Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of educational prompts in improving diabetes care
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN21863140 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN21863140 |
| Protocol serial number | 2005DIAB002 |
| Sponsor | Newcastle Primary Care NHS Trust (UK) |
| Funder | Newcastle Primary Care NHS Trust (UK) (ref: 2005DIAB002) - The funding comes from service development rather than NHS R&D monies. |
- Submission date
- 05/07/2005
- Registration date
- 25/07/2005
- Last edited
- 17/08/2018
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Robbie Foy
Scientific
Scientific
Centre for Health Services Research
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
21 Claremont Place
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4AA
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)191 222 7214 |
|---|---|
| R.C.Foy@ncl.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of educational prompts in improving diabetes care |
| Study objectives | In general practices receiving glycaemic educational messages attached to laboratory test reports, compared to those practices not, the number of HbA1c test requests will be higher and the mean HbA1c value will be lower. Similarly for cholesterol messages the number of cholesterol tests will be higher and the mean cholesterol value will be lower. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Diabetes mellitus |
| Intervention | Short educational messages added to paper and electronic general practice laboratory test reports of Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Practices, stratified by list size, will be randomly allocated to each intervention (glycaemic control educational messages and cholesterol control educational messages) independently. In the first randomisation, practices will be allocated to receive the glycaemic educational messages or control (no glycaemic educational messages). In the second randomisation, practices will be allocated to receive the cholesterol educational messages or control (no cholesterol educational messages). This will result in four groups: 1. Practices receiving glycaemic and cholesterol educational messages 2. Practices receiving only glycaemic educational messages 3. Practices receiving only cholesterol educational messages 4. Practices receiving no educational messages This will allow comparisons of the separate and combined effects of the two educational message interventions. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Number of HbA1c and cholesterol tests requested (standardised for practice size) and the general practice mean levels of HbA1c and cholesterol. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
No secondary outcome measures |
| Completion date | 31/07/2006 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Other |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 39 |
| Key inclusion criteria | General practices in Newcastle upon Tyne |
| Key exclusion criteria | Does not meet inclusion criteria |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/07/2005 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/07/2006 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Centre for Health Services Research
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE2 4AA
United Kingdom
NE2 4AA
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 16/12/2011 | Yes | No | |
| Protocol article | protocol | 24/07/2007 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
17/08/2018: Publication reference added.