Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable Sutures - Evaluation of abdominal Closure Techniques

ISRCTN ISRCTN24023541
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN24023541
Secondary identifying numbers KSC 04/2003
Submission date
03/02/2004
Registration date
08/03/2004
Last edited
14/02/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Markus W Büchler
Scientific

Im Neuenheimer Feld 110
Heidelberg
69120
Germany

Phone +49 (0)622 156 6200
Email markus.buechler@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study acronymINSECT-Trial
Study objectivesPatients undergoing primary median laparotomy for an elective surgical intervention.
Ethics approval(s)The final protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg, Medical School.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAbdominal surgery
InterventionA standardised surgical approach for opening of the abdomen is performed in all patients with a midline incision of at least 15 cm length.

The randomisation will proceed when the operation has been finished and the abdominal wall cavity should be closed. The treatment groups are:
1. Two continuous groups use the same technique with a 4 to 1 ratio (suture to incision length)
2. Two loops will be used in each patient and tied together in the middle of the incision
3. One interrupted suture group: vicryl sutures are used with standard pointed needles

The stitches are performed from the cranial end to the middle of the incision and then from the caudal end also to the middle of the incision. Once all the stitches are made, each suture is tied with at least four knots. The subcutaneous tissue is not sutured and no subcutaneous drainage is used in all patients. The skin is closed with clips or single stitches of a non-absorbable monofilament suture material. The postoperative treatment is standardised.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureThe frequency of incisional hernias between three different abdominal fascia closure methods after one year postoperatively.
Secondary outcome measuresFrequencies of early and late onset complications such as burst abdomen, postoperative pulmonary complications, wound infections and incisional hernias after three years postoperatively.
Overall study start date01/07/2004
Completion date31/08/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants600
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged equal or greater than 18 years
2. Expected survival time more than 12 months
3. Patients undergoing primary and elective median laparotomy (patients with prior laparoscopy or abdominal operation via paramedian incision (e.g. appendectomy) may be included in the trial)
4. Body mass index (BMI) less than 35
5. Expected length of incision greater than 15 cm
6. Patient must be able to give informed consent
7. Patient has given informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Peritonitis
2. Emergency surgery
3. Participation in another intervention-trial with interference of intervention and outcome of this study
4. Coagulopathy: a group of disorders of the blood clotting (coagulation) system in which bleeding is prolonged and excessive with abnormal values in the blood laboratory
5. Severe psychiatric or neurologic diseases
6. Lack of compliance
7. Drug- and/or alcohol-abuse according to local standards
8. Current immunosuppressive therapy (more than 40 mg of a corticoid per day or azathioprin)
9. Chemotherapy within 2 weeks before operation
10. Radiotherapy of the abdomen completed longer than 8 weeks before operation
11. Inability to follow the instructions given by the investigator or the telephone interviewer (insufficient command of language, dementia, lack of time)
12. Lack of informed consent
Date of first enrolment01/07/2004
Date of final enrolment31/08/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Im Neuenheimer Feld 110
Heidelberg
69120
Germany

Sponsor information

BBD Aesculap GmbH (Germany)
Industry

Am Aesculap Platz
Tuttlingen
78532
Germany

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04nxj7050

Funders

Funder type

Industry

BBD Aesculap GmbH (Germany)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article Protocol 08/03/2005 Yes No
Other publications Sub-study on the ethical review process 01/02/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/04/2009 Yes No
Results article results 08/02/2012 Yes No