Diagnosis of uterine anomalies using the new classification of ESHRE/ESGE

ISRCTN ISRCTN12592528
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12592528
Secondary identifying numbers AUTH 5867/29.03.2012
Submission date
01/04/2018
Registration date
14/06/2018
Last edited
25/04/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Congenital anomalies of the uterus (womb) are defects of uterus development and shape that occur during fetal life. Their prevalence is estimated to be 5%, but up to a quarter of women who have had miscarriages or preterm deliveries have such defects.
Uterine abnormalities are natural in some women, who do not know about it until they start trying for a pregnancy. Until then, they usually cause no problem at all.
Septate uterus is when the uterus is separated on the inside into two different halves by a septum (partition) of varying size and thickness, and is the most common of diagnosed anomalies. Thus there are two uterus cavities. It is thought that even a small septum may affect embryo implantation and early pregnancy as the divided structure is different compared to the normal uterus lining and cannot sustain implantation. The diagnosis is confirmed by imaging studies, such as hysterosalpingography (a type of xray) 2D or 3D ultrasonography (ultrasound scan) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
Most uterine abnormalities can be diagnosed by means of hysteroscopy/laparoscopy which are procedures using a narrow telescope with a light and camera at the end (called a hysteroscope) to examine the inside of the uterus. These help the doctor examine the uterine cavity and the outer shape of the uterus.
Hysteroscopy offers the advantage that the patient can be diagnosed and treated (removal of the septate) at the same time, but its disadvantage is that it is a surgical procedure.
This study aims to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D US) compared to hysteroscopy/laparoscopy.

Who can participate?
Adult women of reproductive age with suspected uterine malformations

What does the study involve?
All participants have a medical interview and clinical examination, 2D and 3D ultrasound and surgical procedures (hysteroscopy and laparoscopy) to diagnose and classify any uterine abnormalities.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Τhe direct benefit of participating in the study is that women and particularly symptomatic women (with infertility, recurrent miscarriage) know exactly what their problem is and at the same time they can undergo the correction of the problem. Their participation in the study may result in information that will help others in the future.
There are no risks and side effects of the 3D ultrasound.

Where is the study run from?
Papageorgiou General Hospital (Greece)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2012 to March 2016

Who is funding the study?
Papageorgiou General Hospital (Greece)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Anna Kougioumtsidou (Scientific)

Contact information

Mrs Anna Kougioumtsidou
Scientific

3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki General Hospital "Ippokrateio"
49 Konstantinoupoleos Street
Thessaloniki
546 42
Greece

Study information

Study designProspective blind comparative cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleThree-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: A diagnostic accuracy study
Study objectivesTo estimate the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D US) compared with the gold standard of hysteroscopy / laparoscopy, in the investigation of uterine congenital anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Ethics approval(s)Committee of Bioethics and Deontology School of Medicine of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 28/06/2013, ref: AUTH Protocol No 49
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCongenital uterine anomalies
InterventionAll participants have a medical interview and clinical examination, 2D US and 3D US to diagnose and classify any uterine malformations according to ESHRE/ESGE classification of congenital anomalies of female genital tract.
They also have hysteroscopy and laparoscopy to diagnose and classify any uterine malformations according to ESGE/ESHRE classification.
Results of both diagnoses are compared for accuracy.
The participants are not followed up after the end of these assessments.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureThe accuracy of 3D US for the diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies is assessed by comparing these results to hysteroscopy and laparoscopy results
Secondary outcome measuresThe accuracy of 3D US for diagnosis according to the type of uterine congenital malformation is assessed by comparing results to hysteroscopy and laparoscopy results
Overall study start date01/01/2012
Completion date30/03/2016

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants64 women
Key inclusion criteria1. Women with suspected uterine malformations
2. A presumptive 2DUS diagnosis of any uterine anomaly
3. Reproductive age
Key exclusion criteria1. Pre-pubertal adolescents
2. Pregnancy
3. Menopause
4. Any presence of uterine fibroids
Date of first enrolment01/07/2013
Date of final enrolment31/12/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Greece

Study participating centre

Papageorgiou General Hospital
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki
56403
Greece

Sponsor information

Papageorgiou General Hospital
Hospital/treatment centre

Ring Road
Municipality Pavlos Melas
N. Efkarpia
Thessaloniki
56403
Greece

Phone +30 231 332 3131
Email info@papageorgiou-hospital.gr
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01663qy58

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Papageorgiou General Hospitall, Thessaloniki, Greece

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/11/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr. Anna Kougioumtsidou, akougioum@gmail.com

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Basic results 25/05/2018 25/04/2019 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN12592528_BasicResults_25May18.pdf
uploaded 25/04/2019

Editorial Notes

25/04/2019: The basic results of this trial have been uploaded as an additional file.