A randomised trial of group-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy versus standard pain clinic treatment for chronic pelvic pain
ISRCTN | ISRCTN21012555 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21012555 |
Secondary identifying numbers | 2010UROL02 |
- Submission date
- 24/02/2011
- Registration date
- 31/03/2011
- Last edited
- 06/11/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mr Mark Rochester
Scientific
Scientific
Department of Urology
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Colney Lane
Norwich
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)16 0328 6286 |
---|---|
mark.rochester@nnuh.nhs.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Self Management Activation Randomised Trial for Prostatitis (SMART-P) |
Study acronym | SMART-P |
Study objectives | The main objective of the study is to show that a programme of group-directed cognitive behavioural therapy for men with chronic pelvic pain is more effective than standard therapy (pain relief and coping mechanisms delivered by the pain clinic). This will be evaluated by changes in the National Institute of Health Chronic Pelvic Pain Score (NIH-CPPS), a validated scoring system for assessing the severity of the condition which will be measured before and after the intervention. Chronic prostatitis is a severe, debilitating chronic illness suffered by a considerable number of men. A universally effective treatment is lacking which can be frustrating for clinicians and distressing for patients. We aim to improve the treatment of these patients by combining cognitive behavioural therapy, which has been shown to be effective for chronic pain conditions including chronic prostatitis, with group-directed self management which has been shown to be effective for a number of other chronic diseases. We propose to randomise patients to either a self management health and care education programme or to pain clinic referral alone (standard care). We believe that a randomised controlled trial is the most robust method of evaluation of our approach, and will allow us to compare to current available treatment in a scientific manner. |
Ethics approval(s) | Norfolk Research Ethics Committee approved on 19th January 2011, ref: 11/H0310/6 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Chronic prostatitis/Chronic pelvic pain syndrome |
Intervention | Men will be randomised to attend either a self management health and care education programme or to pain clinic referral alone. Standard care After exclusion of a treatable bacterial cause for CP/CPPS, referral to pain clinic will be as a result of agreement between clinician and patient. Pharmacological agents such as gabapentin, pregabalin and antidepressants are the mainstay of standard care at present. Intervention This group will take part in a course of six weekly small group sessions (five to eight men) developed in conjunction with experts in psychology, pain management and urology, each lasting one hour with a focus on: 1. Understanding physiology of pain 2. Psychological contributors 3. Pain-coping mechanisms 4. Behavioural responses 5. Prevention, rehabilitation and re-enablement 6. Relationships between symptom distress, emotion and pain We will design the sessions to enable the participants to learn techniques of problem solving and goal setting. Supported self care and co-production will be the underlying principles of this programme. The initial session is an introduction to the programme requirements, the rationale and the value of the approach. In early sessions , patients are instructed in the use of the Reaction Record for self-identifying and modifying catastrophic cognition and in understanding how such thinking is associated with greater negative affect, how there is little supportive evidence for such thinking, and how it can lead to poor choices in behavioural coping. During following sessions, patients identify and modify deficits in social support by practicing self-assertion communication exercises with their instructor and then later with significant others in their lives while using the Reaction Record to examine how to better negotiate distressing episodes. Further sessions use the Reaction Record tool to identify and modify illness-focused behavioural coping strategies and also to help re-engage the patient in physical and social activities that they may have abandoned. In the final session, patients are provided with a detailed review of their acquired behavioural modifications. Following this discussion, patients are instructed on continued problem-solving skills and future self-management challenges are discussed. At 2, 6, and 12 months, clinicians not involved in the conduct of the trial will review participants in the urology outpatient departments and perform NIH-CPPS assessment (a validated pain-score for chronic pelvic pain). |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Changes in the National Institute of Health Chronic Pelvic Pain Score (NIH-CPPS), a validated scoring system for assessing the severity of the condition which will be measured before and after the intervention. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Assess functional status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) and SF-36 score) 2. Changes in requirements for pain-relief medication will also be used as a measure of effectiveness 3. Patients degree of self-management/activation will be assessed by the PAM questionnaire The outcomes will be measured before and after the intervention. |
Overall study start date | 25/03/2011 |
Completion date | 24/03/2012 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Male |
Target number of participants | 120 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Men with chronic prostatitis (CP)/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) refractory to simple pharmacological manipulation from general urology clinics at Norfolk and Norwich University hospitals (NNUH) 2. All patients aged over 18 with a diagnosis of CP/CPPS made by a urologist referred for the first time by their GP 3. Patients must be refractory to antibiotic treatment |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Abnormal serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level 2. Suspected prostate cancer on digital rectal examination 3. Active urinary tract infection 4. Alternative cause for pain found by urologist (e.g. ureteric calculus) |
Date of first enrolment | 25/03/2011 |
Date of final enrolment | 24/03/2012 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Department of Urology
Norwich
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
NR4 7UY
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre
Hospital/treatment centre
Research and Development
c/o Kathryn Andrews
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Colney Lane
Norwich
NR4 7UY
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)16 0328 6611 |
---|---|
kathryn.andrews@nnuh.nhs.uk | |
https://ror.org/01wspv808 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Health Enterprise East Ltd (UK)-Regional Innovation Fund
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol article | study protocol | 26/09/2011 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
06/11/2019: Internal review.
08/10/2018: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.