Condition category
Date applied
Date assigned
Last edited
Prospectively registered
Overall trial status
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Publication status

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Most bowel cancers develop from adenomas, a type of small growth that grows on the bowel wall. Removing adenomas can help to prevent the development of cancer. The NHS now offers screening for bowel cancer to all men and women aged between 60 and 69 years and from 2010, the age range will be extended to 74 years. The screening test, called FOBT, looks for traces of blood in the stool. People who have a positive FOBT are offered colonoscopy, an examination in which an endoscope is used to examine the lining of the bowel for cancers and polyps. Those who have large or multiple adenomas found at colonoscopy are known to have an increased risk of developing more adenomas and possibly bowel cancer. Therefore they are currently offered surveillance colonoscopy at 3 year intervals. There are a number of problems with this approach. Colonoscopy is a costly procedure requiring a skilled doctor, and it carries a small risk of serious complications. It can miss lesions - indeed most advanced lesions (large adenomas or cancers) found at follow-up examinations were present but missed at the previous colonoscopy. Surveillance colonoscopy is also wasteful of resources because significant lesions are found in only about 3% of examinations, so 97% of surveillance colonoscopies will find either nothing or only small harmless adenomas. This is reassuring to the patient but offers no real benefit. Because more adenomas are now being found as a result of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP), the number of surveillance colonoscopies is increasing and threatens to overwhelm available resources. A more cost-effective way of protecting people with higher-risk adenomas is required. We propose that a new type of stool test (faecal immunological test, FIT) could offer effective protection for this higher-risk group at a fraction of the cost. Only patients who had a positive FIT result would need to be offered colonoscopy. This study is designed to estimate the benefit of this approach.

Who can participate?
People who have taken part in the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) and have been diagnosed with large or multiple adenomas

What does the study involve?
Participants are offered the FIT at 1, 2 and 3 years. The test is very simple, requiring participants to collect a tiny amount of stool on a probe and return to the laboratory (easier than the FOBT which requires 6 stool samples). Participants who have a positive FIT result are offered a colonoscopy immediately and their next colonoscopy will be three years later. Those who do not test positive to any of the three annual FITs have their colonoscopy at 3 years in the usual way. We compare the total number of bowel lesions found in people who test positive at the 1st, 2nd or 3rd FITs with the number of lesions found at 3-year colonoscopy in those who had a negative FIT result. If most important lesions are found in the group who have positive FIT results, this would suggests that this new approach could provide effective protection and ultimately mean that colonoscopy could be used only in cases with a positive FIT result.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants who have a positive FIT results at Years 1 or 2 will be offered a colonoscopy early and some of them will have no adenomas detected, so it will not benefit them, but some participants will have important lesions found that would otherwise not be detected until 3 years and therefore will derive benefit. The FIT test will be offered in addition to the 3-year colonoscopy which is the current procedure and we will not be replacing their colonoscopy, so the risk of missing lesions is not increased.

Where is the study run from?
Imperial College London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2011 to December 2015

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Current main contact as of 13/02/2019:
Dr Amanda Cross,
Previous main contact:
Prof Wendy S Atkin,

Trial website

Contact information



Primary contact

Dr Amanda Cross


Contact details

Imperial College London
St. Mary's Campus
Norfolk Place
W2 1PG
United Kingdom
+44 (0)20 7594 3401

Additional identifiers

EudraCT number number

Protocol/serial number

HTA 09/22/192

Study information

Scientific title

Faecal immunochemical testing for adenoma surveillance (FIT for Follow-up study)


FIT for Follow-Up

Study hypothesis

The overall objective is to test the hypothesis that annual immunochemical faecal occult blood testing (iFOBT or FIT) is a feasible, safe, acceptable and cost-saving alternative to colonoscopy surveillance for the diagnosis of advanced adenomas (AA) and early stage colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with intermediate risk colorectal adenomas.

More details can be found at:
Protocol can be found at:

Ethics approval

Plan to submit to the Central London REC 1

Study design

Pragmatic accuracy and efficiency study

Primary study design


Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Trial setting


Trial type


Patient information sheet

Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet


Bowel cancer


People who have taken part in the BCSP and been diagnosed with large or multiple adenomas will be offered the FIT annually at 1, 2 and 3 years. People participating in this study who have a positive FIT will be offered a colonoscopy immediately and their next colonoscopy will be three years later. Those who do not test positive to any of the three annual FITs will have their colonoscopy at 3 years in the usual way.

Patients will receive a Patient Acceptability and Mental Well Being Questionnaire in Years 1 and 2. In Year 3, remaining patients will receive an End of Study Questionnaire that will include an additional set of questions on preferences for annual FIT vs. 3-yearly colonoscopy.

Intervention type



Not Applicable

Drug names

Primary outcome measure

The cumulative yield of CRC/AA in those testing positive on any one of the 3 annual FITs, relative to the total CRC/AA (those testing positive on any of the FITs plus additional CRC/AA cases detected at the 3-year colonoscopy in those testing negative at all 3 FITs). From this we can calculate the proportion of cases which would go undetected if the FIT regimen was standard.

Secondary outcome measures

1. Completion and positivity rates for 1st, 2nd and 3rd annual FITs
2. Positive predictive values for detection of CRC/AA at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd FIT screenings in patients who undergo colonoscopic investigation
3. Detection rate of CRC/AA at the 3-year colonoscopy in patients who test negative at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd FIT screenings
4. Preference for annual FIT vs. 3-yearly colonoscopy for surveillance
5. Quality of life scores and subjective health status
6. Incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of the annual FIT vs. 3-yearly colonoscopy surveillance

Overall trial start date


Overall trial end date


Reason abandoned (if study stopped)


Participant inclusion criteria

1. Men and women aged 60-75 years
2. Tested positive in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP)
3. Had colonoscopy at which intermediate risk adenomas were removed during the past year
4. Were told they required a colonoscopy at 3 years
We will invite eligible participants from the entire BCSP however recruitment will be coordinated by one centre.

Participant type


Age group




Target number of participants


Participant exclusion criteria

Those who do not return a consent form

Recruitment start date


Recruitment end date



Countries of recruitment

United Kingdom

Trial participating centre

Imperial College London
W2 1PG
United Kingdom

Sponsor information


Imperial College London (UK)

Sponsor details

Clinical Research Governance Office
Sir Alexander Fleming Building
South Kensington campus
United Kingdom

Sponsor type




Funder type


Funder name

Health Technology Assessment Programme (ref: 09/22/192)

Alternative name(s)

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA

Funding Body Type

government organisation

Funding Body Subtype

National government


United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Participant level data

Not provided at time of registration

Basic results (scientific)

A total of 8009 individuals were invited to participate in the study. Of those invited, 5938 (74%) returned a signed consent form and completed a FIT at year one; these individuals were included in our study. Participation in the study was similar amongst men and women, and across age groups.
We found that FIT was well-accepted with 97% of participants returning a completed FIT at years 2 and 3. Over the three years of the study, 786 (13%) participants tested FIT positive, at which point they were offered colonoscopy.

Participants who did not test FIT positive were offered colonoscopy at 3 years. Of the total 5938 participants, 5225 (88%) had a colonoscopy at some time during the study. Bowel cancer was diagnosed in 29 (0.6%) participants and advanced adenomas were diagnosed in 446 (8.5%).
In total, 725 (12%) participants underwent colonoscopy as a result of a positive FIT result. Among these individuals, bowel cancer was found in 17 (2.3%) and advanced adenomas in 151 (21%). Annual FIT therefore identified 17 of 29 (59%) participants with bowel cancer and 151 of 446 (34%) participants with advanced adenomas over the three years of the study.

In summary, the study demonstrated that annual FIT could identify 59 of every 100 bowel cancers and 34 of every 100 individuals with advanced adenomas if repeated over three years.

Publication list

2015 interim results in conference proceedings:
2018 results in:
2018 results in:
2019 results in:
2019 results in:

Publication citations

Additional files

Editorial Notes

13/02/2019: The following changes were made: 1. The scientific contact was changed 2. The plain English summary was updated 3. The basic results (scientific) were added 4. Three publication references were added 09/01/2019: Publication reference added. 31/05/2018: Conference proceedings added. Trial website added. 13/04/2016: Plain English summary added.