A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of TURP, Laser and Watchful Waiting in the Treatment of Bladder Outflow Obstruction

ISRCTN ISRCTN16113281
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16113281
Secondary identifying numbers 941003 r245/02340
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
18/01/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof David Neal
Scientific

University of Newcastle
Department of Surgery
Framlington Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4HH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)191 222 7067

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymThe CLasP Study
Study objectivesTen to fifteen percent of men aged 40 undergo transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) in their lifetime.
About 20% do not achieve satisfactory symptomatic results, 5% to 10% suffer major morbidity and 0.2% to 1% die from the procedure. The annual cost of TURP in the USA is in excess of $3,000,000,000. New, less invasive treatments are now available including laser treatment which may be provided as a day-case procedure. It is unclear how laser treatment compares with TURP or indeed with conservative treatment (watchful waiting - reassurance and advice) in terms of cost, effectiveness, improvement in quality of life and urodynamic outcome. These deficiencies in knowledge are clearly very important to the NHS which cannot afford to take up high cost, high technology treatments unless they are shown to be of clear benefit. We propose carrying out a randomised controlled trial comparing TURP, laser treatment and watchful waiting in men who would normally undergo TURP.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedBladder outflow obstruction in men
Intervention1. Laser therapy with a noncontact, side firing neodymium:YAG probe
2. TURP (standard transurethral prostatic resection)
3. Watchful waiting (conservative management, including monitoring without active intervention)
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS)
2. Maximum urinary flow rate
3. A composite measure of success based on I-PSS and maximum urinary flow rate categories
4. I-PSS quality of life score
5. Post-void residual urine volume
Secondary outcome measures1. Treatment failure
2. Hospital stay
3. Major complications.
Overall study start date10/01/1994
Completion date30/09/1997

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexMale
Target number of participants106 (added 15/01/10; see publication [2])
Key inclusion criteriaMen with uncomplicated lower urinary tract symptom that is not acute or chronic urinary retention.
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not match inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment10/01/1994
Date of final enrolment30/09/1997

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

University of Newcastle
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4HH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive Northern and Yorkshire (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results for men with chronic urinary retention 01/07/2000 Yes No
Results article results for men with symptoms associated with benign prostatic enlargement 01/07/2000 Yes No
Results article results 01/07/2001 Yes No
Other publications economic evaluation 01/12/2002 Yes No
Results article results 01/10/2003 Yes No