A pilot patient preference randomised controlled trial of admission to a women's crisis house compared with psychiatric hospital admission
ISRCTN | ISRCTN20804014 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN20804014 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 29/11/2006
- Registration date
- 26/01/2007
- Last edited
- 04/08/2010
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Louise Howard
Scientific
Scientific
PO29 Section of Community Mental Health
Health Services Research Department
Institute of Psychiatry
De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
l.howard@iop.kcl.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Patient preference randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Quality of life |
Scientific title | |
Study acronym | CHOICES |
Study objectives | Primary hypothesis: Women admitted to women's crisis houses have higher levels of satisfaction with services compared with women admitted to traditional psychiatric wards. Secondary hypotheses: Women admitted to women's crisis houses compared with women admitted to traditional psychiatric wards: 1. Perceive themselves to be less stigmatised on follow-up 2. Have fewer service contacts and lower costs of care 3. Have a higher quality of life 4. Have fewer unmet needs 5. Feel they are less coerced 6. Have a greater improvement in symptomatology |
Ethics approval(s) | National Hospital for Neurology REC gave provisional ethical approval on the 30th of November 2006 (reference number is 06/Q0512/104). |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Any psychiatric disorder requiring admission to hospital or women's crisis house. |
Intervention | Admission to women's crisis house compared with admission to traditional psychiatric wards. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Satisfaction with services. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Stigma 2. Coercion 3. Contact with services and costs 4. Quality of life 5. Unmet needs 6. Symptoms |
Overall study start date | 01/02/2007 |
Completion date | 31/12/2007 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | 75 |
Key inclusion criteria | All consenting women requiring admission as a psychiatric inpatient or women's crisis house resident. |
Key exclusion criteria | Women who do not consent to take part in the study. |
Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2007 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2007 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
PO29 Section of Community Mental Health
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Institute of Psychiatry (UK)
Research organisation
Research organisation
King's College London
De Crespigny Park
London
SE5 8AF
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)20 7848 0121 |
---|---|
l.davison@iop.kcl.ac.uk | |
Website | http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk |
https://ror.org/0220mzb33 |
Funders
Funder type
Research council
Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) (Ref: G0401241; grant ID: 71994)
Government organisation / National government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), UK Medical Research Council, MRC
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/08/2010 | Yes | No |