The PErineal Assessment and Repair Longitudinal Study (PEARLS): a national quality improvement initiative to improve the assessment and immediate, short and long term management of perineal trauma

ISRCTN ISRCTN28960026
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN28960026
Secondary identifying numbers 07/MRE12/2
Submission date
20/08/2007
Registration date
26/03/2008
Last edited
27/09/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Ms Sue Macdonald
Scientific

15 Mansfield Street
London
W1G 9NH
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)207 312 3468
Email Sue.Macdonald@rcm.org.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial using a matched pair cluster design. Maternity units are the unit of randomisation.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details provided in the Interventions field to request a patient information sheet.
Scientific title
Study acronymPEARLS
Study objectivesThat the provision of an evidence based training package and its delivery to practitioners will lead to better outcomes for women following perineal trauma.
Ethics approval(s)Thames Valley Research Ethics Committee, University of Reading. Approved in February 2007.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPerineal trauma
InterventionA paired cluster design trial investigating the intervention of an evidence based, standardised training package delivered to midwives and obstetricians, in the assessment and management of perineal trauma. Twenty-four maternity units have been recruited and matched into 12 pairs. The training intervention will initially commence in one unit in each 'pair' (Group A) with it's matched partner continuing to provide usual care (Group B).

All women in participating units will receive written information antenatally, at around 36 weeks. Following birth, further information about the study will be provided, and informed consent obtained on the Labour Ward, or prior to discharge. Women who participate will receive a pack to take home including a covering letter, 10-12 day questionnaire and a Self Addressed Envelope (SAE). Following receipt of the first questionnaire, the second questionnaire will be sent with an SAE at 3 months.

Main study outcomes will be assessed at three months following cascading of the intervention in Group A units. The intervention will then be cascaded among Group B units.

Please use the following contact details to request a patient information sheet:
Sue Tohill/ Linda Lucking
PEARLS Central Office
Academic Unit of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
University Hospital of North Staffordshire
Newcastle Road
Stoke on Trent, ST4 6QG, UK
Linda Lucking:
Tel: +44 (0)1782 552484; Fax: +44 (0)1782 552472; Email: Linda.Lucking@uhns.nhs.uk
Sue Tohill:
Tel: +44 (0)7880 942330; Email: sue.tohill@rcm-pearls.org
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure21/03/2013: The previous primary outcome measures were incorrect due to an error at the time of registration. The correct primary outcome measure is as follows:
Experience of perineal pain on daily activity at 10-12 days post birth.

Previous primary outcome measures until 21/03/2013:
Women's perspectives on what they consider important in the quality and experience of their care:
1. Infection and antibiotic treatment
2. Pain
3. Healing
4. Continence
Secondary outcome measures21/03/2013: The previous secondary outcome measures were incorrect due to an error at the time of registration. The correct secondary outcome measures are as follows:
1. 10 - 12 days post birth:
1.1. severity of perineal pain
1.2. need for suture removal
1.3. use of pain relief duirng the previous 24 hours
1.4. uptake and duration of exclusive breastfeeding
1.5. perineal wound infection
2. Three months post birth:
2.1. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS [14])
score of ≥ 13
2.2 timing of resumption of intercourse
2.3. satisfaction with the perineal repair.
2.4. duration of exclusive breastfeeding

Previous secondary outcome measures until 21/03/2013:
1. Maternal physical and psychological well-being, assessed by the 10 day and 3 month questionnaires:
1.1. Incidence of perineal pain
1.2. Use of postpartum analgesia
1.3. Perineal wound infection
1.4. Uptake and duration of breastfeeding
2. Proportion of women who have an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score of greater than or equal to 13 at 3 months.
Overall study start date01/12/2005
Completion date01/02/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants1,000
Key inclusion criteriaAll women who sustain a second degree perineal tear or episiotomy in a participating unit during the study period will be eligible. To avoid problems with selection biases, overall outcomes for the centre will be ascertained using audit data from birth records. All births during a prespecified period will contribute to these analyses.
Key exclusion criteria1. Women under 16 years of age
2. Non-English speakers
3. Those who have suffered pregnancy loss
Date of first enrolment01/12/2005
Date of final enrolment01/02/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

15 Mansfield Street
London
W1G 9NH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Royal College of Midwives (UK)
University/education

c/o Mrs Louise Silverton
Deputy General Secretary
15 Mansfield Street
London
W1G 9NH
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)207 312 3535
Email louise.silverton@rcm.org.uk
Website http://www.rcm.org.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01swa5m73

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Health Foundation - Quality Improvement Initiative (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 25/02/2010 Yes No
Results article results 23/09/2013 Yes No