Impact of replacing conventional emergency department diagnostic procedures by a single-pass whole body computed tomography (pan-scan) on the survival of patients with severe trauma

ISRCTN ISRCTN35424832
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN35424832
Secondary identifying numbers ukb_PATRES_3.2_0711
Submission date
14/07/2011
Registration date
24/08/2011
Last edited
19/04/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Despite major improvements in emergency care, severe trauma, mainly due to road traffic crashes, falls, and assaults remains the leading cause of death in the industrialized countries. The rapid transfer of trauma victims to a specialized trauma centre is life-saving. On admission, the goal of diagnostic work-up is to identify life-threatening injuries, immediately followed by surgical and intensive care. The current diagnostic standard includes different imaging procedures like ultrasound, x-rays, and a cranial (head) computed tomography (CT) scan supplemented by CT scans of individual body regions as needed. In many trauma centres worldwide, this often time-consuming approach has now been replaced by a whole-body CT-scan, called the "pan-scan" for trauma. In theory, the pan-scan may detect injuries earlier and more precisely than the traditional stepwise procedure. Although compelling and plausible, there is a lack of evidence of whether the pan-scan benefits patients in terms of improved survival. The potential advantages of the pan-scan must also be traded-off against the increased exposure to radiation. The aim of this study is to find out whether the introduction of pan-scan into trauma resuscitation decreases mortality (death rate) for patients after severe blunt trauma compared to a conventional, staged work-up.

Who can participate?
Patients with suspected blunt multiple trauma requiring resuscitation in the emergency department/trauma bay

What does the study involve?
The outcomes of patients admitted before and after the introduction of pan-scan for severe trauma are compared. Mortality (death rate), adjusted for injury severity and other factors, morbidity (i.e. inflammatory complications like lung failure and multiple organ failure), and emergency department time are assessed.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
The University Trauma Centres in Murnau and Greifswald (Germany)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July to October 2011

Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded (Germany)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Dirk Stengel
zkf@ukb.de

Contact information

Dr Dirk Stengel
Scientific

Emergency Hospital Berlin (Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin)
Warener Str. 7
Berlin
12683
Germany

Phone +49 (0)30 5681 4090
Email zkf@ukb.de

Study information

Study designRetrospective cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEffectiveness of primary whole-body computed tomography (pan-scan) in improving process and outcome quality after severe and multiple trauma (The Pan-scan for Trauma Resuscitation Study, Part 3)
Study acronymPATRES-3
Study objectivesThe introduction of a single-pass whole-body, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (Pan-Scan) into trauma resuscitation decreases all-cause in hospital mortality of patients after severe blunt trauma compared to a conventional, staged work-up algorithm
Ethics approval(s)Bavarian Chamber of Physicians (Bayerische Landesärztekammer), 16/03/2010
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMultiple and severe blunt trauma
Intervention1. Control cohort: Trauma resuscitation and staged diagnostic work-up according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS(R)) standards including physical examination (ABCDE-algorithm), focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST, including thoracic views), plain x-rays of the chest, pelvis, and spine, cranial CT, followed by selective CT-scans of suspicious body regions
2. Intervention cohort: Trauma resuscitation and staged diagnostic work-up according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS(R)) standards, primary single-pass pan-scan
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureAll-cause in-hospital mortality
Secondary outcome measures1. All-cause in-hospital mortality, adjusted for injury severity and other confounding / interaction variables identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis
2. Morbidity (i.e. inflammatory complications like lung failure [ARDS] multiple organ failure [MOF])
3. Emergency department time
Overall study start date15/07/2011
Completion date01/10/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants300 per group
Key inclusion criteriaConsecutive men and women (no age restrictions) with suspected blunt multiple trauma directly transferred from the scene to the hospital and requiring resuscitation in the emergency department / trauma bay
Key exclusion criteriaDue to the retrospective nature of this analysis only patients with insufficient or lacking information in the hospital documentation system will be excluded from the analysis
Date of first enrolment15/07/2011
Date of final enrolment01/10/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Germany

Study participating centre

Emergency Hospital Berlin (Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin)
Berlin
12683
Germany

Sponsor information

Emergency Hospital Berlin (Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin) (Germany)
Hospital/treatment centre

Warener Str. 7
Berlin
12683
Germany

Phone +49 (0)30 5681 4090
Email zkf@ukb.de
Website http://www.ukb.de/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/011zjcv36

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Investigator initiated and funded (Germany)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 09/12/2011 Yes No

Editorial Notes

19/04/2017: Plain English summary added.