Randomised Exposure Study of Pollution Indoors and Respiratory Effects (RESPIRE): the effect of reducing exposure to smoke from traditional woodstoves on child pneumonia in rural Guatemala

ISRCTN ISRCTN29007942
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN29007942
Secondary identifying numbers NIEHS #R01ES010178
Submission date
22/09/2009
Registration date
14/10/2009
Last edited
16/11/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Prof Kirk R Smith
Scientific

School of Public Health
University of California
Berkeley
94720-7360
United States of America

Phone +1 510 643 0793
Email krksmith@berkeley.edu

Study information

Study designSingle centre randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeScreening
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleWoodsmoke exposure and childhood acute lower respiratory infections in Guatemala: a randomised intervention
Study acronymRESPIRE
Study objectivesAcute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) incidence in children and pollution exposure will be reduced in the intervention group (children who reside in a household with a chimney woodstove) versus the control group (children who reside in a household that uses an open woodfire for cooking and heating).

Acute lower respiratory infections (ALRI) are the chief killer of children. Most cases are pneumonia and the majority occur among poor children under five years in developing countries. Poverty might be said to be the primary cause, which manifests as malnutrition, including micro-nutrient deficiencies, and lack of access to medical care. Another attribute of poverty is household indoor air pollution (HAP) from use of unprocessed solid fuels such as biomass (wood, animal dung and crop wastes) and coal in simple stoves. A meta-analysis of published observational studies found that young children exposed to smoke from household solid fuel use had a rate of ALRI twice that of children not exposed or where clean fuels were used. Recent studies have shown similar ALRI risks associated with short-term air pollution measurements and other indicators of exposure.

The substantial indoor concentrations of important health-damaging pollutants which result from the use of these fuels are thought to explain the relationship with ALRI. As with tobacco smoke, there are thousands of compounds in gaseous and aerosol forms found in biomass fuel smoke, including dozens with effects that include immune system suppression, severe irritation, inflammation, cilia toxicity, and carcinogenicity. Small particles are typically used as an indicator of the health risk for these mixtures, and in households using biomass fuels without effective chimneys are typically found in concentrations 10 to 100 times higher than health-based guidelines.

Viral agents play an important role in ALRI, although it is thought that most deaths occur through bacterial infection, which may occur with or without initial viral infection. Of the viral agents, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common, although its importance varies by season. Evidence to date about the relationship between solid fuel smoke pollution and risk of RSV illness, is conflicting. One study from the Gambia reported reduced risk of severe RSV illness with higher exposure to cooking smoke, raising the possibility of a differential effect on viral and bacterial ALRI.

The evidence from existing studies of ALRI risk associated with solid fuel use is limited by a range of methodological issues. All used observational designs which carry the inherent difficulty of residual confounding from the association between solid fuels and other poverty-related ALRI risk factors, particularly nutrition. Studies used a mix of hospital and community-based case-finding: those using the latter will have had particular difficulty distinguishing lower respiratory tract infections from acute upper respiratory tract infections (AURI). This is important as the more common AURI may have a quite different relationship with air pollution, and is not responsible for significant morbidity or mortality. Since few studies have assessed indicators of ALRI severity (e.g. hypoxaemia), and none has attempted to differentiate all ALRI by aetiologic agent (viral versus bacterial), it has not been possible to assess the impact of HAP on factors known to increase case fatality. Almost none of the studies carried out pollution assessment, relying instead on indirect exposure indicators such as fuel or stove type, or whether a child is carried on the mother's back during cooking - methods which are inevitably associated with substantial exposure misclassification. Finally, lack of blinding may have led to bias.
Ethics approval(s)1. Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects, University of California Berkeley, approved in October 2002 and renewed anuually (ref: 2003-8-165)
2. Institutional Review Board, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Government, approved in August 2002 (ref: 3452)
3. Ethics Committee Review Board, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, approved on the 11th October 2002 and renewed annually
4. Research Ethics Committee, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, approved on the 10th October 2001 and renewed annually (ref: 01.68)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAcute respiratory tract infection (ARI) in children under 18 months
InterventionThe intervention group was offered a chimney stove (plancha) at the beginning of the study. The improved chimney stove was locally made, well-liked by people in the community, and the stove of choice for both independent buyers and community stove programmes. Pilot work confirmed that the plancha met all cooking and space-heating needs, achieved a 8 - 10 fold reduction in kitchen pollution levels and (depending on design, condition and how it was used) a modest saving in wood fuel in everyday use.

The control group continued to use the traditional open fire, in effect with no change to usual practice. All control households were offered an improved stove to be installed on completion of household surveillance (when child reached 18 months).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePhysician-diagnosed pneumonia in children through 18 months of age. Pneumonia case finding and management were based on the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Strategy, developed by World Health Organization (WHO)/United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). This approach was selected because:
1. Experience has demonstrated that locally recruited field staff can be trained to assess ALRI and other common conditions using this method
2. In terms of case definition, it is sufficiently valid and consistent with most other recent population-based field studies of ALRI
3. There are well developed training materials and procedures for both case finding and management
4. It integrates case finding with clinically effective management of sick children

Child health outcomes were assessed through weekly home visits by trained field workers, with referral to study physicians working in local community centres to maintain blindness to interventions status for clinical examination. Follow-up of children were from age at initial recruitment (birth to 4 months) until they reached 18 months of age. The fieldworkers, trained in IMCI, assessed and identified all children with rapid breathing, in addition to other signs of ALRI and the WHO-defined general danger signs. The rationale for carrying out the home visits at weekly intervals was based on the duration of pneumonia, in particular the duration of visible signs (principally fast breathing and chest indrawing). Estimates of this vary and depend on definitions of when an episode finishes. Weekly visits allowed almost all cases of ALRI to be identified through direct observation of the sick child, with a minority by mother's recall of the most relevant signs. Maternal recall of these signs does not have a high sensitivity and specificity, and was kept to a minimum.

Children meeting criteria for possible ALRI (or other significant illness) were referred to one of the study doctors who carried out a clinical examination including pulse oximetry. All children with a diagnosis of pneumonia were offered a direct antigen test for RSV, and a chest X-ray). Chest X-rays were carried out initially at San Marcos Hospital and subsequently at a private clinic to ensure quality control, normally within 24 - 48 hours of the initial assessment by the study doctor, subject to parental consent. All X-rays images were stored (scanned), and read by independent reviewers, blind to intervention status, using WHO training software and procedures. Children meeting the criteria for referral to hospital were admitted (subject to parental consent) to San Marcos hospital. All children admitted with suspected pneumonia received a chest X-ray, as per usual practice at this hospital. All children diagnosed with ALRI or other severe conditions by study MDs were offered free treatment under normal medical protocols.

Definition of new episodes:
New episodes were defined, drawing on current practice for ALRI field studies, as follows:
1. A sick child meeting the criteria for ALRI less than 15 days after apparent recovery from an earlier episode is regarded as a relapse of the first episode
2. A sick child meeting the ALRI criteria 15 or more days after apparent recovery from an earlier episode is regarded as a new episode

Severity:
The severity of the illness as determined by field workers was categorised according to the symptoms and signs included in the IMCI algorithm. Severe FW-cases were those with chest indrawing and/or the most reliably described general danger sign, that is inability to breast-feed or drink. Severity of all physician-diagnosed outcomes was determined by the level of oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry. A cut off of 87% was taken, based on the established definition of this being 2 standard deviations below the mean level for a representative group of well children in the study sample. The relatively low level reflects the altitude of the study site (mean 2,600 metres).
Secondary outcome measuresDerived from the case finding methods described above:
1. ARI outcomes based on field worker assessments in the home:
1.1. Acute upper respiratory infections
1.2. All ALRI
1.3. Severe ALRI
2. ARI outcomes based on physician diagnosis and investigations:
2.1. Severe (hypoxaemic) physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.2. All RSV positive physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.3. Severe (hypoxaemic) RSV positive physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.4. All RSV negative physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.5. Severe (hypoxaemic) RSV negative physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.6. All chest X-ray positive physician-diagnosed pneumonia
2.7. Severe (hypoxaemic) chest X-ray positive physician-diagnosed pneumonia
3. Outcomes based on verbal autopsies:
3.1. All deaths
3.2. Deaths due to pneumonia
4. Other child health outcomes:
4.1. Diarrhoea
4.2. Birth weight
4.3. Burns and scalds
Overall study start date19/10/2002
Completion date18/12/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexBoth
Target number of participants500 children
Key inclusion criteria1. Households used only an open fire for cooking and heating
2. Had a pregnant woman or child less than 4 months residing in the home
3. Identified as Mam (the regional ethnic group)
4. Minimal summer migration (less than 12 weeks per year)
Key exclusion criteria1. The household is already using a chimney stove for cooking
2. There is no child less than 4 months of age or a pregnant woman residing in the home
3. Seasonal migration required the family to move to another region for more than 12 weeks of the year
Date of first enrolment19/10/2002
Date of final enrolment18/12/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Guatemala
  • United States of America

Study participating centre

School of Public Health
Berkeley
94720-7360
United States of America

Sponsor information

National Institutes of Health (NIH) (USA) - National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Government

P.O. Box 12233, MD K3-16
Research Triangle Park, NC
27709-2233
United States of America

Website http://www.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00j4k1h63

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institutes of Health (NIH) (USA) - National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (ref: R01ES010178)

No information available

World Health Organization (WHO) (Switzerland)
Private sector organisation / International organizations
Alternative name(s)
منظمة الصحة العالمية, 世界卫生组织, Всемирная организация здравоохранения, Organisation mondiale de la Santé, Organización Mundial de la Salud, WHO, 世卫组织, ВОЗ, OMS
Location
Switzerland
The AC Griffin Family Trust (USA)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Abstract results 01/11/2006 No No
Results article results 01/01/2007 Yes No
Results article blood pressure results 01/07/2007 Yes No
Results article pneumonia case findings results 01/07/2007 Yes No
Results article mapping results 01/10/2007 Yes No
Results article lung function results 01/12/2007 Yes No
Results article self-rated health results 05/06/2008 Yes No
Results article exposure information results 01/01/2009 Yes No
Results article results 15/07/2009 Yes No
Results article 13/10/2009 Yes No
Results article methods and results 01/07/2010 Yes No
Results article results 12/11/2011 Yes No