Colposuspension or tension free vaginal tape with anterior repair for urinary incontinence and prolapse: a pilot study

ISRCTN ISRCTN34759911
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN34759911
Secondary identifying numbers UHL 9967
Submission date
27/03/2006
Registration date
17/05/2006
Last edited
07/10/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Douglas Tincello
Scientific

Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building (RKCSB)
Leicester Royal Infirmary
P.O. Box 65
Leicester
LE2 7LX
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)116 252 5813
Email dgt4@le.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised patient preference trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymCARPET 1
Study objectivesRetropubic colposuspension is more effective than a Tension free Vaginal Tape (TVT) insertion with anterior vaginal repair for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence and anterior vaginal prolapse.

Please note that, as of 08/09/2008, the anticipated end date of this trial has been updated from 30/04/2008 to 25/04/2008.

Please note that, as of 16/01/2009, the anticipated end date has been updated from 25/04/2008 to 30/09/2007 (end of recruitment). The last patient completed follow up in November 2007.

As of 19/01/2009, the target number of participants was amended from 150 (estimate) to 31 (actual number recruited). Please note that identification of the number of eligible and willing patients was one of the aims of this pilot trial.
Ethics approval(s)Approved by Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire Ethics Committee Two, 29/11/2005, reference number: 05/Q2502 91
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrodynamic stress incontinence/ vaginal prolapse (anterior)
Intervention1. Colposuspension
2. Suburethal tension free vaginal tape with anterior vaginal repair
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Eligible patient numbers, by centre
2. Proportion of patients consenting to randomisation
3. Reasons for non-randomisation
4. Improvement in disease specific quality of life score at 6 weeks and 12 months
Secondary outcome measures1. Change in POP-Q score at 6 weeks and 12 months
2. Change in 24 hour pad test at 6 weeks and 12 months
3. Change in diary completed leakage episodes at 6 weeks and 12 months
4. Change in incidence of USI on urodynamics at follow up
5. Incidence of DOA on urodynamics at follow up at 12 months
Overall study start date01/05/2006
Completion date30/09/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants31
Key inclusion criteriaWomen with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) and anterior vaginal prolapse of stage II or more assessed by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score (POP-Q)
Key exclusion criteria1. Detrusor overactivity (DOA) on urodynamics
2. Previous incontinence or prolapse surgery
3. Apical or posterior vaginal prolapse of stage II or more on POP-Q
Date of first enrolment01/05/2006
Date of final enrolment30/09/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building (RKCSB)
Leicester
LE2 7LX
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Research Office
Leicester General Hospital
Gwendolen Road
Leicester
LE5 4PW
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)116 258 4109
Email nicola.turner@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02fha3693

Funders

Funder type

Government

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) (grant ref: 73379)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), UK Medical Research Council, MRC
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2009 Yes No