Variation of radiotherapy target volume definition, dose to organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes using anatomic (CT) versus combined anatomic and molecular imaging (PET-CT): Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy delivered using a Tomotherapy Hi Art machine

ISRCTN ISRCTN33175361
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33175361
Secondary identifying numbers 7341
Submission date
29/04/2010
Registration date
29/04/2010
Last edited
12/12/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

http://cancerhelp.cancerresearchuk.org/trials/a-study-see-pet-scans-help-improve-radiotherapy-treatment-planning-oropharyngeal-cancer-vortigern

Contact information

Dr Sanjoy Chatterjee
Scientific

Northern Centre for Cancer Care
Freeman Hospital
Freeman Road
High Heaton
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designNon-randomised interventional treatment trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designNon randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleVariation of radiotherapy target volume definition, dose to organs at risk (OAR) and clinical target volumes using anatomic (CT) versus combined anatomic and molecular imaging (PET-CT): Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy delivered using a Tomotherapy Hi Art machine
Study acronymVortigERn
Study objectives30 patients with head and neck cancer who are being treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) will be recruited in the study. Patients willing to give consent to participate will be asked to have a contrast enhanced positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT) scan. The CT scan data will then be used to define the CTV1 and CTV2 for IMRT treatment (as per agreed protocol) as standard. A computer based IMRT plan will be generated for optimal treatment of the patient using the CT information only. The patient will be treated on the basis of this.
Ethics approval(s)MREC approved on the 20/10/2008 (ref: 08/H0907/127)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: National Cancer Research Network; Subtopic: All Cancers/Misc Sites; Disease: Unknown Primary Site
InterventionStandard pre-radiotherapy planning imaging is with a contrast enhanced CT scan. In the study all patients were required to have a 18 FDG PET-CT scan in the treatment position.

Study entry: registration only
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTo explore if the FDG PET CT based radiotherapy target volumes are different to that of CT scan
Secondary outcome measuresFeasibility of dose escalation in tumour volumes in oropharyngeal SCC.
Overall study start date01/05/2009
Completion date02/03/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNot Specified
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 30
Key inclusion criteria1. Tumours of oropharynx area in the head and neck
2. Have involved or uninvolved neck nodes
3. Being treated with tomotherapy IMRT
4. Either sex
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/05/2009
Date of final enrolment02/03/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Northern Centre for Cancer Care
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Freeman Hospital
Freeman Road
High Heaton
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.newcastle-hospitals.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05p40t847

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Royal College of Radiologists (UK)
Private sector organisation / Associations and societies (private and public)
Alternative name(s)
The Royal College of Radiologists, RCR
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2012 Yes No

Editorial Notes

12/12/2017: Publication reference added.