Randomised controlled trial of total immunosuppression withdrawal in liver transplant recipients: role of ursodeoxycholic acid

ISRCTN ISRCTN16781831
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16781831
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
14/03/2007
Registration date
28/03/2007
Last edited
02/09/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Ghent Cam
Scientific

Section of hepatology
Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre
339 Windermere Road, London
Ontario
N6A 5A5
Canada

Email cam.ghent@lhsc.on.ca

Study information

Study designRandomised, placebo-controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Scientific title
Study objectivesIn this study we investigate whether oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid reduces the risk of rejection and recurrence of underlying disease in liver transplant recipients undergoing total immunosuppression withdrawal (TIW).
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada on 01/01/1995. Patients were informed about possible consequences of immunosuppression withdrawal (rejection, recurrence of disease, renal function).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLiver transplantation, rejection, withdrawal of immunosuppressions
Intervention26 liver recipients who had been free of rejection while on immunosuppressive agents for a minimum of two years will be randomised to receive either 15 mg/kg of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (N = 14) or identical placebo (N = 12) followed by sequential withdrawal of their immunosuppressive regimen over several months.

Prior to TIW a baseline liver biopsy was obtained and reviewed with a pathologist to exclude sub-clinical rejection and co-existent disease in the graft. Within one week of initiating TIW, patients underwent the following evaluations:
1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
2. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)
3. Alkaline phosphatase
4. Total bilirubin
5. Creatinine
6. Complete blood count (CBC)
7. Cyclosporin (CyA) levels by means of monoclonal antibody radioimmunoassay on whole blood (Cyclotrac, INCSTAR)

These same parameters were repeated every two weeks for the initial six months post-TIW and then monthly for a year thereafter. Liver biopsies were repeated in those who developed elevated liver enzymes (greater than 2 x normal) and in those who had completed six months of follow up with no immunosuppression other than the study medication. Secondary aims or endpoints such as development of renal failure, hypertension, extent of liver enzymes abnormalities as well as safety and compliance were assessed accordingly.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Biochemical and histological evidence of rejection
2. Graft dysfunction without rejection
3. Recurrence of pre-transplant disease
4. Six months without immunosuppression and no rejection or dysfunction on repeat liver biopsy
Secondary outcome measures1. Development of renal failure
2. Hypertension
3. Extent of liver enzymes abnormalities
4. Safety and compliance
Overall study start date01/01/1995
Completion date01/12/1996

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participants46
Key inclusion criteriaRecipients of liver transplantation at the University of Western Ontario, Canada who had stable graft function (no clinical or biochemical evidence of liver disease) for a minimum of two years were offered TIW if they met the following criteria:
1. No documented rejection episodes for at least 24 months prior to the study
2. A minimum post-transplant follow up period of at least 2 years
3. A history of compliance with medications, blood testing for laboratory analyses and in the case of patients transplanted for alcohol-induced liver disease, abstinence from all alcohol beverages during the study period
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients requiring triple anti-rejection therapy for frequent or severe episodes of rejection in the past
2. More than one liver transplant
3. Requiring anti rejection therapy for non-liver disorders (psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis [RA] etc)
Date of first enrolment01/01/1995
Date of final enrolment01/12/1996

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada

Study participating centre

Section of hepatology
Ontario
N6A 5A5
Canada

Sponsor information

University of Western Ontario (Canada)
University/education

c/o Dr Ghent Cam
Section of hepatology
Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre
339 Windermere Road, London
Ontario
N6A 5A5
Canada

Email cam.ghent@lhsc.on.ca
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02grkyz14

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of Western Ontario (Canada) - the Liver Unit

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan