Treatment of pain following keyhole surgery in West Africa

ISRCTN ISRCTN17667918
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17667918
Submission date
27/06/2018
Registration date
03/07/2018
Last edited
09/08/2019
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Following keyhole surgery patients often experience significant pain and this can delay their return to their normal activities. Some surgeons inject local anaesthetic at the end of the operation into the parts of the abdomen where cuts were made, in order to reduce pain over the first few postoperative hours. However there is no good evidence to support this practice in Nigeria and a large trial is needed to test whether these local anaesthetic injections do reduce pain. The aim of this initial, small study is to find out whether it is possible to run a large-scale randomised study to address this research question in Nigeria.

Who can participate?
Adult patients (18 years or older) undergoing planned keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery for removal of the gallbladder.

What does the study involve?
All participants will receive an injection at the keyhole cut sites. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either one of two local anaesthetics in the injections, or sterile salt water (saline) only. At four points in the 24 hours following surgery, participants’ pain and nausea will be assessed by a doctor asking simple questions.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Patients who receive a local anaesthetic reaction may experience better pain control. There is a very low risk of an allergic reaction to the injections administered.

Where is the study being run?
Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2015 to June 2017

Who is the main contact?
Dr Adewale O. Adisa, wadisc@yahoo.com

Contact information

Dr Adewale Adisa
Public

Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University
Ile-Ife
220005
Nigeria

Study information

Study designFeasibility randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised parallel trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet ISRCTN17667918_PIS_03Jul2018.pdf
Scientific titleFeasibility study for a randomised controlled trial of bupivacaine, lignocaine with adrenaline, or placebo wound infiltration to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in West Africa
Study objectivesThis trial was designed to determine the benefits of local anaesthetic (bupivacaine or lignocaine with adrenaline) port site infiltration to reduce pain. We aimed to deliver this external feasibility study to determine whether a full phase randomised trial could be delivered.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics and Research Committee of the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, May 2015, IRB/IEC/0004553
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy
InterventionAt the end of the procedure, skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and parietal peritoneum will be infiltrated with one of the following solutions:
1. 3 ml of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline in each 10-mm port site and 2 ml in each 5-mm port site (total 200 mg of lignocaine with 1:1000 adrenaline)
2. 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride (Marcaine® 0.5%) in each 10-mm port sites and 2 ml in each 5-mm port site (total 50 mg of plain bupivacaine)
3. 3 ml of 0.9% saline in each 10-mm port site and 2 ml in each 5-mm port site.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase II
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Bupivacaine, lignocaine with adrenaline
Primary outcome measure1. Number of patients recruited over a 24 month period
2. Compliance with randomised treatment allocation assessed by the proportion of patients who receive their randomised treatment allocation
3. Outcome assessment completion assessed by the proportion of pain assessments (measured using both the numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively) and nausea assessments (measured using the numerical rating scale measured at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively) that are completed
Secondary outcome measuresCompletion of nausea assessment (numerical rating scale) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively,
Overall study start date15/10/2014
Completion date30/04/2018

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants69
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 years or older
2. Undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease
Key exclusion criteria1. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status class 3+
2. Pregnant women
3. Acute cholecystitis
4. History of allergy to bupivacaine, lignocaine or related local anaesthetic drugs
4. Known peptic ulcer disease
5. Known opiate addiction
6. Known contraindications to use of NSAIDs such as bronchial asthma
7. If an abdominal drain is inserted or the operation was converted to an open procedure, the patient will not receive the allocated intervention and pain scores will not be collected
Date of first enrolment01/07/2015
Date of final enrolment30/06/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Nigeria

Study participating centre

Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex
Ilesa Road
Ile-Ife
220005
Nigeria

Sponsor information

Obafemi Awolowo University
University/education

P.M.B. 13
Ile-Ife
220282
Nigeria

Website https://www.oauife.edu.ng
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04snhqa82

Funders

Funder type

Not defined

Investigator initiated and funded

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date01/09/2018
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
Publication and dissemination planPublication is anticipated in an international surgical journal.
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not expected to be made available as this is a feasibility study designed to inform future trial development, rather than to produce clinical data for the evaluation of specific interventions. However, should a legitimate need arise for the dataset, it will be available upon request.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet 03/07/2018 02/04/2019 No Yes
Results article results 26/03/2019 04/04/2019 Yes No

Additional files

ISRCTN17667918_PIS_03Jul2018.pdf
Uploaded 02/04/2019

Editorial Notes

09/08/2019: PubMed link added.
04/04/2019: Publication reference added.
02/04/2019: The participant information sheet has been uploaded.