Evaluation of veteran-directed home and community based services on older veterans’ health care use and costs

ISRCTN ISRCTN12228144
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12228144
Secondary identifying numbers VA Boston Healthcare System IRB Protocol # 3069
Submission date
20/03/2017
Registration date
21/03/2017
Last edited
25/08/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
For the past 20 years, there has been a movement in the United States to move care out of nursing homes and other institutions and into the home or community for older adults with physical or cognitive (mental) limitations. One type of program that is designed to help individuals remain in their homes as long as possible is participant-directed services, where individuals are provided with monthly funds to purchase personal care services, medical equipment, or home modifications. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ version of this program is called Veteran Directed Home and Community Based Services (VD-HCBS). This program has been implemented in some Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and will be rolled out nationwide in the next three years. The aims of this study are to understand whether VD-HCBS reduces hospital admissions, emergency department admissions, nursing home admissions, and health care costs relative to usual care among veterans at risk for nursing home placement.

Who can participate?
VAMCs that have not started the VD-HCBS programs. The VD-HCBS program targets patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration who have physical or cognitive limitations and are at risk of a nursing home placement.

What does the study involve?
Medical centers are randomly allocated to when they begin enrolling patients in VD-HCBS. This program provides patients with more support for home care (provides modifications to their homes, provides medical equipment or supplies and allows them to choose a personal care worker). Sites that have VD-HCBS are compared to sites with the usual care, and by the end of the study period, all eligible VAMCs will have VD-HCBS programs. Healthcare use and costs for veterans with physical or cognitive limitations are also compared across VAMCs with and without the VD-HCBS programs.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Medical centers with VD-HCBS may have lower facility-wide rates of preventable hospital admissions, emergency department admissions, and nursing home admissions. There are no notable risks with participating.

Where is the study run from?
This study is being coordinated by the Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center (PEPReC) at the VA Boston Healthcare System (USA) and takes place in many VAMCs across the USA.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2015 to September 2020

Who is funding the study?
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (USA)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Melissa Garrido
peprec@va.gov

Contact information

Dr Melissa Garrido
Scientific

Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center
Boston VA Healthcare System
150 South Huntington Ave. Mail Stop 152H
Boston
02130
United States of America

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-8986-3536

Study information

Study designRetrospective observational trial
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet No participant information sheet available
Scientific titleEvaluation of Veteran-Directed Home and Community Based Services on older veterans’ health care use and costs: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial
Study acronymVD-HCBS
Study hypothesisThe availability of Veteran Directed Home and Community Based Services (VD-HCBS) will be associated with a reduction in hospital admissions, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions, and health care costs among older veterans with functional limitations.
Ethics approval(s)VA Boston Healthcare System IRB and R&D Committees, 02/02/2017, ref: Protocol # 3069
ConditionFunctional (needs assistance with 3 or more Activities of Daily Living) and/or cognitive limitations that place individuals at risk of nursing home placement
InterventionThe VD-HCBS program is a participant-directed program that enables veterans with functional or cognitive limitations to purchase care services in their homes. The goal of this program is to reduce these veterans’ risk of placement in a nursing home or other long-term care facility. Clinicians within the VA can refer patients to the VD-HCBS program, wherein the VA pays for services coordinated by Aging and Disability Network Agencies (ADNAs). Veterans receive a monthly allotment to pay for personal care workers of their own choosing (including family members), medical equipment or supplies, or modifications to the home. ADNA representatives work with veterans to identify and monitor care needs, facilitate purchasing of appropriate services or equipment, and to monitor spending.

As of December 2016, there are 78 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) not yet participating in the VD-HCBS program. GEC plans to roll the VD-HCBS program out nationally over a period of 3 years. At the beginning of each six-month period, GEC identifies a list of 14 VAMCs (sites) that are ready to begin offering VD-HCBS to veterans within the next six months. These sites are in the process of creating contract agreements with local ADNAs who work directly with the patients. The subset of sites are randomized to begin enrolling patients in VD-HCBS at month one or month four. This process is repeated every six months until the remaining VAMCs have implemented VD-HCBS.

Simple randomization in a stepped wedge approach like this is likely to lead to imbalance across sites that enroll patients at month 1 vs month 4 in important characteristics that may be associated with the outcomes of interest. Examples of such characteristics include facility case-mix and facility engagement in providing other Geriatrics and Extended Care (GEC) services to older veterans. Imbalance could occur because GEC is constrained in each six-month period to randomize start times for only about 14 VAMCs — those that are capable of enrolling patients within the next six months. Therefore, just by chance, those that are randomized to start in month 1 could be different in important ways than those randomized to a month 4 start.

To address this concern, covariate constrained randomization (also known as restricted randomization) is used to assign start times. This allows for better baseline balance on more potential confounders than simple randomization, matching, or stratification. From the VAMCs ready for participation each six month period, the full set of all potential variations in start times among them is evaluated and these combinations are ranked according to site characteristic balance. Site characteristics used in covariate constrained randomization includes sites’ percent of long-term services and supports (LTSS) expenditures going to HCBS, whether the site has a Community Living Center (CLC [nursing home]), market penetration of non-institutionalized care services among veterans 75 or older, urban/rural location, state participation in early participant-directed care initiatives, percent of state Medicaid LTSS expenditures going to HCBS, and case-mix for patients 75 and older (number of patients per site, mean Care Assessment Need (CAN) score (predicts 1-year mortality), mean Jen Frailty Index (based on VA data), and mean prospective VA data-based NOSOS score (measure of chronic disease burden). These characteristics are all likely to influence facility likelihood of referring patients to VD-HCBS and patient cost and utilization outcomes. For each combination, the difference between the month 1 facilities’ mean values of standardized variables and month 4 facilities’ mean values of standardized variables are calculated, squared, and summed to create a balancing score. Lower values of the balancing score indicate better covariate balance. From the combinations in the top 1% of covariate balance, one option is randomly selected.

The degree of follow up varies across different sites.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Any hospitalization is measured using administrative data collected by the VA Corporate Data Warehouse at 60-day increments for six months
2. Any emergency department visit is measured using administration data collected by the VA Corporate Data Warehouse at 60-day increments for six months
3. Nursing home admissions (VA community living center and contracted nursing homes) is measured using administrative data collected by the VA Corporate Data Warehouse at 60-day increments for six months
4. Total health care costs (VA, Medicare, Medicaid) are assessed using administration data collected by VA Corporate Data Warehouse data, Medicare data, and Medicaid data at 60-day increments for six months
Secondary outcome measures1. Frequency of hospitalisation is measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day increments for six months
2. Incidence and frequency of ambulatory care sensitive hospitalization is measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day incrementsfor six months
3. Costs attributed to HCBS measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day increments for six months
4. Costs attributed to nursing home stays are measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day increments for six months
5. Costs attributed to outpatient care are measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day increments for six months
6. Days at home (days not in an acute care setting or long-term care facility) are measured using administrative data collected by the VA, Medicare, and/or Medicaid at 60-day increments for six months
Overall study start date15/10/2015
Overall study end date01/09/2020

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants1800
Total final enrolment37407
Participant inclusion criteriaVAMC inclusion criteria (cluster level):
Site does not yet have an operational VD-HCBS program

VHA enrollee criteria (individual level)*:
1. Aged 75 and older
2. Jen Frailty Index (VA-data only) of 6 or higher
3. Had at least one inpatient or outpatient visit in the VHA system in the past year”
*Exact enrollee criteria will differ by site, as sites are allowed flexibility in choosing who to refer to the program
Participant exclusion criteriaVAMC criteria (cluster level)
1. Site has nearly completed readiness review and is unable to delay enrollment
2. Facility leadership not interested in implementing VD-HCBS program

VHA enrollee criteria (individual level)
There are no exclusion criteria for individual enrollment in VHA.
Recruitment start date22/03/2017
Recruitment end date29/02/2020

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United States of America

Study participating centre

Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center
Boston VA Healthcare System
150 South Huntington Ave. Mail Stop 152H
02130
Boston
02130
United States of America

Sponsor information

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development
Government

1100 1st Street NE
Suite 6
Washington DC
20002
United States of America

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05rsv9s98

Funders

Funder type

Government

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Department of Veterans Affairs, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Department, VA, USDVA
Location
United States of America

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date28/02/2021
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publications in high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available due to confidentiality reasons. Data will be stored on a secure server behind the Department of Veterans Affairs firewall.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2019 24/05/2020 Yes No
Protocol article 21/08/2017 25/08/2022 Yes No
Results article 13/01/2022 25/08/2022 Yes No

Editorial Notes

25/08/2022: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication references and total final enrolment added.
2. The study design was changed from 'Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial' to 'Retrospective observational trial'.
24/05/2020: Publication reference added.
23/03/2017: Recruitment date changed