospital NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research Department
Trust HQ
Rectory Road
Sutton Coldfield
B75 7RR
England
United Kingdom

Email dawn.richardson@goodhope.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/015hfw664

Funders

Funder type

Government

Application made to National Institute for Health Research Central Commissioning Facility (NIHR CCF) - Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results: 01/07/2011 Yes No

Editorial Notes

29/06/2016: Publication reference added