Plain English Summary
Background and study aims:
Research suggests that many mental health professionals experience mental health problems themselves but that many are reluctant to talk about their experiences (‘disclose’). This is the case particularly in a work and professional context, due to fears about negative consequences and a perceived lack of appropriate support. This study tests the delivery and impact of a new self-help intervention (HOP-MHP, short for Honest, Open, Proud for Mental Health Professionals) that was designed to support mental health professionals in reaching decisions relating to the disclosure of mental health problems they may be experiencing or may have experienced in the past. Participants complete the HOP-MHP self-help guide to consider the potential benefits and costs of disclosure, and to help them decide whether, where and how they may want to disclose their experiences. They have weekly email contact with a researcher to keep them engaged with the study. Those in the intervention arm have the option of accessing a closed web-based peer forum where they can discuss their experiences and concerns generally and in relation to the HOP-MHP intervention with peers.
Who can participate?
The study is open to mental health professionals (including those in training) resident in the UK who have current or past personal experience of mental health problems, and who would like an opportunity to consider whether or not they would like to be (more) open about their experience in social and/or work settings.
What does the study involve?
Participants complete questionnaires about their current and past experience of mental health problems and their experiences of and attitudes to disclosure and help-seeking. Participants are then assigned at random to either the HOP-MHP arm or to the wait-list control arm. Those in the intervention arm are sent the HOP-MHP self-help guide, which consists of three sessions including exercises and tasks. Each session is expected to take approximately 1 to 1.5 hours to complete and participants are asked to complete sessions at a rate of approximately one session per week. Once they have completed the guide (approximately 3 - 6 weeks later), they complete the measures again (Time 1) and are a sent a follow-up (‘booster’) session 4 weeks later. After this, participants complete the measures a third time and are invited to take part in a 30-minute telephone interview about their experiences of the self-help guide and completion of the measures. Participants are also given access to a closed web based peer support forum at the same time as being sent the HOP-MHP guide.
Participants allocated to the wait-list control arm are asked to complete the Time 1 measures 4 weeks from baseline, and again after a further four weeks, matching the time points in the intervention arm. Once they have completed the measures at all three time points they are sent the HOP-MHP self-help guide and are also given access to the HOP-MHP peer forum.
Participants in both study arms receive weekly emails from a member of the research team who guides them through the study. Participants in both arms also have access to relevant information via the project website, including information about resources providing support and advice, and their legal rights.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The intervention will not place any pressure on participants to disclose and will guide them in carefully weighing the potential benefits and risks of disclosure in different settings. It is hoped that completion of the HOP-MHP self-help guide will allow participants to feel less worried or stressed about disclosure and a perceived need to keep their personal experiences of mental health problems secret.
There is a possibility that participants will experience distress when reflecting on their experiences, beliefs they hold about mental health problems, and stress related to disclosure and perceived need for secrecy. We feel that this risk is counterbalanced by the potential benefits of supported disclosure and a greater openness about personal experiences of mental health problems.
Where is the study run from?
University College London (UK)
Who is funding the study?
1.University College London (UK)
2.British Psychological Society (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2016 to October 2019
Main contact:
Dr Katrina Scior (Principal Investigator)
k.scior@ucl.ac.uk
Trial website
Contact information
Type
Public
Primary contact
Dr Katrina Scior
ORCID ID
Contact details
Research Department of Clinical
Educational and Health Psychology
UCL
1-19 Torrington Place
London
WC1E 7HB
United Kingdom
0207 6791605
k.scior@ucl.ac.uk
Additional identifiers
EudraCT number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
HOP-MHP Trial
Study information
Scientific title
Pilot RCT to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the HOP-MHP guided self-help intervention
compared to a wait-list control in reducing stigma stress and disclosure distress among mental health professionals with personal experiences of mental health challenges
Acronym
HOP-MHP
Study hypothesis
1. Participants completing the HOP-MHP self-help guide will report decreased stigma stress, disclosure related distress, depression, anxiety, self-stigma, and secrecy compared to the control group after 4 to 6 weeks, and these effects will be maintained at 2 to 3 months.
2. Participants completing the HOP-MHP self-help guide will show an increased likelihood to disclose their current or past mental health challenges to others in their social or work circles compared to the control group after 4 to 6weeks, and these effects will be maintained at 8 to 10 weeks.
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee, 28/10/2017, ref:Project ID No: 9297/002.
Study design
This is a single-centre single blind 2 arm RCT comparing the combined HOP-MHP guided self-help intervention and access to an anonymous, closed web based peer-forum with a waiting-list control condition. Variable block randomisation will be used to allocate eligible participants who have provided written consent and completed the baseline measures to either the intervention or control group. Participants allocated to the intervention arm will be sent a digital copy of the HOP-MHP guide, and provided with details regarding how to access the HOP-MHP peer forum. Participants allocated to the control arm will be a wait-list control. They will not receive any intervention until they have completed the measures at the 3-months follow-up point, at which time they will be given access to the HOP-MHP guide and HOP-MHP peer forum. Participants in both arms will be sent weekly engagement emails.
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Trial setting
Community
Trial type
Treatment
Patient information sheet
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research-stigma-and-disclosure
Condition
Mental health
Intervention
HOP-MHP is an adaptation of the original Honest Open Proud (HOP) programme (http://
www.honestopenproud.org) manualised group intervention, developed by Corrigan et al. (2012), which comprises of three sessions and a booster session. The aim of HOP is to guide and support people in making decisions in different contexts about potential disclosure of mental health problems they are experiencing or have experienced in the past.
Given that many mental health professionals may be concerned about the potential negative effects of disclosure inherent in joining a group intervention, HOP-MHP takes the form of a guided self-help intervention, covers the same topics as HOP, and also uses a 3 sessions plus booster structure. The language, case stories, tables and work sheets contained within the original HOP manual and workbook were substantially modified with input from mental health professionals. Completion of the HOP-MHP self-help guide is supported through weekly emails sent by a named researcher who accompanies the participant from allocation through to follow-up. In addition, upon allocation to the intervention arm, participants are given access to a closed web based peer forum where they can discuss their general concerns and experiences in completing the HOP-MHP interventions with peers.
HOP-MHP is compared to a wait-list control. Those in the control arm are provided with the self-help guide and access to the peer forum upon completion of all follow-up measures.
Participants in the intervention arm receive the HOP-MHP intervention which consists of completion of the 3-session plus booster HOP-MHP self-help guide. The usual expectation is that participants will complete the 3 core sessions over 3 to 4 weeks, and the booster session about a month after the 3rd session. Participants receive weekly reminders by email to keep them engaged with the guide. As they move at their own pace though participants can take 3 to 4 months instead of the usual 2 months to complete the intervention.
Participants are allocated to either the intervention or control group on a 1:1 ration using block randomisation. Using Excel, a randomisation file with three separate sheets is set up. Participants who meet all inclusion criteria, provide written consent, and complete the baseline measures are allocated a study UI in sequential order of completing the baseline survey. The UIs are assigned a random number between 0 and 1 using the ‘Random’ function in Excel. Using the ‘Sort’ function, the random numbers (with associated UIs locked) are randomly sorted. In the third step, the randomly ordered UIs are allocated to the Intervention or Control arm on a 1:1 ration in blocks of 5, to ensure that the researchers are in ignorance of the next assignment in the sequence (Egan et al.2014).
Intervention type
Other
Phase
Drug names
Primary outcome measure
1.Stigma stress is measured using the Stigma Stress Scale (Rüsch et al, 2009), which measures the primary appraisal of stigma as harmful and the secondary appraisal of personal resources to cope with stigma.
Outcomes will be measured at 3 time points in both the intervention and control group: baseline (T0), 4 to 6 weeks from baseline (T1), and 10 to 12 weeks from baseline (T2). Participants in the intervention arm complete the T1 measure after they have completed the 3 core HOP-MHP sessions, and the T2 measures after they have completed the booster session. Those who complete the core and booster sessions at a slower pace than intended will complete the outcome measures over a somewhat longer timeframe, of T1 up to 8 weeks from baseline and T2 up to 16 weeks from baseline.
Secondary outcome measures
1. Disclosure related distress is measured using a 16 item scale that assesses distress about keeping mental health problems secret and fear of others finding out, in relation to eight different types of relationships: friend, family member, member of course staff (if still in training), clinical supervisor or manager, a colleague, health professional (for example during a routine medical appointment), client they are seeing, service user groups, derived from Rüsch et al.’s (2014) one item assessing disclosure related distress.
2. Depression is measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)
3. Anxiety is measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire
4. Self-Stigma is measured using the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale – Short Form (SSMIS-SF, Corrigan et al., 2011), adapted version with 15 items.
5. Secrecy is measured with the Secrecy Scale (Link et al., 1989), 9 items assessing an individual’s tendency to keep their own mental health difficulties a secret
6. Likelihood of future disclosure is assessed using a substantially adapted 16 item version of the 6-item Disclosure of Lived Experience scale (Rüsch et al., 2014)
Outcomes will be measured at 3 time points in both the intervention and control group: baseline (T0), 4 to 6 weeks from baseline (T1), and 10 to 12 weeks from baseline (T2). Participants in the intervention arm complete the T1 measure after they have completed the 3 core HOP-MHP sessions, and the T2 measures after they have completed the booster session. Those who complete the core and booster sessions at a slower pace than intended will complete the outcome measures over a somewhat longer timeframe, of T1 up to 8 weeks from baseline and T2 up to 16 weeks from baseline.
Overall trial start date
01/11/2016
Overall trial end date
30/06/2019
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
1. UK based mental health professional, whether qualified or currently in training, and not yet fully retired.
2. Participants must self-define as currently experiencing psychological, emotional and/or behavioural difficulties that have diminished their capacity for coping with the ordinary demands of life, or as having experienced such difficulties in the past.
3. They must have either not disclosed their experiences of mental health problems, or only in some settings.
4. Not at acute risk, defined as not having experienced thoughts that they would be better off dead or of hurting self in some way nearly every day.
Participant type
Health professional
Age group
Adult
Gender
Not Specified
Target number of participants
Total target number: 73
Participant exclusion criteria
1. Potential participants who are publicly ‘out’ about their current or past difficulties will not be eligible for the study.
2. Participants must be willing to complete the battery of standardised measures in order to take part in the research study, although they may leave individual items unanswered.
3.No personal experience of mental health problems
4. Fully retired from their post as a mental health service provider
Recruitment start date
20/09/2017
Recruitment end date
31/03/2019
Locations
Countries of recruitment
United Kingdom
Trial participating centre
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology
University College London
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
University College London
Sponsor details
Gower Street
London
WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom
02076791897
k.scior@ucl.ac.uk
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
Funders
Funder type
Not defined
Funder name
British Psychological Society
Alternative name(s)
BPS
Funding Body Type
private sector organisation
Funding Body Subtype
professional associations and societies
Location
United Kingdom
Funder name
University College London
Alternative name(s)
UCL
Funding Body Type
private sector organisation
Funding Body Subtype
academic
Location
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Planned publication in a peer reviewed journal
IPD sharing statement:
The datasets analysed during the current study will be available, after deidentification of individual participant data, upon request from the study lead (Dr Katrina Scior, k.scior@ucl.ac.uk). To gain access, data requestors will need to provide a methodologically sound proposal, and if approved, sign a data access agreement. Data will be made available from between 3 months to 5 years following publication of the findings.
Intention to publish date
30/09/2019
Participant level data
Available on request
Basic results (scientific)
Publication list