The effects of six months of progressive high effort resistance training methods upon strength, body composition, function, and wellbeing of elderly adults

ISRCTN ISRCTN15170767
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15170767
Secondary identifying numbers SportsMedLandau2012-12-001
Submission date
06/04/2017
Registration date
17/05/2017
Last edited
17/05/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Aging is associated with decline in physical function and so regular physical activity is recommended for older adults. In particular there is significant loss of strength and muscle mass and so 'muscle strengthening activities' such as resistance training are often recommended. An important factor in determining the success of resistance training programs might be the intensity of effort during training. However, this can be difficult for many individuals to accomplish, particularly if unsupervised. The aim of this study is to look at the effectiveness of a supervised resistance training program hat progressively introduces higher effort training over a period of 6 months in older adults.

Who can participate?
Adults aged 60 years and over who are in good health and have not previously engaged in resistance training.

What does the study involve?
All participants take part in supervised resistance training sessions twice a week for six months. In these sessions, participants perform a 10 minute warm up, followed by completing exercises using gym equipment such as a keg press or chest press. The number of reps and load (weight) is gradually increased over the course of the program. At the start of the study, after the program (six months) and then again six months later, participants have their strength, body composition, wellbeing and function assessed using a range of assessment tasks.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants benefit from being able to take part in supervised resistance training intervention, free for six months, which may results in improvements in strength, body composition, wellbeing, and function. The potential risks include injury or other complications as a result of the exercise program.

Where is the study run from?
University of Koblenz-Landau (Germany)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
June 2012 to January 2014

Who is funding the study?
University of Koblenz-Landau (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
1. Dr James Steele (scientific)
james.steele@solent.ac.uk
2. Dr Jürgen Giessing (scientific)
giessing@uni-landau.de

Contact information

Dr James Steele
Scientific

Southampton Solent University
E Park Terrace
Southampton
SO14 0YN
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-6013-8402
Phone +44 2382 016465
Email james.steele@solent.ac.uk
Dr Jürgen Giessing
Scientific

Institute of Sport Science
University of Koblenz-Landau
Rhabanusstraße 3
Mainz
76829
Germany

Phone +49 6341 280-31289
Email giessing@uni-landau.de

Study information

Study designProspective non-randomised study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised study
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeOther
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleIn elderly adults does a progressive high effort resistance training intervention produce improvements in strength, body composition, function, and wellbeing, and are these maintained over a 6 month follow-up?
Study objectivesA six month supervised progressive high effort resistance training intervention will significantly improve strength, body composition, function, and wellbeing of elderly adults, and these improvements will be maintained in those continuing with unsupervised training during a six month follow up compared with those ceasing training.
Ethics approval(s)Institute of Sport Science, University of Koblenz-Landau, Germany, 25/04/2012
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedExercise
InterventionAll participants take part in supervised training sessions conducted twice a week (at least 48 hours between sessions) for six months (25 weeks).

Participants all perform a general warm-up using either treadmill, cross-trainer, upright cycle ergometer, or recumbent cycle ergometer depending on preference for 10 minutes followed by a single set of moderate load leg press, chest press, and seated row for 15 repetitions prior to each training session. In each training session participants perform leg press, chest press, seated row, knee extension, knee flexion, trunk extension, and trunk flexion. The order of exercises is not fixed and depends upon preference and availability of equipment in the gym where training is conducted. Rest between exercises lasts for 2-4 minutes. Participants are instructed to perform the exercises using a relatively long repetition duration of at least 2 seconds concentric, 1 second pause at the top of the range of motion, and 2 seconds eccentric, and to not exceed 4 seconds concentric, 1 second pause at the top of the range of motion, and 4 seconds eccentric.

The first two weeks of the intervention is a familiarisation phase whereby participants trained using a single set of each exercise using a moderate load and performing 15-18 repetitions i.e. nRM. After this period participants progress for a further 2 weeks to perform each exercise to a set end of point of sdRM defined as cessation at the point where participants predict they would reach momentary failure if the next repetition was attempted. After this period participants progress to perform each exercise to a set end point of MF and continued training in this manner until week 18.

For the final 6 weeks of the intervention participants progress to perform each exercise to set end point of MF followed by a drop set whereby the load was reduced by ~5 kg and an additional set continued to the point of MF was performed immediately upon completion of the first. Load is progressed for each group by 2-10% in the next session if participants could achieve greater than 12 repetitions before reaching the defined set end point for their current period of training (in the case of the final 6 weeks this applied to the first set performed to momentary failure).

After the 25-week intervention participants wishing to continue performing resistance training unsupervised are given access to the training facility and allowed to train without direct supervision.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureStrength (5 repetition maximum) is measured using leg press, chest press, and seated row exercises at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention) and 12 months (6 months follow up).
Secondary outcome measures1. Body composition is measured using bioelectrical impedance at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention) and 12 months (6 months follow up)
2. Wellbeing is measured using the WHO-% Wellbeing Index at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention) and 12 months (6 months follow up)
3. Function is measured using a stair climb, carrying task, chair rise and grip strength at baseline and 6 months (post-intervention)
Overall study start date01/06/2012
Completion date24/01/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Healthy volunteer
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants28
Key inclusion criteria1. At least 60 years of age
2. Present with a medical certificate verifying their otherwise good health
3. Not previously engaged in resistance training (RT)
4. No contraindication to participation in RT
Key exclusion criteriaParticipants were excluded if they had a pacemaker (due to the use of bioelectrical impedance analysis), failed to attend >4 training sessions, or did not meet the above criteria.
Date of first enrolment10/12/2012
Date of final enrolment21/12/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

University of Koblenz-Landau
Institute of Sport Science
Rhabanusstraße 3
Mainz
55118
Germany

Sponsor information

University of Koblenz-Landau
University/education

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of Koblenz-Landau

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/04/2017
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr James Steele (James.steele@solent.ac.uk)

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2017 Yes No