Effects of off pump versus on pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomised trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers

ISRCTN ISRCTN20472718
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN20472718
Secondary identifying numbers 066216
Submission date
22/07/2005
Registration date
22/07/2005
Last edited
12/06/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Joseph Brindaban Selvanayagam
Scientific

John Radcliffe Hospital
MRS Building
University of Oxford Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research Centre
Headley Way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 221867
Email joseph.selvanayagam@cardiov.ox.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleEffects of off pump versus on pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomised trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers
Study objectivesUsing Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance imaging (CMR), we compared the extent of peri-operative myocardial reversible injury (myocardial stunning) and irreversible injury (myocardial necrosis) in patients undergoing multi-vessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft surgery (CABG) with and without cardiopulmonary bypass, in a single center randomised trial.

To our knowledge, this is the first such study using cine and contrast-enhanced CMR. Furthermore, we correlated these CMR findings with the changes in post operative cardiac Troponin I. Our primary hypothesis was that off pump surgery results in reduced myocardial stunning (as measured by cine MRI) in the early post-operative period when compared to ON-pump CABG (ONCABG) surgery. We further hypothesised that off pump surgery is superior to ONCABG with regards to the extent of permanent myocardial damage and that post-operative myocardial enzyme release reflects myonecrosis.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedCABG surgery
InterventionSingle centre randomised trial comparing off pump (beating heart) versus conventional bypass coronary artery surgery.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure1. Left ventricular function at one week post-op
2. LV function at six months post-op
3. Myocardial necrosis post-op
Secondary outcome measuresNo secondary outcome measures
Overall study start date01/05/2002
Completion date01/10/2003

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants50
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged less than 75 years
2. Isolated coronary grafting
Key exclusion criteria1. Age greater than 75 years (ten patients)
2. Ppre-existing Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction less than 20% by echocardiogram; four patients)
3. Involvement in other clinical trials (ten patients)
4. Typical MRI contraindications (e.g. pacemaker, severe claustrophobia etc.; total of nine patients)
5. Baseline creatinine more than 200 µmol/L (two patients)
Date of first enrolment01/05/2002
Date of final enrolment01/04/2003

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Oxford (UK)
University/education

University Offices
Wellington Square
Oxford
OX1 2JD
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 270143
Email research.services@admin.ox.ac.uk
Website http://www.ox.ac.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/052gg0110

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Wellcome Trust (UK) (grant ref: 066216)
Private sector organisation / International organizations
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 27/01/2004 Yes No