The effects of strength training on muscle strength, asymmetry in lower limb muscle strength and mobility in older men and women with a history of hip fracture

ISRCTN ISRCTN34271567
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN34271567
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
01/06/2006
Registration date
13/07/2006
Last edited
06/02/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Ms Erja Portegijs
Scientific

Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Gerontology
Department of Health Sciences
University of Jyväskylä
P.O. Box 35 (viv)
Jyväskylä
FI-40014
Finland

Email erja.portegijs@sport.jyu.fi

Study information

Study designA randomised controlled trial; men and women randomised in blocks. Data collected in two phases using the exact same protocol equipment and staff.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesOlder people with a history of hip fracture often have generally low muscle strength and power in the lower limbs, especially on the fractured side, which may result in mobility limitations. This considerable asymmetrical deficit may further complicate balance and independent living.

Progressive strength-power training may increase muscle strength and power. Taking into account asymmetrical deficit in the lower limbs may lead to larger improvements in mobility function in older people than conventional strength training.
Ethics approval(s)The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Jyväskylä Central Hospital Board on 14/10/2004
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHip fracture
InterventionParticipants assigned to the intervention groups, participated twice a week in a 12-week progressive strength-power training specifically designed to increase lower limb muscle strength and power and to reduce asymmetry in lower limb strength and power. Resistance equipment was used to train: leg press, knee flexion, hip abduction and adduction exercises, in addition, plantar flexion exercise was provided by means of a weighted vest. The one repetition maximum (1 RM; calculated from the observed 3-5 RM) for the exercises used in the training was assessed twice during the training. The resistance of the strength training (usual velocity) was progressively increased from 50 to 80 % of the 1RM of the respective leg. Leg press and plantar flexion exercises were trained in addition with high-velocity low-load resistance (power training). For these exercises, the number of repetitions was progressively increased. In order to equalise muscle strength and power asymmetry between the legs, the weaker leg was trained with more sets of repetitions and/or a higher percentage of resistance. The training was supervised by an experienced physiotherapist.

The participants assigned to the control group were encouraged to continue their lives as they were used to.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Maximal muscle strength and power in both legs:
1.1. Voluntary isometric knee extension strength
1.2. Rate of force production
1.3. Leg extension power (Nottingham power-rig)
2. The strength and power difference between the legs (asymmetry)
3. Mobility (habitual and maximal walking velocity and other walking parameters, such as step length and time
4. Time of walking a figure 8
5. Ability and time to climb stairs
6. Timed-up-go test
7. Chair rise ability and time
Secondary outcome measures1. Balance:
1.1. Static and dynamic balance measured on a force plate
1.2. Functional balance (Berg balance scale)
1.3. Self-assessed balance confidence (ABC scale)
2. Falls (collected retrospectively and by means of a prospective follow-up)
3. Disability
4. Pain in the legs
5. Bone density and geometry of tibia (peripheral computed tomography)
Overall study start date01/06/2004
Completion date31/12/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants30 participants in each group (60 in total)
Key inclusion criteriaCommunity-dwelling 60 - 85-year-old men and women living in the Jyvaskyla Central Hospital District that had an operation following a hip fracture, from six months to seven years earlier
Key exclusion criteriaThe criteria of American College of Sports Medicine (e.g. severe cardiovascular disease) were used to exclude people from participation in the randomized controlled trial. Additionally, severe progressive (e.g. cancer) or neurological disease (e.g. advanced Alzheimer's disease), lower limb amputation, inability to walk outside without assistance of another person and alcohol abuse were used as exclusion criteria for this study.
Date of first enrolment01/06/2004
Date of final enrolment31/12/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Finland

Study participating centre

Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Gerontology
Jyväskylä
FI-40014
Finland

Sponsor information

Ministry of Education Finland
Government

PL 29
00023 Valtioneuvosto
Helsinki
FI-00023
Finland

Email opmkirjaamo@minedu.fi
Website http://www.minedu.fi
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02w52zt87

Funders

Funder type

Government

Ministry of Education (Finland)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea, 교육부, MOE
Location
Korea, South
Finnish Cultural Foundation (Finland)
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Finnish Cultural Foundation, SKR
Location
Finland
Juho Vainio Foundation (Finland)
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Juho Vainio Foundation, Reppy Institute
Location
Finland

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/09/2008 Yes No
Results article results 01/12/2012 Yes No