Comparison of muscle sparing thoracotomy and posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer

ISRCTN ISRCTN17868937
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17868937
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
08/10/2009
Registration date
20/10/2009
Last edited
17/08/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Luigi Santambrogio
Scientific

Via Francesco Sforza, 35
Milan
20122
Italy

Phone +39 (0)25 503 5513
Email luigi.santambrogio@unimi.it

Study information

Study designSingle centre prospective randomised controlled double blind trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleMuscle sparing versus posterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer: a single centre randomised, double blind, controlled trial
Study acronymMST PLT
Study objectivesMuscle sparing thoracotomy should have more advantages in pain, muscle strength and pulmonary function than posterolateral thoracotomy.
Ethics approval(s)Local Ethics Committee (Comitato Etico Ospedale Maggiore di Milano I.R.C.C.S) approved on the 20th June 2003
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedLung cancer
InterventionPatients are randomly divided in two groups in respect to surgical access to the thorax:
Group A: Posterolateral thoracotomy
Group B: Muscle-sparing thoracotomy

The duration of treatment is from 2 to 3 hours; the total duration of follow-up for all treatments are 3 years.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Pain severity, assessed by patients 4 times a day in a relaxed position, and during coughing using a visual analogue pain scale (0 = no pain, 10 = most severe pain). The eight scores were then averaged to produce a daily composite score. Pain scores were measured pre-operatively and daily after surgery to post-operative day 7. After 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 3 years following the operation, patients were asked about the occurrence of symptoms of post-thoracotomy pain or post-thoracotomy syndrome.
2. Analgesic consumption for pain at the site of the thoracotomy was recorded. An aggregate analgesic score (AAS) was computed adding 1 point for each mg of intravenous morphine used, 5 points for every dose of intravenous ketorolac (30 mg) and 4 points for each oral dose of acetaminophen-codeine (500/30 mg) administered.
Secondary outcome measures1. Shoulder mobility and muscle strength was measured by a physiotherapist before surgery; the analyses were repeated at 1, 3 and 7 post-operative days and after 1 and 6 months by the same blinded observer. Muscle strength was recorded during adduction, abduction, flexion and extension on the operated side; the results were graded on a scale from 0 to 5 (5 = normal strength) according to the Daniels and Worthingham's muscle tests
2. Pulmonary function tests were obtained pre-operatively and daily after surgery to post-operative day 7. The spirometry was repeated at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and 3 years after the operation.
3. Major morbidity
Overall study start date01/07/2003
Completion date31/07/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants100
Key inclusion criteria1. Male and female
2. Aged greater than 18 and less than 80 years
3. Lung cancer (stage I and II)
4. Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Previous thoracic surgery
2. Psychiatric disease
3. Non-controlled diabetes
4. Thoracic wall resection
5. Epidural analgesia
6. Severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
7. Drug abuse
8. Chronic pain syndromes
Date of first enrolment01/07/2003
Date of final enrolment31/07/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Italy

Study participating centre

Via Francesco Sforza, 35
Milan
20122
Italy

Sponsor information

Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli Regina Elena (Italy)
Research organisation

University of Milan
Via Francesco Sforza, 35
Milan
20122
Italy

Phone +39 (0)25 503 5513
Email luigi.santambrogio@unimi.it
Website http://www.policlinico.mi.it
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/016zn0y21

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli Regina Elena (Italy)

No information available

University of Milan (Italy)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/10/2010 Yes No