Comparison of the treatment effect of preservative-free vs preserved eye drops in patients with dry eye syndrome

ISRCTN ISRCTN13765551
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13765551
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
20/01/2014
Registration date
05/02/2014
Last edited
17/02/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Eye Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Studies show that preservatives in eye drop can trigger an inflammatory response. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report comparing the effects of preservative-free and preserved eye drops in dry eye syndrome. This study compares the antioxidants and inflammatory responses in tears of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with preservative-free eye drops versus eye drops with preservatives.

Who can participate?
21 years of age and over and diagnosed with dry eye syndrome.

What does the study involve
Participants were randomly allocated to receive either preservative-free eye drops or eye drops with preservatives. Various assessments will be carried out at the start of the study and at 1, 2 and 3 months after treatment.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Both preservative-free and preserved eye drops treatments may lead to significant improvement in symptoms of dry eye. There is no risk to participants.

Where is the study run from?
Bucheon St Mary's Hospital, South Korea.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started in September 2012 and ran until December 2013.

Who is funding the study?
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

Who is the main contact?.
Professor Eun Chul Kim

Contact information

Prof Eun Chul Kim
Scientific

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
#2, Sosa-Dong, Wonmi-Gu
Bucheon, Kyungki-Do
Bucheon
420-717
Korea, South

Study information

Study designRandomized comparative clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleComparison of antioxidant and inflammatory cytokine activities in tears of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with preservative-free vs preserved eye drops
Study objectivesDry eye syndrome is recognized as a highly prevalent inflammatory disease of the lacrimal functional unit caused by multifactorial reasons. Increase of the oxidative stress status in the conjunctiva of Sjogren syndrome patients appears to have a role in the pathogenesis of dry eye disease. Preservatives in eye drops can induce oxidative stress and inflammatory response in conjunctival epithelial cells and the rabbit dry eye model.
Ethics approval(s)Institutional Review Board at the Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, 21/08/2013
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedDry eye syndrome
InterventionPermuted blocks were obtained using a computer-based random code generator (Research Randomizer; http://randomizer.org/).

50 patients (Group 1) were treated four times with preservative-free 0.1% sodium hyaluronate and 0.1% fluorometholone for the first month and preservative-free 0.1% sodium hyaluronate and 0.05% cyclosporine for the second and third month.

50 patients (Group 2) were treated four times with preserved 0.1% sodium hyaluronate and preserved 0.1% fluorometholone for the first month and preserved 0.1% sodium hyaluronate and 0.05% cyclosporine for the second and third month.

Following instillation of the eye drops, symptoms and signs of dry eye are measured.

Total duration of treatment and follow-up for each study arm: 3 months
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI)
2. Corneal fluorescein staining
3. Schirmer tear test (without anesthesia)
4. Tear film break-up time (tBUT)
5. Symptom score of dry eye
6. Impression cytology

Measured at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months.
Secondary outcome measuresAntioxidant and Inflammatory cytokine activities in tears measured by ELISA at baseline, 1, 2 and 3 months.
Overall study start date01/09/2012
Completion date01/12/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participantsGroup 1 (50 patients) was treated with preservative-free eye drops and group 2 (50 patients) was treated with preserved eye drops.
Key inclusion criteriaEligible patients were at least 21 years of age and had a diagnosis of dry eye syndrome refractory to conventional management. Inclusion criteria were:
1. Schirmer test (without anesthesia) of 5 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye
2. Low tear film break-up time (tBUT) (<5 seconds)
3. Mild superficial punctate keratitis, defined as a corneal punctate fluorescein staining score of ≥1 in either eye (scale 0 [none] to 3 [severe]); and one or more moderate (≥2) dry eye related symptoms, including itching, burning, blurred vision, foreign body sensation, dryness, photophobia, soreness, or pain.
Key exclusion criteriaPatients were excluded if they had:
1. A history of any ocular disorder including injury, infection, non-dry-eye ocular inflammation, trauma, or surgery within the prior 6 months
2. Were receiving concurrent treatment that could interfere with interpretation of the study results
3. Had any uncontrolled systemic disease or significant illness; or were pregnant, lactating, or considering becoming pregnant.
4. Patients could be discontinued before the completion of the study because of adverse events, pregnancy, protocol violations, lack of efficacy, or administrative or personal reasons.
Date of first enrolment01/09/2012
Date of final enrolment01/12/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Korea, South

Study participating centre

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
Bucheon
420-717
Korea, South

Sponsor information

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital (Korea, South)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Eun Chul Kim
#2, Sosa-Dong, Wonmi-Gu
Bucheon, Kyungki-Do
Bucheon
420-717
Korea, South

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01fpnj063

Funders

Funder type

Government

The National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (Korea, South)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan