Evaluation of effect of sedation on diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks

ISRCTN ISRCTN23482653
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN23482653
Secondary identifying numbers Protocol #6
Submission date
27/09/2005
Registration date
17/11/2005
Last edited
13/10/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Laxmaiah Manchikanti
Scientific

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Phone +1 270 554 8373
Email drm@asipp.org

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo demonstrate that sedation has no effect on the validity of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChronic low back pain
InterventionIntravenous injection of sodium chloride solution, midazolam, or fentanyl prior to lumbar facet joint nerve blocks under fluoroscopy.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Sodium chloride solution, midazolam, or fentanyl
Primary outcome measureFor a small proportion of patients with chronic low back pain, the administration of sedation with midazolam or fentanyl can be a confounding factor in the diagnosis of lumbar facet joint pain. The study shows that an intravenous preoperative sedative dose of a narcotic such as fentanyl or an anxiolytic such as midazolam is no more likely to cause a small proportion of patients to report false positive pain relief with active motion testing than sodium chloride placebo.
Secondary outcome measuresThe study suggests that prudent administration of midazolam or fentanyl to patients who are not relaxed may not have any significant adverse effect on the diagnostic validity of controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks.
Overall study start date02/02/2004
Completion date30/06/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants180 subjects, randomized into 3 groups with equal distribution
Key inclusion criteria1. Subjects were between 18 and 90 years of age
2. Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting, low back pain of at least 6 months duration
3. Subjects able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in the investigation
4. Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are able to understand the investigation and/or cooperate with the investigational procedures
5. Patients who have undergone diagnostic facet joint blocks and the diagnosis of lumbar facet joint pain has been previously confirmed
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients without lumbar facet joint pain
2. Patients with uncontrolled major depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
3. Pregnant or lactating women
4. Patients with multiple complaints involving multiple other problems which have overlapping pain complaints
5. Patients unable to achieve proper positioning or unable to understand informed consent and protocol
6. Patients with a history of adverse reaction to either midazolam or fentanyl
Date of first enrolment02/02/2004
Date of final enrolment30/06/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United States of America

Study participating centre

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Sponsor information

Ambulatory Surgery Center and Pain Management Center of Paducah (USA)
Hospital/treatment centre

2831 Lone Oak Road
Paducah, KY
42003
United States of America

Phone +1 270 554 8373
Email drm@asipp.org
Website http://www.thepainmd.com

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Ambulatory Surgery Center and Pain Management Center of Paducah (USA)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2004 Yes No