Is early colonoscopy in patients with acute rectal blood loss better than standard colonoscopy?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN14530195 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14530195 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | 12-101 |
- Submission date
- 26/06/2017
- Registration date
- 26/07/2017
- Last edited
- 01/03/2021
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Rectal blood loss is a frequently encountered medical condition and often requires in-hospital treatment. To determine the cause of blood loss, an endoscopic (a procedure that uses a camera attached on a thing long tube to see in the inside of the body) examination of the large intestine is usually performed (this is called a colonoscopy). Presently, there is not enough scientific evidence for the benefits of early colonoscopy (this is a colonoscopy within 24 hours after admission to the hospital), compared to colonoscopy within 1-3 days for patients with rectal blood loss. Possible advantages are a shorter stay in the hospital, less blood loss, earlier diagnosis of the cause of the blood loss and (if possible) earlier treatment of the underlying cause. The aim of this study is to examine the possible benefits of early colonoscopy.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 18 and older who have had a bloody bowel movement within 24 hours who come to the hospital
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group receive the standard colonoscopy done within 24-72 hours of presenting at the hospital. Those in the second group receive a colonoscopy within 24 hours of presenting at the hospital. The colonoscopies are performed the same in each group. Participants are hospitalised after the procedure to monitor for blood loss. They are discharged according to the hospital’s protocols. Participants attend a follow up visit where they are assessed for readmissions to the hospital, complications, and the yield of colonoscopy
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from receiving a quicker colonoscopy. There are no risks with participating in this study. Colonoscopy has a slight risks for bleeding (<5%) and perforation (0.001%) in the large bowel.
Where is the study run from?
Haaglanden Medical Centre (Netherlands)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2012 to April 2015
Who is funding the study?
Haaglanden Medical Centre (Netherlands)
Who is the main contact?
Ms Inge van Rongen
Contact information
Public
Haaglanden Medical Center
Lijnbaan 32
The Hague
2501 CK
Netherlands
Study information
| Study design | Single centre non-blinded randomised controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Diagnostic |
| Participant information sheet | ISRCTN14530195_PIS_26Jul17_V1.pdf |
| Scientific title | Early versus standard colonoscopy: A randomised controlled trial in patients with acute lower gastro-intestinal bleeding |
| Study acronym | BLEED study |
| Study objectives | Early colonoscopy will decrease length of hospital stay. |
| Ethics approval(s) | METC Zuid-West Holland (Medical Ethical Committee South West Holland), 25/02/2013, ref: 12-101 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Gastroenterology |
| Intervention | Patients presenting at the emergency department with acute hematochezia are consecutively included in the trial when they had an indication for clinical colonoscopy, according to the Dutch Guideline ‘Bleedings of the gastrointestinal tract’. Participants are randomised 1:1 in parallel groups to either early colonoscopy (within 24 hours) or standard colonoscopy (within 24-72 hours). In case of a suspected upper source of bleeding, patients underwent an upper endoscopy first. When an upper bleeding source was excluded, they are randomised. If an upper bleeding source was confirmed, patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and are not eligible for the trial. An online randomisation programme is used (ALEA, designed by the Clinical Trial Centre Maastricht, The Netherlands), based on minimisation and including the stratification factors age (18-60 years and >60 years) and gender. For both groups, colon preparation was performed using a polyethylene glycol-based solution. Group 1: Participants in this group receive the colonoscopy within 24 hours. They have their bowel preparation done as soon as possible after inclusion in the study. If they are unable to drink (e.g. due to nausea or swallowing disorders) a nasogastric tube was placed. Group 1: Participants in this group receive the standard colonscopy within 24-72 hours. When necessary, a nasogastric tube is placed. All colonoscopies are performed by either one of the gastroenterologists (seven in total) in the Haaglanden Medical Centre or one of the residents in training for gastroenterology (under supervision of a gastroenterologist). According to hospital protocol, all colonoscopies were performed with sedation using a combination of midazolam 5 mg/ml i.v. (Dormicum® , Roche B.V., Woerden, The Netherlands) and fentanyl 0.05 mg/ml i.v. (Hameln Pharma Plus GmbH, Hameln, Germany), dose depending on age and comorbidity. The in-hospital treatment and discharge criteria are similar in both groups and in accordance with the hospital protocol. Once a participant is stabilized (hemodynamically stable, no visible active bleeding anstable hemoglobin level), they could be discharged from hospital. Participants are followed for one month. The follow up comprised a visit to one of the gastroenterologists at the outpatient department, according to hospital protocol. If a participant does not attend the follow up visit, due to various reasons, the patient chart was retrospectively addressed to obtain data on readmissions and mortality. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure | Hospital length of stay (in days) is measured calculated using the date and time of admission to hospital and the date and time of hospital discharge. |
| Secondary outcome measures | 1. The yield of colonoscopy, defined as diagnosing either a confirmed or presumptive source of bleeding and treatment if feasible is obtained from electronic patient charts (colonoscopy reports) 2. The number of packed red blood cells is obtained from the electronic patient charts 3. Information on readmissions and the reason for readmission (rectal blood loss) is obtained from the electronic patient chart 4. Information on complications are obtained from the electronic patient chart 5. 30 day mortality is obtained from the electronic patient chart |
| Overall study start date | 14/09/2012 |
| Completion date | 14/04/2015 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 132 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged 18 years or over 2. Last bloody bowel movement within 24 hours of presentation 3. Ability to provide informed consent 4. No suspicion of or exclusion of an upper gastrointestinal bleeding source |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Known or suspected acute ischemic bowel, perforation or peritonitis 2. Hemodynamic instability refractory to resuscitation 3. Coagulopathy refractory to correction 4. Documented pregnancy 5. Serious comorbidities that would preclude the use of colonoscopy in standard clinical practice (i.e. severe COPD, severe cardiovascular comorbidity) 6. Decreased level of consciousness. |
| Date of first enrolment | 08/05/2013 |
| Date of final enrolment | 14/03/2015 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Netherlands
Study participating centre
2501 CK
Netherlands
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
Lijnbaan 32
The Hague
2501 CK
Netherlands
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/00v2tx290 |
|---|
Funders
Funder type
Research council
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 30/06/2017 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high impact peer reviewed journal |
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Ms. I. van Rongen, i.vanrongen@haaglandenmc.nl or inge.van.rongen@gmail.com |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | version V1 | 26/07/2017 | 26/07/2017 | No | Yes |
| Results article | results | 01/09/2019 | 29/01/2019 | Yes | No |
Additional files
- ISRCTN14530195_PIS_26Jul17_V1.pdf
- Uploaded 26/07/2017
Editorial Notes
01/03/2021: Internal review.
29/01/2019: Publication reference added.
