The Release Trial: a randomised trial of umbilical vein oxytocin versus placebo for the treatment of retained placenta.

ISRCTN ISRCTN13204258
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13204258
Secondary identifying numbers LWH 0481
Submission date
13/09/2004
Registration date
01/10/2004
Last edited
18/12/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr Andrew Weeks
Scientific

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Liverpool Women's Hospital
Crown Street
Liverpool
L8 7SS
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)151 702 4240
Email aweeks@liv.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymRELEASE
Study objectivesThe injection of oxytocin down the umbilical vein has been proposed as a treatment for retained placenta. It can be performed by midwives in health centres and needs only the drug and a syringe. Its efficacy has been tested in a number of randomised trials with varying results. A recent meta-analysis by the Cochrane collaboration suggests that it is of borderline efficacy. However, the previous trials have used a wide variety of oxytocin doses as well as a method of injection that has been shown to deliver little of the oxytocin to the placental bed. The results of a recent observational study suggests that with higher oxytocin doses delivered through a tube passed up the umbilical vein, high success rates can be obtained. The results of a pilot study of 10 women, suggests that a dose of 50 IU in 30 ml saline may be effective at delivering the placenta.

A multi-centre randomised trial of this new method of umbilical vein injection is proposed. It will involve 572 women of over 34 weeks gestation with retained placenta of at least 30 minutes duration. The study centres will initially be Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool and the Jessop Wing, Sheffield. The trial will be double-blind and women with retained placenta who are not bleeding excessively will be randomised to receive either oxytocin (50 IU in 30 ml saline) or placebo. Women will be eligible for inclusion from 30 minutes post-delivery and the primary outcome measure will be the incidence of manual removal of placenta. Women will go for immediate manual removal if haemorrhage occurs or at 30 minutes following the oxytocin injection. A study involving 572 women will have 80% power to detect a 20% reduction in the relative risk of manual removal with 95% significance.

The hypothesis is that intra-umbilical injection of oxytocin reduces the incidence of manual removal compared with placebo in the treatment of retained placenta.

Please note that as of 14/09/2007 the details of this trial were updated by the Principal Investigator (see contact details). Most changes are noted with the date 14/09/2007. The following amendment has also been made:

Pakistan has been added to the list of countries of recruitment as of 14/09/2007
Ethics approval(s)1. Ethical approval was granted for the RELEASE trial on 24th June 2004 by the London Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee (reference MREC/03/2/075).
2. Local ethical approval has also been granted by the Pakistan and Uganda institutions involved.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRetained Placenta
InterventionEither 50 IU oxytocin or sterile water in 25 ml saline injected into the umbilical vein.

Please note the previous anticipated end date of this trial was 31/12/2007 (see hypothesis for details of this update).
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Oxytocin
Primary outcome measureManual removal of the placenta following randomisation
Secondary outcome measuresDrop in haemoglobin, measured blood loss, need for transfusion, need for surgery
Overall study start date01/12/2004
Completion date31/05/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants600 (572 as of 14/09/2007)
Key inclusion criteria1. 600 women with retained placenta for over 30 minutes
2. Written informed consent
3. Estimated gestation at least 34 weeks (or birth weight of 2 kg if gestation unknown)
4. Umbilical cord is clamped and cut
5. In the UK participants should be over 18 years of age, or over 16 and ‘Gillick competent’
6. In Uganda participants should be over 18
Key exclusion criteria1. Vaginal bleeding or maternal haemodynamic instability (Pulse >100 bpm or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) necessitating immediate placental removal
2. Torn umbilical cord making catheterisation impossible
3. Completely physiological third stage management (no cord cutting or clamping, no prophylactic oxytocics, no cord traction or fundal pressure)
4. Stillborn baby
Date of first enrolment01/12/2004
Date of final enrolment31/05/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Pakistan
  • Uganda
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Liverpool
L8 7SS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Liverpool Women's Hospital (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Crown Street
Liverpool
L8 7SS
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.lwh.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00eysw063

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

WellBeing (UK) (ref: W1/03)

No information available

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)/United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)/World Health Organization (WHO)/World Bank - Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) - Ugandan part of the trial (ref: A35026)

No information available

Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (Pakistan) - funding for the Pakistan arm of the trial (added 14/09/2007)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 01/10/2005 Yes No
Other publications experiences and lessons for gaining informed consent 11/05/2006 Yes No
Results article results 09/01/2010 Yes No