A randomised comparison of two techniques for inflation of the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA) during anaesthesia

ISRCTN ISRCTN33777350
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33777350
Protocol serial number N0212157341
Sponsor Department of Health
Funder Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust (UK)
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
04/06/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Kim Gupta
Scientific

Anaesthesia
Royal United Hospital
B&NES
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised comparison of two techniques for inflation of the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA) during anaesthesia
Study objectivesIs there any difference in performance of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) when using either of the 2 techniques of cuff inflation described?
Ethics approval(s)Bath Research Ethics Committee, 24/03/2005, ref: 05/Q2001/31
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSurgery: Anaesthesia
InterventionTechnique 1 vs technique 2 for inflation of the Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (CLMA) during anaesthesia
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)

Added 22/07/2008:
1. Airway seal pressure
2. Composite measures of adequacy of airway device placement

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Added 22/07/2008:
1. Composite measures to assess functional adequacy of airway device
2. Volume of air in LMA cuff at on removal
3. Initial cuff pressure after syringe inflation
4. Composite measures of pharyngeal trauma

Completion date01/07/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration130
Key inclusion criteriaAdult patients presenting to RUH for day case and minor in-patient operations who meet the inclusion criteria for the trial and who are to be anaesthetised by any of the investigators.
All patients who are having an anaesthetic where the CLMA would be expected to be the airway used are suitable to be recruited. We will study 130 adult patients (American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status 1 - 3 age >16 years) undergoing non-emergency surgery in the supine or lithotomy position under general anaesthesia with spontaneous respiration during maintenance of anaesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients will not be studied if they have any pathology of the neck
2. At risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents
3. Unable to understand the study or give informed consent to take part
4. We will not study patients weighing less than 35 kg or greater than 120 kg
Date of first enrolment24/02/2005
Date of final enrolment01/07/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Royal United Hospital
Bath
BA1 3NG
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes