The role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed
ISRCTN | ISRCTN13977361 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13977361 |
IRAS number | 253510 |
Secondary identifying numbers | CPMS 41067, HTA 17/76/06, IRAS 253510 |
- Submission date
- 01/04/2019
- Registration date
- 17/04/2019
- Last edited
- 15/01/2024
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Other
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
There are growing numbers of children living in England who require to be fed through a tube directly into the stomach (gastrostomy). The current professional recommendations in England are that formula feeds should be used when children are fed by gastrostomy, but there are growing numbers of parents who are choosing to feed their own children a more conventional diet of home-blended foods. This study aims to address a research gap by assessing the symptom profile (reflux, constipation, pain) and quality of life of children who are gastrostomy fed, comparing those who are formula fed and those who are predominantly fed a home-blended diet. The study will also examine the impact on parents’ quality of life and explore costs to the families and the NHS.
Who can participate?
Children aged between 6 months and 18 years old (inclusive) who have a gastrostomy for nutritional purposes
What does the study involve?
There are two phases in this study.
Phase 1 involves interviews with parents and young people, and group discussions with health professionals, to explore the different diets that children receive and the resources (e.g. time, cost) associated with gastrostomy feeding. The study also identifies which outcomes (e.g. quality of life, complications with feeding, healthcare use) are the most important to measure for children with a gastrostomy, and how to measure these. The findings are used to decide what information should be collected from children and their families in phase 2.
Phase 2 is a study of children who are gastrostomy fed, some of who receive the recommended formula feeds and some of who receive a diet of home-blended foods. Information is collected from this group of children and their parents at the beginning of the study, and then again at 9 and 18 months, to compare the outcomes for children who receive formula feeds with those who receive home-blended feeds.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits associated with taking part in this study. However, this study will provide important evidence about the risks and benefits associated with these different diets, which will be used to improve the advice and support that is available to families, and also healthcare staff who support them. There is no risk to children who take part in this study because they are not asked to change their diet or the way they are fed, or to keep things the same if their feeding needs to change. It is possible that some parents who take part in the study experience distress as a result of talking about their child’s gastrostomy, and the study team will ensure appropriate support is available.
Where is the study run from?
The study is being run by Dr Lorna Fraser and a team of researchers based in the Department of Health Sciences at the University of York. Families will be recruited from NHS services throughout England who provide nutritional care for children and young people with a gastrostomy.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
February 2019 to July 2023
Who is funding the study?
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Julia Hackett, julia.hackett@york.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Health Sciences
University of York
Heslington
York
YO10 5DD
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1904 321679 |
---|---|
julia.hackett@york.ac.uk |
Scientific
Cicely Saunders Institute
King’s College London
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1904 321889 |
---|---|
lorna.fraser@kcl.ac.uk |
Scientific
Department of Health Sciences
Area 2 Seebohm Rowntree Building
University of York
Heslington
York
YO10 5DD
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1904 321347 |
---|---|
mark.oneill@york.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Exploratory sequential mixed methods design |
---|---|
Primary study design | Observational |
Secondary study design | Cohort study |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Quality of life |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | The role of different diets in children who are gastrostomy fed; an exploratory sequential mixed methods study |
Study objectives | What are the risks, benefits and resource implications for using home-blended food for children with gastrostomy tubes compared to currently recommended formula feeds? Objectives: 1. To identify the important outcomes of gastrostomy feeding for parents, young people and health professionals 2. To assess the safety of home-blended diets for children who are gastrostomy fed compared to liquid formula diets 3. To identify and quantify the benefits of home-blended diets compared to liquid formula diets for children who are gastrostomy fed and their parents 4. To identify and quantify the resources (family and statutory services) required to support home-blended diets compared to liquid formula diets 5. To assess whether long-term follow-up of children who are gastrostomy fed is feasible using routine data sources |
Ethics approval(s) | Approved 20/03/2019, Yorkshire & The Humber - Leeds West Research Ethics Committee (NHSBT Newcastle Blood Donor Centre, Holland Drive, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4NQ; Tel: +44 (0)207 104 8086; Email: nrescommittee.yorkandhumber-leedswest@nhs.net), ref: 19/YH/0028 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Children who are gastrostomy fed |
Intervention | Stage 1: Interviews of parents (n=20) of children who are gastrostomy fed, young people (n=5-10) who are gastrostomy fed, and relevant healthcare professionals (n=24-32) including paediatrician, dietitians and community nurses. The researchers will ask participants to identify important outcomes for children with a gastrostomy (e.g. symptoms, quality of life, safety, complications) and also explore the best way to measure these outcomes in this study. Stage 2: 300 children who are gastrostomy fed and their parents will be recruited from children’s health services and followed up for 18 months during which time the outcomes identified from stage 1 will be measured. Detailed clinical information (e.g. diagnosis, medications) will also be collected from the child’s paediatrician and dietitian. The safety and risk of complications will be examined by asking parents about visits to A&E and hospital and also by examining hospital records. At the end of the study the researchers will compare the different outcomes, symptoms, complications, and costs between children who are formula fed and those who are mainly fed blended food. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Gastrointestinal symptoms measured using the PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptoms module at baseline, 9 and 18 months |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Child health-related quality of life measured using the PedsQL Generic module at baseline, 9 and 18 months 2. Parent health-related quality of life measured using the EQ5D-5L at baseline, 9 and 18 months 3. Dietary intake measured using parent-reported food diaries and using the MyFood24 dietary assessment tool at baseline, 9 and 18 months 4. Anthropometric measurements (weight, height/length, body mass index, mid upper arm circumference, multiple skin folds) measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months 5. Healthcare usage (appointments with paediatric and dietetic teams, emergency hospital admissions, GP attendance, A&E visits) measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months 6. Safety (parent-reported tube blockages, A&E or hospital visits to unblock or replace the gastrostomy device, gut or stoma site infections and antibiotics prescribed for these) measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months 7. Resource use (cost of feeds, including dietetic resources, cost of equipment to prepare feeds, time to prepare and administer feeds) measured at baseline, 9 and 18 months Outcomes are subject to change based on the results of phase 1 of the study |
Overall study start date | 01/02/2019 |
Completion date | 31/07/2023 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Mixed |
---|---|
Age group | Mixed |
Lower age limit | 6 Months |
Upper age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | Workstream 1: 20 parents, 5-10 young people, 24-32 health professionals; Workstream 2: 300 children and their parents (n=600 participants) |
Total final enrolment | 567 |
Key inclusion criteria | Workstream 1: 1. Parents of children and young people (aged 6 months up to 18 years) who are fed via a gastrostomy 2. Young people aged 12-18 years currently using a gastrostomy and with no significant cognitive impairments 3. Health professionals, specifically paediatricians, dietitians, children’s community nurses, and Speech and Language Therapists Workstream 2: Children (aged 6 months - 18 years inclusive) who receive all or part of their nutrition via gastrostomy tube, and their parent/guardian |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Children with a temporary gastrostomy 2. Infants up to 6 months and young people who are 19 years and older 3. Non-residents of England |
Date of first enrolment | 01/03/2019 |
Date of final enrolment | 30/10/2021 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
Kayll Road
Sunderland Tyne and Wear
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom
Poole
BH15 2JB
United Kingdom
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Birmingham
B4 6NH
United Kingdom
Mytton Oak Rd
Shrewsbury
SY3 8XL
United Kingdom
Meadow Lane
St. Ives
PE27 4LG
United Kingdom
Holt Street
Birmingham Science Park
Aston
Birmingham
B7 4BN
United Kingdom
Bordesley Green East
Birmingham
B9 5ST
United Kingdom
Shrewsbury
SY3 8XQ
United Kingdom
Union Walk
Hereford
HR1 2ER
United Kingdom
Russells Hall Hospital
Pensnett Road
Dudley
DY1 2HQ
United Kingdom
Shrub Hill Industrial Estate
Worcester
WR4 9RW
United Kingdom
8 Victoria Road
Leeds
LS6 1PF
United Kingdom
Mallard Court
Express Park
Bristol Road
Bridgwater
TA6 4RN
United Kingdom
Highpoint Venue
Bursledon Road
Southampton
SO19 8BR
United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Freeman Road
High Heaton
Newcastle Upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
United Kingdom
Guy's Hospital
Great Maze Pond
London
SE1 9RT
United Kingdom
Bristol
BS48 1PE
United Kingdom
York
YO10 5DD
United Kingdom
Harrogate
North Yorkshire
HG2 7SX
United Kingdom
Elm Grove
Brighton
BN2 3EW
United Kingdom
Wolverhampton Road
Heath Town
Wolverhampton
WV10 0QP
United Kingdom
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Steeton
Keighley
West Yorkshire
BD20 6TD
United Kingdom
Duckworth Lane
Bradford
West Yorkshire
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Witham Park
Waterside South
Lincoln
Lincolnshire
LN5 7JH
United Kingdom
Anlaby Road
Hull
HU3 2JZ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
Heslington Hall
York
YO10 5DD
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1904328693 |
---|---|
michael.barber@york.ac.uk | |
https://ror.org/04m01e293 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 31/12/2023 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
Publication and dissemination plan | 1. Peer reviewed scientific journals 2. Conference presentation 3. Publication on website 4. NIHR funder report |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available due to being unable to share the linked healthcare data which is important in the analyses. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol file | version v1.1 | 05/03/2019 | 17/04/2019 | No | No |
Protocol article | protocol | 09/10/2019 | 10/10/2019 | Yes | No |
Protocol file | version v1.3 | 21/04/2020 | 02/02/2021 | No | No |
Other publications | qualitative findings | 10/04/2021 | 21/05/2021 | Yes | No |
Protocol file | 20/04/2021 | 21/05/2021 | No | No | |
Protocol file | version 1.4 | 20/04/2021 | 02/03/2023 | No | No |
HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No | ||
Results article | 21/12/2023 | 27/12/2023 | Yes | No | |
Interim results article | 10/11/2023 | 15/01/2024 | Yes | No | |
Plain English results | 15/01/2024 | 15/01/2024 | No | Yes |
Additional files
- ISRCTN13977361_PROTOCOL_v1.1_05Mar19.pdf
- Uploaded 17/04/2019
- ISRCTN13977361_PROTOCOL_v1.3_21Apr20.pdf
- Uploaded 02/02/2021
- ISRCTN13977361_PROTOCOL_20Apr21.pdf
- Uploaded 21/05/2021
- ISRCTN13977361_PROTOCOL_V1.4_20Apr21.pdf
- ISRCTN13977361_PlainEnglishResults.pdf
Editorial Notes
15/01/2024: Publication reference and plain English results added.
27/12/2023: Publication reference added.
21/09/2023: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The IRAS number was added.
2. The intention to publish date was changed from 30/09/2023 to 31/12/2023.
01/08/2023: The following changes have been made:
1. The intention to publish date has been changed from 31/07/2023 to 30/09/2023.
2. The final enrolment number has been changed from 242 to 567.
02/03/2023: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Protocol uploaded (not peer reviewed).
2. Contact details updated.
3. Total final enrolment added.
18/10/2021: A scientific contact was added.
21/05/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 30/06/2021 to 31/10/2021.
2. The overall trial end date has been changed from 31/07/2022 to 31/07/2023.
3. Publication reference added.
4. The total final enrolment number has been added from the reference.
5. Uploaded protocol version 1.4, 20 April 2021 (not peer reviewed).
17/02/2021: The recruitment end date has been changed from 28/02/2021 to 30/06/2021.
02/02/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. Uploaded protocol version 1.3, 21 April 2020 (not peer reviewed).
2. The trial participating centres "York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust", "Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust", and "Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust" have been removed.
3. The trial participating centre has been changed from "South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust" to "Shropshire Community Health NHS Trust".
4. The trial participating centres "Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust", "Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust", "Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust", "Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust", "Airedale NHS Foundation Trust ", "Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust", "Lincolnshire Community Health Services NHS Trust", and "Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust" have been added.
07/08/2020: The recruitment end date has been changed from 31/07/2020 to 28/02/2021.
01/07/2020: The recruitment has resumed.
17/04/2020: Due to current public health guidance, recruitment for this study has been paused.
10/10/2019: Publication reference added, trial website address updated.
17/04/2019: Uploaded protocol Version 1.1, 5 March 2019 (not peer reviewed).
15/04/2019: Trial's existence confirmed by the NIHR.