ISRCTN ISRCTN17041826
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17041826
Secondary identifying numbers 20699
Submission date
07/07/2016
Registration date
11/07/2016
Last edited
10/10/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Premature babies are at high risk of developing breathing problems because their lungs are not fully matured when they are born. The use of mechanical ventilation (breathing machine) is life saving for these children, however it can also damage the lungs, leading to long-term breathing problems or dependence on receiving oxygen (bronchopulmonary dysplasia). New forms of breathing support for newborn babies have been developed with the aim of minimising lung damage. One of these new forms, called volume targeted ventilation (VTV), delivers the same size of inflation (mechanical breath) to the baby despite changes in their lung function. Previous studies in both prematurely and term-born infants that larger rather than smaller mechanical breaths appear to reduce the breathing effort required from the baby. However it is no known what size of inflation is best for the growing population of prematurely born infants with developing or established bronchopulmonary, who may remain on the breathing machine for many months. The aim of this study is to assess how hard premature babies on breathing support are working to breathe when receiving different breath volumes (sizes) via the ventilator (within the normal baby breathing range).

Who can participate?
Infants born at least eight weeks early who rely on breathing machines two weeks after birth.

What does the study involve?
Each baby has a small catheter (thin flexible tube) placed to measure how hard the baby is working to breathe. The babies then receive four different sizes of breath for 20 minutes in a random order, with 20 minutes in between (during which they receive their normal size breaths from the ventilator). The work or breathing is measured for the last 5 minutes of each period. The whole study takes around 3 hours, after which the catheter is removed. The best mechanical breath size is determined by the level at which the baby has the lowest work of breathing.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There are no direct benefits to participants taking part in this study. There is a small risk of slight discomfort for participants when the catheter is placed and removed.

Where is the study run from?
King's College Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2015 to February 2018

Who is funding the study?
1. Biomedical Research Council (UK)
2. Kings College London (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Professor Anne Greenough
anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk

Contact information

Prof Anne Greenough
Scientific

King's College London
Neonatal Unit
4th Floor
Golden Jubilee Wing
King's College Hospital
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-8672-5349
Phone +44 20 3299 9000 ext. 38492
Email anne.greenough@kcl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designSingle-centre randomised cross over trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised cross over trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleOptimisation of neonatal ventilation - determining the appropriate level of volume guarantee
Study objectivesThe aim of this study is to determine which level of volume targetting will best reduce the work of breathing in ventilated infants with evolving or established bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics Board - South East Coast - Surrey Research Ethics Committee, 28/10/2015, ref: 15/LO/1414
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSpecialty: Children, Primary sub-specialty: Neonatal
InterventionParticipants are ventilated infants who are randomised to receive targeted tidal volume of 4,5,6, and 7ml in a random order for 20 minutes, with a 20 minute 'washout period' of their baseline settings in between. A dual tipped pressure transducer catheter is inserted at the beginning of the study (similar to a feeding tube) and used to record the pressure-time product of the diaphragm for the last 5 minutes of each 20 minute period. The study lasts for around 3 hours in total.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureWork of breathing, measured as the pressure-time product of the diaphragm, during the last 5 minutes of each 20 minute period at different levels of volume targeting.
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/09/2015
Completion date28/02/2018

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 18; UK Sample Size: 18
Total final enrolment18
Key inclusion criteria2. Infants born less than 32 weeks completed gestation
2. Remain ventilator dependent two weeks after birth
Key exclusion criteria1. Infants born above 32 weeks of gestational age
2. Infants who have been successfully extubated by two weeks age
3. Complex congenital cardiac abnormalities
4. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Date of first enrolment04/05/2016
Date of final enrolment14/11/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

King's College Hospital
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9RS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

King's College London
University/education

Room 1.8 Hodgkin Building
Guy's Campus
London
SE1 1UL
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0220mzb33

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Biomedical Research Council

No information available

Kings College London
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
Alternative name(s)
King's College, King's College London UK, KCL, King's
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date14/11/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Basic results 08/02/2019 No No
Results article results 01/01/2019 08/05/2019 Yes No
Protocol file version 3.0 16/08/2016 10/10/2022 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN17041826_Basic results_08Feb19.pdf
32307 Protocol v3.0 16Aug2016.pdf

Editorial Notes

10/10/2022: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
08/05/2019: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. Publication reference added.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
14/02/2019: The following changes were made:
1. The inclusion criteria have been changed
2. The basic results of this trial have been uploaded as an additional file.