Assessment of the palatability of elemental nutritional supplements compared to non-elemental supplements in people with pelvic cancers and people without cancer, and whether this changes following treatment with radiotherapy
ISRCTN | ISRCTN35391431 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN35391431 |
Secondary identifying numbers | CCR2376 |
- Submission date
- 20/09/2005
- Registration date
- 21/11/2005
- Last edited
- 10/09/2012
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Jervoise Andreyev
Scientific
Scientific
Faculty of Medicine
Imperial College
Chelsea & Westminster Hospital
369 Fulham Road
London
SW10 9NH
United Kingdom
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Not specified |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | |
Study objectives | To assess in adults with pelvic cancers and in adults without cancer: 1. The inter- and intra observer variation in acceptability of a range of nutritional supplements 2. Whether patients experience a change in taste during a course of radical radiotherapy 3. Whether there is a difference in taste between adults with pelvic malignancies and healthy controls |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Pelvic (gynaecological, urological or rectal) cancers |
Intervention | Subjects were randomised to one of five groups. Each group was assigned a target quantity of 3 different elemental sip feeds (Group 1, 20%, Group 2, 50%, Group 3, 75% of calorie requirements taken as E028 extra liquid; Group 4, 50% of calorie requirements taken as E028 extra powder; Group 5, 50% of calorie requirements taken as Emsogen powder). |
Intervention type | Supplement |
Primary outcome measure | Taste assessed by visual analogue scale |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 26/01/2004 |
Completion date | 31/03/2006 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 50 |
Key inclusion criteria | Patients about to embark on a course of radical pelvic radiotherapy for pelvic malignancy |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Unwilling or unable to give informed consent to participate in the study 2. A clinical condition precluding oral feeding (e.g. dysphagia, bowel obstruction) 3. Unable to tolerate milk 4. Controls with a previous history of pelvic malignancy or currently receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy |
Date of first enrolment | 26/01/2004 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/03/2006 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Faculty of Medicine
London
SW10 9NH
United Kingdom
SW10 9NH
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Imperial College London (UK)
University/education
University/education
Faculty of Medicine
Imperial College
Chelsea & Westminster Hospital
369 Fulham Road
London
SW10 9NH
England
United Kingdom
https://ror.org/041kmwe10 |
Funders
Funder type
Industry
SHS International
No information available
Dr Andreyev's Personal Research Fund
No information available
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/02/2006 | Yes | No |