Intrauterine pressure monitoring for augmentation or induction of labour with intravenous oxytocin: benefits and costs

ISRCTN ISRCTN13667534
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13667534
Secondary identifying numbers NTR285
Submission date
20/12/2005
Registration date
20/12/2005
Last edited
29/01/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr J.J.H. Bakker
Scientific

Academic Medical Centre (AMC)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, H3-107
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Email j.j.bakker@amc.uva.nl

Study information

Study designMulticentre, randomised, single-blind, active controlled, parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleTo evaluate the effectiveness of the use of an IntraUterine Pressure Catheter (IUPC) in comparison to external monitoring of uterine activity during (I) augmentation after arrest of labor, or (II) induction of labour with intravenous oxytocin. Does the potentially more accurate monitoring of uterine activity with IUPC lead to a better outcome of labour and delivery in a study that randomises the use of an IUPC?
Study acronymThe IUPC study
Study objectivesOur hypothesis is that use of an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC), during augmentation or induction of labour with intravenous oxytocin, will reduce the number of instrumental deliveries from 25% to 16%.
Ethics approval(s)Received from the local medical ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPregnancy, labour
InterventionIntrauterine pressure monitoring with a catheter during labour versus external uterine activity monitoring (control group).
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Oxytocin
Primary outcome measureThe number of instrumental deliveries, i.e. caesarean sections and/or assisted vaginal delivery.
Secondary outcome measures1. The occurrence of neonatal admittance to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
2. Need for antibiotics by mother or child
3. Total amount of oxytocin used
4. Complications
5. Time to delivery and costs
Overall study start date01/07/2004
Completion date01/07/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants1350
Key inclusion criteriaWomen with the indication to induce labour or to stimulate the contractions with intravenous oxytocin in case of arrest of labour.
Key exclusion criteria1. Women with a history of caesarean section
2. Gestational age less than 36 weeks
3. Intrauterine foetal death
4. Breech presentation
5. Multiple pregnancy
6. Maternal age greater than 18 years
7. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B infection
8. Intrauterine infection
9. Contraindication for amniotomy
10. Participation in another randomised controlled trial
Date of first enrolment01/07/2004
Date of final enrolment01/07/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Academic Medical Centre (AMC)
Amsterdam
1100 DD
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Meibergdreef 9
Amsterdam
1105 AZ
Netherlands

Website http://www.amc.uva.nl/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03t4gr691

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 28/01/2010 Yes No