Doxycycline to improve filarial lymphedema (LEDoxy Ghana)

ISRCTN ISRCTN14042737
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14042737
Secondary identifying numbers TAKeOFF-4-0117
Submission date
10/07/2017
Registration date
17/07/2017
Last edited
03/12/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Current plain English summary as of 25/11/2021:
Background and study aims
Lymphatic filariasis is a parasitic disease caused by microscopic, thread-like worms that infect the lymph system, resulting in fluid collection and swelling (lymphedema). Current lymphedema treatment is based on the use of simple measures of hygiene (regular washing with soap and water, skin and nail care), use of topical antibiotics or antifungal agents, exercise and footwear. This is considered the "standard of care" and has been shown to reduce the frequency of acute attacks that drive the progression of lymphedema. In two previous studies doxycycline 200 mg was given to patients with lymphedema for 6 weeks. This oral antibiotic treatment led to improvement or halt of the progression of the lymphedema in most of the treated patients despite active infection with worms that cause lymphatic filariasis. In order to expand the benefits of this observation to more people affected by this disease, similar studies are needed to confirm the earlier results so that doxycycline treatment can be introduced into current treatment programmes. This study takes place in Ghana and is one of five studies that have the aim to confirm the effect of doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks. The other four studies are carried out in Mali, Sri Lanka, India and Tanzania. While the three studies in Mali, Sri Lanka and India compare doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks versus a placebo (dummy drug) matching doxycycline (both treatments on top of standard methods of hygiene), the two studies in Ghana and Tanzania have the additional aim to find out whether a lower dose of doxycycline of 100 mg is equally beneficial.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 14 – 65 with a lymphedema of the leg

What does the study involve?
Participants with lymphedema stage 1-3 are randomly allocated to be treated with either doxycycline 200 mg, doxycycline 100 mg or a placebo for 6 weeks, and participants with lymphedema stage 4-6 are randomly allocated to receive doxycycline 200 mg or a placebo for 6 weeks. All treatments are given in addition to the standard methods of hygiene and mass drug administration (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg) in areas where this is still ongoing. At the start of the study and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months later, participants undergo measurements of the leg. A questionnaire about the occurrence of acute attacks is carried out every 2 months after treatment onset. Participants also undergo lymphedema management training at the start of the study and after 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
All people who were were seen by the team at study start (those who received treatment and those who had to be excluded) will be asked to consent to an additional follow-up around three years after treatment start which will consist of similar procedures as the follow-up after 24 months. In addition, we will ask some questions related to COVID-19. All participants will receive another round of lymphedema management training including the necessary supplies.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits to the participant include thorough medical evaluation, intensified hygiene training, free supplies for local care of lymphedema and free medical treatment for common illnesses during the treatment period and follow-up. The risks to participants are side effects caused by the licensed study drug doxycycline and infection during blood sampling. In the event of side effects caused by the study drugs or treatments, participants are treated and followed up by the research team until they are resolved.

Where is the study run from?
Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR) (Ghana)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2017 to August 2020

Who is funding the study?
Research Networks for Health Innovations in Sub-Saharan Africa sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Alexander Yaw Debrah
yadebrah@yahoo.com


Previous plain English summary:
Background and study aims
Lymphatic filariasis is a parasitic disease caused by microscopic, thread-like worms that infect the lymph system, resulting in fluid collection and swelling (lymphedema). Current lymphedema treatment is based on the use of simple measures of hygiene (regular washing with soap and water, skin and nail care), use of topical antibiotics or antifungal agents, exercise and footwear. This is considered the "standard of care" and has been shown to reduce the frequency of acute attacks that drive the progression of lymphedema. In two previous studies doxycycline 200 mg was given to patients with lymphedema for 6 weeks. This oral antibiotic treatment led to improvement or halt of the progression of the lymphedema in most of the treated patients despite active infection with worms that cause lymphatic filariasis. In order to expand the benefits of this observation to more people affected by this disease, similar studies are needed to confirm the earlier results so that doxycycline treatment can be introduced into current treatment programmes. This study takes place in Ghana and is one of five studies that have the aim to confirm the effect of doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks. The other four studies are carried out in Mali, Sri Lanka, India and Tanzania. While the three studies in Mali, Sri Lanka and India compare doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks versus a placebo (dummy drug) matching doxycycline (both treatments on top of standard methods of hygiene), the two studies in Ghana and Tanzania have the additional aim to find out whether a lower dose of doxycycline of 100 mg is equally beneficial.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 14 – 65 with a lymphedema of the leg

What does the study involve?
Participants with lymphedema stage 1-3 are randomly allocated to be treated with either doxycycline 200 mg, doxycycline 100 mg or a placebo for 6 weeks, and participants with lymphedema stage 4-6 are randomly allocated to receive doxycycline 200 mg or a placebo for 6 weeks. All treatments are given in addition to the standard methods of hygiene and mass drug administration (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg) in areas where this is still ongoing. At the start of the study and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months later, participants undergo measurements of the leg. A questionnaire about the occurrence of acute attacks is carried out every 2 months after treatment onset. Participants also undergo lymphedema management training at the start of the study and after 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits to the participant include thorough medical evaluation, intensified hygiene training, free supplies for local care of lymphedema and free medical treatment for common illnesses during the treatment period and follow-up. The risks to participants are side effects caused by the licensed study drug doxycycline and infection during blood sampling. In the event of side effects caused by the study drugs or treatments, participants are treated and followed up by the research team until they are resolved.

Where is the study run from?
Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR) (Ghana)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2017 to August 2020

Who is funding the study?
Research Networks for Health Innovations in Sub-Saharan Africa sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Alexander Yaw Debrah
yadebrah@yahoo.com

Contact information

Dr Alexander Yaw Debrah
Public

Faculty of Allied Health Sciences
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
Kumasi
00000
Ghana

Phone +233 (0)3220 60351
Email yadebrah@yahoo.com
Prof Achim Hoerauf
Scientific

Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology
University Hospital of Bonn
Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25
Bonn
53105
Germany

Phone +49 (0)228 28715673
Email achim.hoerauf@ukbonn.de

Study information

Study designMulti-national interventional randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Home
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet.
Scientific titleDoxycycline 200 mg/d vs 100 mg/d for 6 weeks to improve filarial lymphedema: a multi-national, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
Study acronymTAKeOFF - LEDoxy
Study objectivesGroup A (LE stage 1-3):
1. To confirm the efficacy of a 6-week course of daily doxycycline 200 mg on lack of progression of filarial lymphedema (LE)
2. To reduce the dosage of doxycycline from 200 mg/d to 100 mg/d for 6 weeks for the treatment of filarial LE

Group B (LE stage 4-6):
1. To show efficacy of a 6-week course of daily doxycycline 200 mg on lack of progression of filarial LE
Ethics approval(s)Current ethics approval as of 25/11/2021:
1. Approved 24/10/2017; approval for first amendment: 13/04/2018; approval for 3 year-follow up 10/11/2021; The Committee for Human Research, Publication and Ethics (CHRPE) of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) (Kumasi, Ghana), ref: CHRPE/AP/535/21
2. Approved 13/12/2017; approval for first amendment: 31/05/2018; The Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC), Accra, Ghana
3. Approved 15/02/2018; approval for first amendment: 18/06/2018; The Ghana Food and Drug Authority (Ghana FDA), Accra, Ghana
4. Approved 06/12/2017; approval for first amendment: 08/05/2018; approval for 3 year-follow up 05/11/2021; The Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn (Bonn, Germany), ref: 325/21


Previous ethics approval:
1. The Committee for Human Research, Publication and Ethics (CHRPE) of the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana: approval for first submission: 24/10/2017; approval for first amendment: 13/04/2018
2. The Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (GHS-ERC), Accra, Ghana: approval for first submission: 13/12/2017; approval for first amendment: 31/05/2018
3. The Ghana Food and Drug Authority (Ghana FDA), Accra, Ghana: approval for first submission: 15/02/2018; approval for first amendment: 18/06/2018
4. The Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany: approval for first submission: December 6, 2017; approval for first amendment: 08/05/2018
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLymphatic filariasis (LF)
InterventionCurrent intervention as of 25/11/2021:
The study involves daily observed treatment with either doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks, doxycycline 100 mg for 6 weeks or placebo matching doxycycline for 6 weeks (42 days). Participants with lymphedema stage 1-3 will be randomized (block randomisation) to one of the three treatment regimens, participants with lymphedema stage 4-6 will receive either doxycycline 200 mg or placebo matching doxycycline.
1. DOX 200: doxycycline 200 mg/d for 6 weeks (2 100 mg tablets/day orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)
2. Placebo (control): placebo matching doxycycline for 6 weeks (2 tablets/day orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)
3. DOX 100 (additional arm for group A [LE stage 1-3]): doxycycline 100mg/d for 6 weeks (1 tablet 100 mg doxycycline/day plus 1 tablet placebo matching doxycycline orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)

Treatment will be administered ad personam by the trial clinician directly in the villages in the form of daily observed treatment (DOT). All treatment regimens will be administered on top of the standardized methods of hygiene ("standard of care") and on top of standard mass drug administration (MDA; ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg) in areas where MDA is still ongoing. Treatment will be carried out in a blinded manner, meaning that neither the patients nor the caregiver will know to which treatment arm the patients belong.

At baseline as well as 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment onset, participants will undergo lymphedema-specific measurements (circumference measurements of the leg, volume measurement of the legs. A questionnaire regarding the occurrence of acute attacks (ADLA) will be carried out every 2 months after treatment onset. Participants will also undergo lymphedema management training at baseline and after 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Around three years after treatment onset, participants who consent in a separate form will again undergo lymphedema-specific measurements (staging, circumference measurements of the leg, volume measurement of the legs). A questionnaire regarding the occurrence of acute attacks (ADLA) and about hygiene and lymphedema management will be carried out. Participants will also be asked about symptoms related to COVID-19 and their history of infection and vaccination with SARS-CoV-2. Blood and urine will only be sampled from participants who were included in the trial for treatment. Participants will also undergo another lymphedema management training.



Previous intervention as of 03/08/2018:
The study involves daily observed treatment with either doxycycline 200 mg for 6 weeks, doxycycline 100 mg for 6 weeks or placebo matching doxycycline for 6 weeks (42 days). Participants with lymphedema stage 1-3 will be randomized (block randomisation) to one of the three treatment regimens, participants with lymphedema stage 4-6 will receive either doxycycline 200 mg or placebo matching doxycycline.
1. DOX 200: doxycycline 200 mg/d for 6 weeks (2 100 mg tablets/day orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)
2. Placebo (control): placebo matching doxycycline for 6 weeks (2 tablets/day orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)
3. DOX 100 (additional arm for group A [LE stage 1-3]): doxycycline 100mg/d for 6 weeks (1 tablet 100 mg doxycycline/day plus 1 tablet placebo matching doxycycline orally) on top of standard MDA (ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg once a year)

Treatment will be administered ad personam by the trial clinician directly in the villages in the form of daily observed treatment (DOT). All treatment regimens will be administered on top of the standardized methods of hygiene ("standard of care") and on top of standard mass drug administration (MDA; ivermectin 200 µg/kg plus albendazole 400 mg) in areas where MDA is still ongoing. Treatment will be carried out in a blinded manner, meaning that neither the patients nor the caregiver will know to which treatment arm the patients belong.

Current as of 03/08/2018:
At baseline as well as 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment onset, participants will undergo lymphedema-specific measurements (circumference measurements of the leg, volume measurement of the legs. A questionnaire regarding the occurrence of acute attacks (ADLA) will be carried out every 2 months after treatment onset. Participants will also undergo lymphedema management training at baseline and after 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.

Previous:
At baseline as well as 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset, participants will undergo lymphedema-specific measurements (circumference measurements of the leg, volume measurement of the legs, ultrasound measurement of the skin thickness at the ankles). A questionnaire regarding the occurrence of acute attacks (ADLA) will be carried out every 2 months after treatment onset. Participants will also undergo lymphedema management training at baseline and after 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase II
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Doxycycline, ivermectin, albendazole
Primary outcome measureCurrent primary outcome measure as of 25/11/2021:
Lack of progression of LE (stage reduction or same stage as pre-treatment using the 7-point scale staging according to Dreyer et al, 2002), examined at 24 and 36 months


Previous primary outcome measure:
Lack of progression of LE (stage reduction or same stage as pre-treatment using the 7-point scale staging according to Dreyer et al, 2002), examined 24 months after treatment onset
Secondary outcome measuresCurrent secondary outcome measures as of 25/11/2021:
1. Lack of progression of LE (stage reduction or same stage as pre-treatment using the 7-point scale staging according to Dreyer et al., 2002), examined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
2. Improvement of LE, i.e. stage reduction (at least one stage compared to pre-treatment), examined at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months
3. Change of LE stages (reduction or increase) compared to baseline, assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
4. Changes (reduction or increase) of the circumference of the affected limbs compared to baseline circumferences, measured by tape measure at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
5. Changes in the circumference of the affected limbs compared to baseline circumferences, measured with an infrared scanner (LymphaTech®) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
6. Changes of the volume of the affected limbs compared to baseline volume, measured with an infrared scanner (LymphaTech®) at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
7. Changes in the duration of acute attacks compared to pre- treatment, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
8. Changes in the frequency of acute attacks compared to pre-treatment, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
9. Absence of acute attacks, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
10. Changes of the hygiene level compared to pre-treatment, assessed by using a hygiene survey especially developed for this study at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
11. Changes of the quality of life (QoL) compared to pre-treatment, assessed using the 12-item version of the WHODAS 2.0 at 12, 24, and 36 months
12. Levels of angiogenic, lymphangiogenic, pro-fibrotic or pro-inflammatory biomarkers (such as VEGF, CECAM-a, MMPS) in blood and/or urine as a measure for prognostic effects, measured using ELISA and/or Luminex Multiplex Assay technique at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
13. T cell activation and differentiation markers in the blood such as HLADR, Ki67 and CD38 (activation), PD-1, CTLA-4, Eomes (exhaustion), CD45RA, CD27, CCR7 (differentiation) on CD4 and CD8 T cells, assessed using unstimulated whole blood which will be added to fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies that specifically detect the above mentioned factors. The percentage of positive cells is measured using flow cytometry at baseline, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
14. Symptoms related to COVID-19 and history of infection and vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 assessed using participant questions at 36 months

Assessment of safety:
Adverse events (AE) assessed and described in the scope of the daily observed treatment (DOT). This involves: a) occurrence of AE, b) intensity of AE (Grade 0 [none], Grade 1 [mild], grade 2 [moderate] grade 3 [severe], c) SAE, d) relation to treatment (definite, probable, possible, remote, not related), e) outcome of AE (restored, improved, unchanged, deteriorated, death, unknown, overcome with sequelae, f) intervention


Previous secondary outcome measures:
1. Lack of progression of LE (stage reduction or same stage as pre-treatment using the 7-point scale staging according to Dreyer et al., 2002), examined 6, 12 or 18 months after treatment onset
2. Improvement of LE, i.e. stage reduction (at least one stage compared to pre-treatment), examined 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment onset
3. Change of LE stages (reduction or increase) compared to baseline, assessed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment onset
4. Changes (reduction or increase) of the circumference of the affected limbs compared to baseline circumferences, measured by tape measure at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
5. Changes of skin thickness of the affected limbs compared to baseline values, measured by ultrasound at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset (outcome measure removed as of 03/08/2018)
6. Changes of the circumference of the affected limbs compared to baseline circumferences, measured with an infrared scanner (LymphaTech®) at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
7. Changes of the volume of the affected limbs compared to baseline volume, measured with an infrared scanner (LymphaTech®) at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
8. Changes in the duration of acute attacks compared to pre- treatment, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
9. Changes in the frequency of acute attacks compared to pre-treatment, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
10. Absence of acute attacks, as assessed with a questionnaire every two months after treatment onset and evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
11. Changes of the hygiene level compared to pre-treatment, assessed by using a hygiene survey especially developed for this study at 6, 12 and 24 months
12. Changes of the quality of life (QoL) compared to pre-treatment, assessed using the 12-item version of the WHODAS 2.0 at 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
13. Levels of angiogenic, lymphangiogenic, pro-fibrotic or pro-inflammatory biomarkers (such as VEGF, CECAM-a, MMPS) in blood and/or urine as a measure for prognostic effects, measured using ELISA and/or Luminex Multiplex Assay technique at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset
14. T cell activation and differentiation markers in the blood such as HLADR, Ki67 and CD38 (activation), PD-1, CTLA-4, Eomes (exhaustion), CD45RA, CD27, CCR7 (differentiation) on CD4 and CD8 T cells, assessed using unstimulated whole blood which will be added to fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies that specifically detect the above mentioned factors. The percentage of positive cells is measured using flow cytometry at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment onset

Assessment of safety:
Adverse events (AE) assessed and described in the scope of the daily observed treatment (DOT). This involves: a) occurrence of AE, b) intensity of AE (Grade 0 [none], Grade 1 [mild], grade 2 [moderate] grade 3 [severe], c) SAE, d) relation to treatment (definite, probable, possible, remote, not related), e) outcome of AE (restored, improved, unchanged, deteriorated, death, unknown, overcome with sequelae, f) intervention
Overall study start date01/01/2017
Completion date20/08/2020

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupMixed
SexBoth
Target number of participantsGroup A (LE stage 1-3): n = 360, Group B (LE stage 4-6): n = 60
Total final enrolment420
Key inclusion criteria1. Lymphedema of at least one leg grade 1-6 measured on a 7-point scale [3]
2. Age ≥ 14 years and ≤ 65 years
3. Men or non-pregnant women. If women of childbearing-potential, they must use an approved, effective method of contraception (including abstinence) before, during and for at least 2 weeks after the completion of the active intervention with doxycycline or placebo
4. Negative pregnancy test
5. Body weight ≥ 40 kg
6. Resident in LF endemic area for ≥ 2 years
7. Able and willing to give informed consent/ to provide assent to participate in the trial
8. Ability to use established standardized methods of hygiene and effectively applying it prior to the initiation of the drug treatment
Key exclusion criteria1. No lymphedema or lymphedema stage 7
2. Age < 14 years or > 65 years
3. Body weight < 40 kg
4. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
5. Women of childbearing potential not using an agreed method of contraception (including abstinence; oral contraceptives are not allowed because of interaction with trial drugs)
6. Clinical or biologic evidence of hepatic or renal dysfunction or disease of the central nervous system (CNS)
7. Evidence of severe comorbidities except for features of filarial disease
8. Alcohol or drug abuse
9. History of adverse reactions to doxycycline or other tetracyclines
10. Any significant condition (including medical and psychological/ psychiatric disorder) which in the opinion of the study investigator might interfere with the conduct of the study
11. History of photosensitivity reactions after taking drugs.
12. Concomitant medication with antacids containing aluminium, magnesium or sucralfate and not able to discontinue
13. Concomitant medication with other antibiotics than doxycycline and not able to discontinue
14. Concomitant medication with diuretics or sulfonylurea
15. Concomitant medication with coumarin
16. Haemoglobin < 8 gm/dL
17. Neutrophil count <2000/mm3 - Updated 03/08/2018: Neutrophil count < 1100/mm3
18. Platelet count <100 000/mm3
19. Creatinine > 2 times upper limit of normal
20. AST (GOT) > 2 times upper limit of normal
21. ALT (GPT) > 2 times upper limit of normal
22. Gamma-GT > 2 times upper limit of normal
23. Positive urine pregnancy test
Date of first enrolment12/03/2018
Date of final enrolment21/07/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Ghana

Study participating centre

Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR)
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
Kumasi
00000
Ghana

Sponsor information

Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR)
Research organisation

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
Kumasi
00000
Ghana

Website http://kccr-ghana.org/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/032d9sg77

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Research Networks for Health Innovations in Sub-Saharan Africa sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/04/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planThe publication of the study results is planned in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available as consent was not provided for this.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 30/03/2020 02/04/2020 Yes No
Results article 01/10/2024 03/12/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

03/12/2024: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The participant level data sharing statement was added.
19/01/2023: The following changes have been made:
1. The overall trial end date has been changed from 31/12/2021 to 20/08/2020.
2. The intention to publish date was changed from 31/12/2021 to 30/04/2023.
25/11/2021: The following changes have been made:
1. The overall trial end date has been changed from 20/08/2020 to 31/12/2021.
2. The ethics approval has been updated.
3. The intervention has been updated.
4. The primary outcome measure has been updated.
5. The secondary outcome measures have been updated.
6. The plain English summary has been updated.
01/12/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/12/2020 to 20/08/2020.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
02/04/2020: Publication reference added.
03/08/2018: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The ethics approval details were added.
2. The interventions, secondary outcome measures and exclusion criteria were updated.
3. The overall trial end date was changed from 30/06/2020 to 31/12/2020.
4. The recruitment start date was changed from 01/11/2017 to 12/03/2018.
5. The recruitment end date was changed from 31/05/2018 to 21/07/2018.