Can an enhanced balance training programme improve mobility & reduce falls in elderly patients presenting to Health Services

ISRCTN ISRCTN36275952
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36275952
Secondary identifying numbers REC00164
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
22/09/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Lalit Kalra
Scientific

Guy's, King's, St Thomas' School of Medicine
Department of Medicine
King's Denmark Hill Campus
Bessemer Road
London
SE5 9PJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7346 3487
Email lalit.kalra@kcl.ac.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Scientific title
Study objectivesA randomised control study will be undertaken in 200 patients over 60 years of age to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and acceptability of a well-defined generalisable, mainstream physiotherapy intervention in improving mobility and preventing falls. Outcome will be measured at 1, 3 and 6 months. In addition to validated measures for balance, falls and mobility, assessments will be include measures of functional ability, quality of life, patients' perception of walking abilities and satisfaction. Information will also be available on effective components of balance training (which can be replicated in other settings) and identification of patients most likely to benefit which will facilitate targeting to improve overall effectiveness. The emphasis of the project is to develop and evaluate interventions deliverable within mainstream practice and applicable to mainstream patients.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedInjury, occupational diseases, poisoning: Musculoskeletal injury
Intervention1. Intervention group will receive therapy specific to functional balance consisting of repetition and progressive grading of tasks to narrow the base of support and retraining dynamic balance.
2. Conventional treatment will consist of general transfer and mobility skills as currently prescribed.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTimed 3 metre walk; Self Perception Questionnaire (SPQ); Berg Balance Scale (incorporating the 180 degree turn); Balance Performance Monitor (BPM); Falls Efficacy Scale; Frenchay Activities Index; Euroqual; patient satisfaction.
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/05/1998
Completion date01/04/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participants200
Key inclusion criteria200 patients over 60 years of age who present with falls/deteriorating mobility to outpatient clinics, A & E departments and outpatients therapy services on 3 sites.
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not match inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/05/1998
Date of final enrolment01/04/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Guy's, King's, St Thomas' School of Medicine
London
SE5 9PJ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive London (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2003 Yes No