Leucopatch in the management of hard to heal diabetic foot ulcers

ISRCTN ISRCTN27665670
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN27665670
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02224742
Secondary identifying numbers 14626
Submission date
05/07/2013
Registration date
05/07/2013
Last edited
27/09/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Mrs Eleanor Harrison
Scientific

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit
University of Nottingham
Queens Medical Centre
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom

Email leucopatch@nottingham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleLeucopatch in the management of hard to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymDRN 819 Leucopatch II
Study hypothesisDiabetic foot ulcers are the source of considerable suffering and cost and there are currently no wound care products available that have been demonstrated to improve healing, or that are cost effective. There have however been a small number of studies which have examined the use of platelets or fluid derived from platelets, either from the patients own blood or from blood bank products. These have suggested some promise, but have suffered from technical difficulties in making a suitable wound care product or the volume of blood required to derive the product. It is thought that the reason why they may work is that growth factors released by the platelets may stimulate the wound to heal.

This study will be a formal, randomised controlled trial to assess a new device for creating a wound care product which is a plug or patch comprising fibrin, white cells and platelets derived from 18 mls of the patients own blood. The application of this fibrin/white cell/platelet patch to the patients wound on a weekly basis will be compared with usual best care in patients with hard to heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers in a secondary care setting in 25 centres in the UK, Denmark and Sweden.
Ethics approval(s)13/WM/0202; First MREC approval date 24/05/2013
ConditionTopic: Diabetes Research Network; Subtopic: Both; Disease: Diabetic foot
InterventionLeucopatch, topical application of a fibrin/white cell/platelet patch prepared by the Leucopatch device
Study Entry : Registration and One or More Randomisations
Intervention typeDevice
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
Phase
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)
Primary outcome measureUlcer healing; Timepoint(s): 20 weeks after randomisation
Secondary outcome measuresAdded 05/01/2017:
Ulcer-related outcomes:
1. Time (days) to healing in those that heal by 20 weeks
2. The incidence of healing within 12 and 26 weeks
3. Change in ulcer area at 4, 12, 16, 20 and 26 weeks
4. Change in ulcer healing rate between the run-in-period and the first four weeks in the treatment period
5. The incidence of secondary infection
6. Number of days of systemic antibiotic therapy administered for infection of foot ulcer during the 20 weeks from randomisation
7. Durability of wound healing 12 weeks after complete wound healing

Patient-related outcomes:
1. The incidence of major (above ankle) amputation affecting the target limb by 12, 20 and 26 weeks
2. The incidence of major amputation affecting the contralateral limb by 26 weeks
3. The incidence of minor (below ankle) amputation affecting the target limb by 12, 20 and 26 weeks
4. The incidence of minor amputation affecting the contralateral limb
5. Quality-of-life measured using SF-12 and EQ-5D at baseline, 12 and 20 weeks
6. Pain measured by VAS
7. Incidence of new anaemia

Health economic analysis:
1. Cost effectiveness and cost utility
Overall study start date15/07/2013
Overall study end date31/05/2018

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 269; UK Sample Size: 150
Participant inclusion criteria1. People aged 18 years and over who have diabetes complicated by one or more ulcers on a foot or both feet below the level of the malleoli, excluding ulcers confined to the interdigital cleft
2. Those with more than one eligible ulcer will have one usually the largest or more clinically significant selected at screening as the index ulcer
3. Eligible ulcers will be hard-to-heal, meaning that the cross-sectional area will decrease by less than 50 % during a four week run-in period
4. HbA1c ≤108 mmol/mol at screening
5. The cross-sectional area of the index ulcer will be between ≥50 and ≤1000 mm2 at the end of the 4 week run-in period
6. At randomisation, the index ulcer will be clinically non-infected according to IDSA criteria
7. Either the ankle-brachial index (ABPI) in the affected limb will be between 0.50 and 1.40 or the dorsalis pedis pulse and/or tibialis posterior pulse will be palpable
8. Participants will have the capacity to understand study procedures, and will be able to provided written informed consent
Target Gender: Male & Female ; Lower Age Limit 18 years
Participant exclusion criteriaCurrent exclusion criteria as of 05/01/2017:
1. Haemoglobin concentration <105 g/L or 6.5 mmol/L at screening
2. Presence of sickle-cell anaemia, haemophilia, thrombocytopenia (<100x109/L) or other clinically significant blood dyscrasia
3. Known potential infectivity of blood products, including known HIV and hepatitis
4. Dialysis or an estimated GFR (based on cystatine C or serum creatinine) <20 ml/min/1.73m2
5. Increase in cross-sectional area of the index ulcer by ≥25% during the 4 week run-in period, or is either smaller than 50 mm2 or larger than 1000 mm2 at the end of that time
6. Clinical signs of infection of the index ulcer or reason to suspect that infection is present at randomisation.
7. Revascularisation procedure in the affected limb planned, or undertaken within the 4 weeks prior to screening
8. Current treatment with cytotoxic drugs or with systemically administered glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressants.
9. Treatment of foot ulcers with growth factors, stem cells or equivalent preparation within the 8 weeks prior to screening
10. The need for continued use of negative pressure wound therapy
11. Likely inability to comply with the need for weekly visits because of planned activity
12. Participation in another interventional clinical foot ulcer-healing trial within the 4 weeks prior to screening
13. Prior randomisation in this trial
14. Judgement by the investigator that the patient does not have the capacity to understand the study procedures or provide written informed consent

Previous exclusion criteria:
1. Haemoglobin concentration <105 g/L or 6.5 mmol/L at screening
2. Presence of sickle-cell anaemia, haemophilia, thrombocytopenia (<100x109/L) or other clinically significant blood dyscrasia
3. Known potential infectivity of blood products, including known HIV and hepatitis
4. Dialysis or an estimated GFR (based on cystatine C or serum creatinine) <20 ml/min/1.73m2
5. Increase in cross-sectional area of the index ulcer by ≥25% during the 4 week run-in period, or is either smaller than 50 mm2 or larger than 1000 mm2 at the end of that time
6. Revascularisation procedure in the affected limb planned, or undertaken within the 4 weeks prior to screening
7. Current treatment with cytotoxic drugs or with systemically administered glucocorticoids
8. Treatment of foot ulcers with growth factors, stem cells or equivalent preparation within the 8 weeks prior to screening
9. Likely inability to comply with the need for weekly visits because of planned activity
10. Participation in another interventional clinical foot ulcer-healing trial within the 4 weeks prior to screening
11. Prior enrolment in this trial
12. Judgement by the investigator that the patient does not have the capacity to understand the study procedures or provide written informed consent
Recruitment start date15/07/2013
Recruitment end date31/05/2017

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Denmark
  • England
  • Sweden
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Clinical Trials Unit
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Nottingham Health Science Partners
Queens Medical Centre
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
England
United Kingdom

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05y3qh794

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Reapplix (Denmark)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/11/2018 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

27/09/2018: Publication reference added.
05/01/2017: the following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial end date was changed from 30/01/2016 to 31/05/2018.
2. The target number of participants was changed from 'Planned Sample Size: 250; UK Sample Size: 150' to 'Planned Sample Size: 269; UK Sample Size: 150'.
3. Denmark and Sweden were added to the countries of recruitment.