Evaluating the effects of earplug placement intervention on sleep quality in patients in an intensive care unit
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN29988120 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN29988120 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | IRB105-119-A |
- Submission date
- 19/01/2020
- Registration date
- 22/01/2020
- Last edited
- 21/01/2020
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Nervous System Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) commonly encounter sleep impaired by noise, light, treatments, nursing activities, and other factors, which jeopardizes their recovery. Nonpharmacological interventions have been applied in ICUs to establish a supportive sleep environment; however, the effectiveness of these interventions is uncertain. More rigorous studies with objective measures of outcome parameters are needed. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of an intervention involving earplug placement during nocturnal sleep in ICU patients without ventilators.
Who can participate?
Patients aged < 20 years, conscious, able to read and communicate, and have a stay in the ICU that was expected to be more than 48 hours.
What does the study involve?
Participants were randomly allocated to use earplugs or not during the hours of 10pm and 7am on the second night of their stay in the ICU.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Patients have the chance to help the development of scientific knowledge by contributing to the study. Patients in the intervention group might not feel comfortable due to the earplug placement. However, there are no life-threatening side effects to the earplug placement.
Where is the study run from?
Tzu Chi University (Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital), Taiwan R.O.C.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2017 to December 2018
Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded
Who is the main contact?
Prof Hui-Ling Lai
snowjade@mail.tcu.edu.tw
Contact information
Scientific
Tzu Chi University
No. 707, Section 3, Zhongyang Rd.
Hualien
97004
Taiwan
 ORCID ID |
0000-0002-4853-981X |
|---|---|
| Phone | +886 970332631 |
| snowjade@mail.tcu.edu.tw |
Study information
| Study design | Single-center randomized controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Hospital |
| Study type | Prevention |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Evaluating the effects of an evidence-based earplug placement intervention on sleep quality in patients in an intensive care unit |
| Study objectives | There will be a difference in the slopes of regression lines for the outcome parameters between those who use earplugs at bedtime and those who do not |
| Ethics approval(s) | Approved 01/01/2017, Research Ethics Committee of Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital (No. 707, Section 3, Zhongyang Rd., Hualien, 97004, Taiwan R.O.C.; +886-3-8561825 ext. 13271; IRB@tzuchi.com.tw), ref: IRB105-119-A |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Sleep disturbance |
| Intervention | A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of earplug placement alone on perceived sleep quality, urinary melatonin level, and relaxation responses including respiratory rate, heart rate, and MAP in ICU patients. The experimental group received an earplug intervention, and the control group received usual care. Participants’ vital signs were recorded continuously during the ICU stay. Earplug administration and urine collection were between 10 pm and 7 am. On the admission day, all participants were asked to recall their sleep conditions at home prior to admission (Day 0) by using the RCSQ. After baseline data were collected, participants were instructed to draw a random lot from an opaque jar that had 110 lots to determine which group they would be assigned to. Thus, the researchers were blinded to the randomization. Upon admission day following enrollment, a researcher attached physiologic monitors to each participant. The monitors continuously monitored vital signs during the ICU stay. On the first and second night after enrollment, the frequency of nursing activities occurring between 10 pm and 7 am was recorded every hour on the nursing activity checklist by patients’ primary RN. On the second and third day at 10 am, the researcher asked the patients to answer the RCSQ questions. Each item was read aloud by the author (YC) to the patients. The answers were indicated by the patients’ writing or by the author. The research intervention was the use of earplugs. The intervention was delivered on Day 2 between 10 pm and 7 am. The earplugs used in the study were disposable polyurethane foam earplugs with a push-in, bell shape feature that matches the contours of the inner ear to protect hearing, with a maximum noise reduction of 33 dB (MAX-30, Howard Leight). The earplugs were selected and placed by the first author at nocturnal sleep time. Participants in the control group received the usual care. Patients were informed that if they did not want to continue wearing the earplugs, then they were free to remove them. Immediately after completing the study, participants in the intervention group were asked to describe their feeling regarding the use of earplugs. The control group was only provided with regular care. Vital signs were recorded every 30 min between 10 pm and 7 am on Day 2 and Day 3. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
| Phase | Not Applicable |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Earplugs |
| Primary outcome measure | 1. Sleep quality measured using the Chinese version of the Richards–Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) at home prior to admission, at Day 1 (baseline), and at Day 2 (after the intervention) 2. Urinary melatonin (MT6s) level measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS; ACQUITY QDa, Waters Corp. MA, USA) at Day 1 (baseline), and at Day 2 between 10 pm and 7 am 3. Vital signs measured using a physiologic monitor (GE CARESCAPE Central Station, MA, USA), continuously measured during the ICU stay. The values of the vital signs were retrieved at 30-min intervals during the intervention night: 3.1. Respiratory rate 3.2. Heart rate 3.3. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) |
| Secondary outcome measures | N/A |
| Overall study start date | 01/01/2017 |
| Completion date | 31/12/2018 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 107 |
| Total final enrolment | 107 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged < 20 years 2. Conscious 3. Able to read and communicate 4. Have a stay in the ICU that was expected to be more than 48 h |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Use of sedatives 2. Cognitive or hearing impairment 3. Mechanical ventilation or physical restraints |
| Date of first enrolment | 04/04/2017 |
| Date of final enrolment | 20/10/2018 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Taiwan
Study participating centre
Hualien
97004
Taiwan
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
No. 707, Section 3, Zhongyang Rd.
Hualien
97004
Taiwan
| Phone | +886 38565301 |
|---|---|
| IRB@tzuchi.com.tw | |
| Website | https://bioit.trc.ibms.sinica.edu.tw/hualien-irb |
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/030k6vb67 |
Funders
Funder type
Other
No information available
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 15/04/2020 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
| Publication and dissemination plan | The study results will be submitted to a nursing journal. |
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available upon request from Hui-Ling Lai (snowjade@mail.tcu.edu.tw) on scientific uses immediately following publication with end date 31/12/2023. |
Editorial Notes
21/01/2020: Trial’s existence confirmed by Research Ethics Committee of Hualien Tzu Chi General Hospital.
