Microwave endometrial ablation versus thermal balloon endometrial ablation - a pragmatic randomised comparison of postmenstrual treatment under general or local anaesthesia: clinical outcomes, patient acceptability and cost

ISRCTN ISRCTN28184453
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN28184453
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
20/12/2006
Registration date
21/02/2007
Last edited
03/05/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Dr Kevin Cooper
Scientific

Gynaecology Department
Ward 42
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1224 554800
Email Kevin.Cooper@arh.grampian.scot.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe aim of the study is to compare Microwave Endometrial Ablation (MEA) with Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation (TBEA) under general or local anaesthesia in the postmenstrual phase in an adequately powered prospective randomised trial.
Ethics approval(s)Grampian Research Ethics Committee on 24/10/2002 (ref: 02/0232)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMenorrhagia
InterventionEndometrial ablation (MEA) with thermal balloon endometrial ablation (TBEA).

Microwave Endometrial Ablation
MEA uses microwave energy, which emanates from the probe tip to effectively ‘paint’ the inside of the uterus with microwave energy. The MEA causes endometrial destruction to a predictable depth through a tissue heating effect. The procedure itself lasts two to three minutes on average and utilises an 8.5 mm probe.

Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation
TBEA (Thermachoice, Gynecare Inc) uses a balloon that is filled with a 5% Dextrose solution that is heated to provide the Endometrial effect. It uses a 5mm catheter, which requires to be introduced into the uterus prior to inflation. The balloon probe is significantly smaller than the MEA probe and may offer advantages through reduced need for cervical dilation. Unlike the microwave technique, apart from siting the device and ensuring that normal operating pressures are achieved, there is no operator input required for the balloon treatment phase, which lasts eight minutes.

A clinical research fellow of specialist registrar level performed all procedures in theatre. All procedures were performed under general or local anaesthesia plus or minus sedation in day case theatre.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureClinical outcome using satisfaction levels and menstrual scores (including amenorrhoea rates) after each procedure.
Secondary outcome measures1. Operative details and treatment acceptability
2. Quality of life
3. Health service costs of Microwave Endometrial Ablation to Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation
Overall study start date01/01/2004
Completion date30/04/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexFemale
Target number of participants320
Key inclusion criteriaWomen in the catchment area of Aberdeen Royal Infirmary with dysfunctional uterine bleeding who:
1. Have completed their family
2. Have normal endometrial pathology
3. Have a regular uterus cavity
4. Are willing to be randomised to microwave endometrial ablation or thermal balloon endometrial ablation under local anaesthesia
Key exclusion criteria1. Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
2. Those who in the opinion of the attending physician are thought to have limited life expectancy (less than one year)
3. Patients who currently or have within the last three months been involved with another research project
Date of first enrolment01/01/2004
Date of final enrolment30/04/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Gynaecology Department
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS Grampian (UK)
Government

Research & Development Office
Foresterhill House Annexe
Foresterhill
Aberdeen
AB25 2ZB
United Kingdom

Website http://www.nhsgrampian.org
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00ma0mg56

Funders

Funder type

Government

Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Executive Health Department (UK) (ref: CZH/4/117)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2009 Yes No
Other publications cost utility analysis 01/08/2010 Yes No