Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Pakistan has one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the world, with 260 deaths per 100,000 live births. Punjab is the largest province, where 56% of the total population of Pakistan lives. Rural health centers (RHCs) are a critical component of emergency care during pregnancy and are where 59% of all deliveries in the province take place. Households choose to deliver at the RHCs due to financial and cultural reasons. In many cases, these facilities are not well prepared to provide this care. The aim of this study is to find out whether increasing knowledge about emergency care services for pregnant women can help to reduce maternal death rates.
Who can participate?
All maternal care health workers and all pregnant women at participating facilities.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to receive two study conditions in a random order, six months apart. The first condition involves health workers taking part in a one-day refresher workshop to provide them with basic training. The second condition involves the refresher workshop with the addition of mentoring visits through post graduate doctors. These visits involve onsite discussions and demonstration of emergency obstetric care methods. Participants in both groups are followed up for 12 months through reviewing clinical management notes compiled from monthly facility records.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Maternal care health workers in treatment groups benefit from receiving training that could help them provide better emergency care in the future. Pregnant women who take part may benefit from an improved standard of care. There are no notable risks involved with participating.
Where is the study run from?
The study is run from King Edward Medical University and takes place in 72 health facilities in rural areas (Pakistan)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2013 to April 2017
Who is funding the study?
International Food Policy Research Institute (USA)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Musharraf Cyan
cyan@gsu.edu
Trial website
Contact information
Type
Public
Primary contact
Dr Musharraf Cyan
ORCID ID
Contact details
Georgia State University
14 Marietta St. NW
551
Atlanta
30300
United States of America
+1 404 413 0244
cyan@gsu.edu
Additional identifiers
EudraCT number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
H14055
Study information
Scientific title
Priming rural facilities for optimal service delivery
Acronym
Study hypothesis
The aim of this study is to test that whether an intervention to prime rural health facilities by institutionalizing readiness protocols for emergency obstetric care through training visits by postgraduate trainee physicians offers an affordable solution for strengthening the backbone of maternal care during childbirth in rural Pakistan.
Ethics approval
Susan Laury Experimental Economics Center, Shelia L. White Office of Research Integrity, Georgia State University, 18/12/2014, ref: 331304
Study design
Randomised cross over trial
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised cross over trial
Trial setting
Hospitals
Trial type
Treatment
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Condition
Maternal health
Intervention
Participants are randomized to receive the two study conditions in a random order using a randomization command in Stata. All the participating facilities are randomly assigned to eight groups and two time periods. All participants in a facility receive the treatment exposure or control treatment assigned to the facility. Groups are balanced with 9 facilities in each group. During time period 1, the first 6 months of the study, facilities in Groups 1, 2 and 3 receive 6 visits (1 monthly mentoring visit for 6 months) , 3 visits (1 mentoring visit once in 2 months), and 1 mentoring visit at the start of the time period, respectively. Facilities in Group 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 do not receive any mentoring visit during the first 6 months. At 6 months, Groups 5, 6 and 7 are exposed to treatment while Groups 1, 2 and 3 move into control. Facilities in Group 5, 6 and 7 receive 6, 3 and 1 mentoring visit during time period 2. Facilities in Group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 8 are not exposed to mentoring visits in time period 2.
Control: Participants undergo basic training of health care workers. This involves a one-day refresher workshop on EmoC conducted by OBGYN specialists.
Intervention: Participants undergo the same basic training of health care workers as the control group, with the addition of mentoring visits through post graduate doctors. These visits involve onsite discussions and demonstration of EmOC methods.
Follow up takes place after 12 months and involves review of clinical management notes compiled from monthly facility records.
Intervention type
Supplement
Phase
Drug names
Primary outcome measure
Rate of application of emergency obstetric care management options is assessed by reviewing clinical management notes from baseline to 12 months.
Secondary outcome measures
1. Rate of application of appropriate diagnosis is assessed by reviewing clinical management notes from baseline to 12 months
2. Usage of parental antibiotics is assessed by reviewing clinical management notes from baseline to 12 months
3. Usage of uterotonic drugs is assessed by reviewing clinical management notes from baseline to 12 months
4. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) scores are assessed by reviewing clinical management notes at 6 and 12 months
Overall trial start date
01/06/2013
Overall trial end date
30/04/2017
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. All maternal care health workers in the 72 health facilities
2. All pregnant women who applied to the 72 health facilities
Participant type
Health professional
Age group
Adult
Gender
Both
Target number of participants
1. 360 health workers 2. 25920 pregnant women
Participant exclusion criteria
1. No pregnant women attending rural health facilities
2. Women attending health facilities for ANC visits
3. Health workers at the health facilities not tasked with maternal care and/or EmOC services
Recruitment start date
01/03/2014
Recruitment end date
28/02/2015
Locations
Countries of recruitment
Pakistan
Trial participating centre
King Edward Medical University
Nelagumbad Mayo Hospital Road
Lahore
54000
Pakistan
Sponsor information
Organisation
Georgia State University
Sponsor details
33 Gilmer St SE
Atlanta
30302
United States of America
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
Organisation
King Edward Medical University
Sponsor details
Nelagumbad
Mayo Hospital Road
Lahore
54000
Pakistan
+92 42 99211145
info@kemu.edu.pk
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
Organisation
Georgia State University
Sponsor details
Sponsor type
Not defined
Website
Funders
Funder type
Research organisation
Funder name
International Food Policy Research Institute
Alternative name(s)
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Location
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Planned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal in 2-3 months after the trial end date.
IPD Sharing plan:
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Mushrarraf Rasool Cyan (cyan@gsu.edu)
Intention to publish date
30/08/2017
Participant level data
Available on request
Basic results (scientific)
Publication list