Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
National guidelines recommend measuring temperature whenever a child is ill using a digital thermometer in the armpit or an ear thermometer. However, armpit thermometers require healthcare professionals to undress the child and hold the thermometer under the arm for at least 30 seconds. Ear thermometers are easier to use, but may be inaccurate due to ear wax or insufficient straightening of the ear canal. A non-contact thermometer is a no touch thermometer, designed to allow to take children’s temperature on the forehead without touching the child and potentially causes less distress to children. This thermometer works by measuring infrared emissions from the body, which only takes a few seconds. The aim of the study is to assess the agreement between two NCIT versus ear and armpit thermometers in children aged 5 years or under.
Who can participate?
Unwell children aged 0-5 years (maximum illness 14 days) presenting to GP practice or out-of-hours service.
What does the study involve?
Participating children have their background details (age, gender, etc) recorded. They then have their body temperature measured using an armpit thermometer, an ear thermometer and twice with two different non-contact infrared thermometers. Parents/guardians and children are asked to rate each thermometer by preference.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits with participating. There are no notable risks however it does take up a small amount of participant’s time and could be distressing to an unwell child.
Where is the study run from?
The study is run from the University of Oxford and takes place in GP practices and out-of-hours service in Oxfordshire (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2016 to May 2018
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)
Who is the main contact?
1. Gail Hayward
2. George Edwards
Ms Gail Hayward
Radcliffe Primary Care
Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
+44 (0)1865 289357
Mr George Edwards
Radcliffe Primary Care
Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
+44 (0)1865 289300
MEasuring TemperatuRe In Children: Non-contact infrared thermometers for measuring body temperature in acutely ill children: a method comparison study
The aim of the study is to assess the agreement between two Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers (Thermofocus and Firhealth) versus electronic axillary and infrared tympanic thermometers in children who present with an acute illness in primary care.
South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee, 17/03/2017, 17/SC/0068
Non-randomised; Observational; Design type: Cross-sectional
Primary study design
Secondary study design
Cross sectional study
Patient information sheet
Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Specialty: Primary Care, Primary sub-specialty: Children; UKCRC code/ Disease: Other/ General symptoms and signs
Parents/guardians of children aged five years or under are approached by the research assistant while they are in the GP waiting area for possible recruitment. The research assistant records demographic information (including household composition, parental age and ethnicity) and baseline information (including prior fever medication use, parental impression of fever, fever duration) for each eligible child (after verbal consent from parents/guardians). Subsequently, the research assistant measures body temperature with four different thermometers, in a random order predetermined by the use of a random number generator. Children under four weeks of age do not have the tympanic thermometer measurement. Temperature measurements are performed consecutively in the shortest time frame possible, and no medication or drinks are administered between measurements. Once the four primary measurements are complete, a second measurement is taken with each Non-Contact Infrared Thermometer (NCIT) to evaluate reproducibility. Failures to perform measurements due to lack of cooperation of the child after three attempts, mechanical issues (operational or technological failure) and clinically implausible readings (based on clinician’s assessment) are recorded.
Parents are asked to score the acceptability of each thermometer on a visual analogue scale and rank the thermometers by preference. Children`s reaction to the different measurements are recorded by the Patient Discomfort Scale. Children aged four to five years are asked to score each thermometer using the Wong-Baker Face pain rating scale. Parents and children are blinded to the temperature measurements until they have rated their acceptability to avoid bias.
Verbal consent is sought for further contact regarding a qualitative telephone interview study to explore parent’s views and preferences regarding the different thermometers used. A subset of parents who consent to further contact are approached for an interview based on a purposive sampling procedure.
Verbal informed consent is also obtained from parents to keep their contact email or telephone number securely. This would be in order that future contact could be made to obtain written informed consent to access details of their child’s medical notes regarding re-attendance, secondary care referrals and admissions in the 30 days after the initial contact.
There is only one study visit, which is at the GP practice or out-of-hours service where the children are recruited and all interventions are performed.
Primary outcome measure
Agreement between the Thermofocus NCIT and electronic axillary thermometer is assessed using the limits of agreement at study visit
Secondary outcome measures
1. Agreement between the Thermofoucs NCIT and Infrared tympanic thermometer (and therefore between tympanic and axillary) is assessed using the limits of agreement at study visit
2. Agreement between the Thermofocus NCIT and Firhealth NCIT is assessed using the limits of agreement at study visit
3. The ability of NCITs to detect fever (≥38°C) is assessed using accuracy of diagnosing fever at study visit
4. The failure rates of all thermometers is assessed using proportion of failed measurements at study visit
5. The acceptability of the four thermometry methods is assessed using acceptability to parents and children if applicable at study visit
6. The reproducibility of measurements made with the two NCITs is assessed using intra-observer variability at study visit
Association between temperature readings and medication use at the index consultation with incidence of repeat consultations in in-hours and out-of-hours general practice, secondary referrals and hospital admission in the 30 days following initial recruitment is assessed by reviewing children’s medical notes.
Overall trial start date
Overall trial end date
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Participant inclusion criteria
1. Parent or guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
2. Male or Female, aged 0 to 5 years
3. Presenting to a GP practice or out-of-hours service with an acute illness of a maximum of 14
Inclusion criteria for qualitative interviews:
1. Recruited to main study
2. Able to conduct a telephone interview in English
Target number of participants
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Acute trauma
2. Clinically unstable warranting immediate care
3. Prior inclusion in the study
4. Unable to understand trial material in English
Recruitment start date
Recruitment end date
Countries of recruitment
Trial participating centre
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
University of Oxford Primary Care Health Sciences Radcliffe Primary Care Building Radcliffe Observatory Quarter Woodstock Road
National Institute for Health Research
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing statement:
Once all publications are complete the datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Gail Hayward (Gail.email@example.com) and George Edwards (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Intention to publish date
Participant level data
Available on request
Basic results (scientific)