Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
An inguinal hernia is a common condition in which part of the abdominal wall bulges through a weakened abdominal (tummy) wall. To prevent the intestines from becoming trapped, it is necessary to surgically reinforce the abdominal wall. This is usually done using an artificial mesh made from a material called polypropylene. If you compare this to a weakened tire of a bike, it can be imagined that the inner tire bulges out through the weakened outer tyre: the mesh can be sewn on the outer tire (Lichtenstein technique) or it position the mesh in between the inner and outer tire so that the pressure of the inner tire keeps the mesh (without the need for fixation) in position (TREPP method). The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two techniques and to find out which causes less pain after surgery.

Who can participate?
Adults without any life-threathening diseases who have an inguinal hernia on one side.

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group undergo surgery and have the mesh sewn onto the outside of the abdominal wall (Lichtenstein technique) like an overlay, which is currently standard practice. Those in the second group have the mesh placed on the inside of the abdominal wall (TREPP method). Participants are have their level of pain and general health assessed at the start of the study and then again after 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. The cost effectiveness of the two methods is also calculated and compared.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits or risks for those participating in this study compared to any other hernia repair operations taking place outside of the study.

Where is the study run from?
Medical Center Leeuwarden (Netherlands)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2016 to December 2019

Who is funding the study?
1. The Adriaan Metius Foundation (Netherlands)
2. Surgical Cooperation Friesland (Netherlands)
3. Medical Center Leeuwarden (Netherlands)

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr Giel G Koning (scientific)
2. Professor JPEN Pierie (scientific)

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Dr G.G. Koning


Contact details

Department of Surgery
Medical Center Leeuwarden
Henri Dunantweg 2
8901 BR
+31 582866070



Additional contact

Prof JPEN Pierie


Contact details

Department of Surgery
Medical Center Leeuwarden
Henri Dunantweg 2
8901 BR
+31 582866070

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number


Study information

Scientific title

Protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing the Trans REctussheath PrePeritoneal repair (TREPP) versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia


The TREPPoLi Trial

Study hypothesis

Inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP technique results in less patients with chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) compared to Lichtenstein's technique.

Ethics approval

Not provided at time of registration

Study design

Multi-centre double-blind randomised parallel trial

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised parallel trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet


Primary unilateral inguinal hernia


Following provision of informed consent, participants are randomised to one of two groups.

Group 1: Participants undergo inguinal hernia repair according to the TREPP technique. To reach the preperitoneal space (PPS), a 5 cm transverse incision is made approximately 1 cm cranial to the pubic bone. The anterior rectus sheath is opened by transverse incision. After retraction of the muscle fibers medially, the inferior epigastric vein and artery are identified and retracted medially. The underlying transverse fascia is opened transversely as well. With a gentle movement, the PPS is dissected and a medial hernia may be reduced immediately. Using the iliac vessels as a landmark, the funiculus is identified with the spermatic cord, the testicular vessels and a possible lateral hernia. The latter (if present) may now be reduced. Using three long and thin retractors, a perfect overview of the PPS may be achieved and all possible hernia orifices (medial, lateral and/or femoral) can be visualized. The soft mesh is positioned in the PPS and covers the complete myopectineal orifice of Fruchaud. After deployment, the abdominal pressure keeps the mesh in position, without the necessity of any fixation. The anterior rectus sheath and the fascia of Scarpa are closed with Vicryl.

Group 2: Participants undergo inguinal hernia repair according to Lichtenstein's technique via anterior approach with a skin incision two centimetres above the Poupart ligament. The Lichtenstein technique will be adapted to present-day insights; a soft mesh will be used instead of the ‘heavy’ polypropylene mesh. The mesh will be positioned as onlay (or ‘inlay’, as it is, basically, positioned IN the inguinal canal). The skin will be closed the same way as the TREPP technique, using an intracutaneous technique with a resorbable wire.

The surgery will be between 15 and 45 minutes estimated for both techniques (TREPP and Lichtenstein). Preferably spinal anesthesia will be used in both groups (if the patient is choosing general anesthesia this is, of course, provided). A physical exam will be done for every evaluation of numbness of the operation area; questionnaires are filled in (e.g. SF-36, EuroQol 5D, pain disability index) after 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.

Intervention type



Drug names

Primary outcome measures

Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) is measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in combination with the proposed Quantitative sensory testing (QST) at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year.

Secondary outcome measures

1. Health status is measured using the Short Form 36 (SF-36), EuroQol5D (EQ-5D), Carolina comfort scale and Pain Disability index and a physical examination at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year
2. Cost-effectiveness of the interventions is completed by calculating all direct and/or indirect costs (hospital and societal related costs) at 12 months (this means: at the end of the trial, once the last patient fulfilled the final visit)

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Aged 18 years and over
2. ASA classification 1-3
3. Symptomatic primary unilateral inguinal hernia

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants

2 groups of 480 patients

Participant exclusion criteria

1. Previous preperitoneal operations (e.g. prostatectomy, Caesarean section)
2. Bilateral hernias
2. Recurrent hernias
4. Incarcerated hernias (acute)
5. Inadequate mental state and/or IQ limitations to answer questionnaires
6. Mental disorders (DSM V)

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment


Trial participating centre

Medical Center Leeuwarden
Medical Center Leeuwarden Department of Surgery Henri Dunantweg 2
8901 BR

Sponsor information


Medical Center Leeuwarden

Sponsor details

Henri Dunantweg 2
8901 BR

Sponsor type

Hospital/treatment centre



Funder type


Funder name

The Adriaan Metius Foundation

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Funder name

Surgical Cooperation Friesland

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Funder name

Medical Center Leeuwarden

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype


Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

All data (benefit and harm outcomes) will be published in peer reviewed journals, at least indexed in PubMed. The protocol of this trial will be published with all its complete details in the near future, after all the requirements (ethics approval, internal- and external audits completed, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) check list points) are obtained.

Intention to publish date


Participant level data

Available on request

Results - basic reporting

Publication summary

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

24/08/2016: The target number of participants has been updated from 750 to 960. 08/08/2016: Internal review