Efficacy of a new head lice treatment based on silicon oil

ISRCTN ISRCTN15117709
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15117709
Secondary identifying numbers CAAE - 1422.0.000.040-06 179/06
Submission date
02/05/2008
Registration date
12/05/2008
Last edited
16/10/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Jorg Heukelbach
Scientific

Departamento de Saúde Comunitária
Faculdade Medicina
Rua Prof. Costa Mendes 1608, 5. andar
Fortaleza
60430-140
Brazil

Study information

Study designRandomised, controlled, observer-blinded clinical trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleEfficacy of a pediculicide based on dimeticone: randomised observer-blinded comparative trial in patients with severe infestation
Study acronymDIMPED (DIMeticone for the treatment of PEDiculosis)
Study objectivesThe efficacy against head lice infestation of a product containing a high (92%) concentration of the silicon oil dimeticone (similar to Nyda®) is similar or superior to a product containing 1% permethrin.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Ethical Review Board of the Federal University of Ceará (Brazil) on the 14th September 2006 (ref: 179/06). Registered in the database of the Brazilian Ministry of Health for studies involving human subjects (“Sistema Nacional de Informações Sobre Ética em Pesquisa envolvendo Seres Humanos” [SISNEP]), accessible under http://portal.saude.gov.br/sisnep/pesquisador/ (project no: 1422.0.000.040-06).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedActive head lice infestation
InterventionParticipants were recruited from a poor urban neighbourhood in Brazil where head lice are highly prevalent. To minimise reinfestation during the trial, study participants were transferred to a holiday resort outside the endemic area for a period of nine days.

Participants were randomised to receive either topical treatment with a product containing a high percentage of dimeticones (92%), equivalent in composition to Nyda® (G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG, Hohenlockstedt, Germany), or topical permethrin 1% aqueous solution (Kwell®, GlaxoSmithKline, Brazil). Two topical applications were done, seven days apart. Participants were treated immediately upon arrival at the resort (day 1) and, a second time seven days later (day 8) to kill newly hatched lice from eggs which may have survived the first treatment.

The products were used according to the producers' recommendations. The fine tooth comb provided by both producers together with the pediculicide was not used after the topical application of the products. The dimeticone-based product was applied to dry hair and then left to dry naturally. After eight hours the hair was washed with a commercial shampoo not containing dimeticones. Kwell® was applied to wet hair, left for 30 minutes and thereafter washed out in an identical manner as the other product. Both products were applied systematically onto the hair from the hair shafts to the tips, and a normal comb was used to spread the liquids evenly.

The dimeticon-based product (in composition similar to Nyda® , G. Pohl-Boskamp GmbH & Co. KG, Hohenlockstedt, Germany) was prepared at the Department of Pharmacy of the Federal University of Ceará by an experienced pharmacist, the permethrin product bought locally at a pharmacy.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Dimeticone product equivalent in composition to Nyda®, topical permethrin
Primary outcome measureThe primary outcome measure was defined as the proportion of participants cured of head lice infestation one, six and eight days after the first treatment (i.e. days 2, 7 and 9, respectively). Cure was defined as the complete absence of viable lice on the scalp, as determined by wet combing with a high quality plastic head louse comb.
Secondary outcome measures1. Reduction of clinical pathology: days 1 (before intervention), 2, 4, 7 and 9
2. Reduction of the degree of itching (assessed based on a pre-tested ordinal Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] ranging from 0 to 4): days 1 (before intervention), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9
3. Cosmetic acceptability of the products, assessed using a summary score ranging from -4 (extremely negative) to +4 (extremely positive), with a standardised questionnaire including subjective assessment of smelling, irritation of scalp, cosmetic changes of hair, and changes in the easiness to comb the hair: days 2, 4, 7 and 9
4. Safety (number and type of adverse events). Clinical pathology included the presence of erythema, papules, excoriations, eczema, secondary infection and enlarged cervical or retro-auricular lymph nodes: days 2, 4, 7 and 9 (and continuous documentation when any adverse event [AE] occurred, indendent from timepoints).
Overall study start date02/01/2007
Completion date31/01/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit5 Years
Upper age limit15 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants146 children and adolescents
Key inclusion criteria1. Children aged 5 - 15 years, either sex
2. An active head lice infestation (one or more active head lice found after three minutes of visual inspection)
3. Written consent obtained from study participants and carers
Key exclusion criteria1. Use of head lice products, anthelminthics, or antibiotics within the previous four weeks
2. Severe skin disorders of the scalp (such as generalised impetigo, eczema, psoriasis or chronic dermatitis of unknown origin)
3. Bleached or colour treated hair within the previous four weeks
4. Known sensitivity to any ingredients in the products
5. Mental disease
6. Drug abuse
7. Pregnant or lactating girls
8. Unwillingness to stay for nine days in a holiday resort outside the endemic area where the clinical trial would be carried out
9. Participation in another clinical study in the previous month
Date of first enrolment02/01/2007
Date of final enrolment31/01/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Brazil

Study participating centre

Departamento de Saúde Comunitária
Fortaleza
60430-140
Brazil

Sponsor information

Mandacaru Foundation (Brazil)
Research organisation

Rua José Vilar de Andrade 257
Fortaleza
60833-830
Brazil

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05h876969

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Mandacaru Foundation (Brazil)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Results: 10/09/2008 Yes No