The clinical and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock

ISRCTN ISRCTN36307479
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36307479
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 07/37/47; ICNARC/01/01/09
Submission date
18/11/2009
Registration date
19/11/2009
Last edited
20/04/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Each year in the UK, about 31,000 people are admitted to critical care with severe sepsis, a syndrome where the body has an uncontrolled inflammatory response to infection which leads to damage to and subsequently failure of organs such as the lungs, heart and kidneys. Around one third of these patients die before discharge from hospital. Identifying these patients early and applying a strict protocol to control the amount of fluids, blood and drugs given may reduce the number of deaths and also the amount of time patients spend in hospital. However, we do not know whether this approach would be as successful if applied across all hospitals in the NHS. We aim to compare this protocol to the usual care delivered in NHS emergency departments and medical/surgical admissions units to establish the best approach to managing these patients.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or over with the early signs of severe sepsis

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated either to be treated according to the new protocol or to receive the usual care. We assess the number of deaths within 90 days and the costs of each approach to determine whether the protocols offer good value for money to the NHS.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
February 2011 to December 2013

Who is funding the study?
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof Kathryn Rowan
kathy.rowan@icnarc.org

Contact information

Prof Kathryn Rowan
Scientific

Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC)
Napier House
24 High Holborn
London
WC1V 6AZ
United Kingdom

Email kathy.rowan@icnarc.org

Study information

Study designProspective multicentre randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA multicentre, randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock
Study acronymProMISe
Study objectivesCurrent hypothesis as of 04/01/2013:
To evaluate a resuscitation protocol, with pre-determined haemodynamic goals, compared with usual resuscitation

Previous hypothesis until 04/01/2013:
To evaluate a resuscitation strategy with pre-determined haemodynamic endpoints compared to usual care for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/073747
Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/51800/PRO-07-37-47.pdf
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSevere sepsis/septic shock
InterventionIntervention arm: Early goal-directed protocolised resuscitation; targeting of specific haemodynamic goals including central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure and central venous oxygen saturation.
Control arm: Usual care

Patients admitted to Emergency Departments with severe sepsis or septic shock will undergo 6 hours of the intervention arm post-randomisation. For the control arm patients will be treated via usual care for these 6 hours. After this patients will be treated with standard care.

Patients will be followed up for a year post-admission to hospital. This will include assessments at 28 days, 90 days and 1 year. This trial is not classed as a CTIMP.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Mortality at 90 days
2. Incremental cost-effectiveness at one year
Secondary outcome measuresCurrent secondary outcome measures as of 04/01/2013:
1. To compare:
1.1. Mortality at one year
1.2. Health-related quality of life at 90 days and one year
1.3. Resource use and costs at 90 days and one year
1.4. Requirement for, and duration of, critical care unit organ support
1.5. Length of stay in the ED, critical care unit and acute hospital
2. To estimate:
2.1. Lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness

Previous secondary outcome measures until 04/01/2013:
1. Duration of survival
2. Mortality at 28 days
3. Mortality at discharge from critical care and discharge from hospital
4. Mortality at one year
5. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 6 hours and 72 hours (adjusted for baseline)
6. Requirement for, and duration of, monitoring and support of specific organ systems (CCMDS)
7. Duration of ED, critical care unit and hospital stay
8. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) at 90 days and one year
9. Resource use and costs at 90 days and one year
10. Lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness
Overall study start date15/02/2011
Completion date31/12/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1260
Key inclusion criteria1. Greater than or equal to 18 years of age, either sex
2. Known or presumed infection
3. Two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria:
3.1. Core temperature less than or equal to 36°C or greater than or equal to 38°C
3.2. Heart rate greater than or equal to 90 beats/min
3.3. Respiratory rate greater than or equal to 20 breaths/min (or hyperventilation indicated by partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood [PaCO2] 4.3 kPa or mechanical ventilation for an acute process)
3.4. White blood cell count less than or equal to 4 x 10^9 l or greater than or equal to 12 x 10^9 l (or the presence of greater than 10% immature neutrophils "bands")
4. Refractory hypotension or hypoperfusion:
4.1. Hypotension is confirmed by the presence of systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg despite an intravenous (IV) fluid challenge of at least 20 ml/kg within 30 minutes of Emergency Department (ED) arrival (including IV fluids administered by pre-hospital/Emergency Medical Services [EMS] personnel)
4.2. Hypoperfusion is confirmed by a blood lactate concentration greater than or equal to 4 mmol/L)
5. First dose of IV antimicrobial therapy commenced prior to randomisation
Key exclusion criteriaCurrent exclusion criteria as of 04/01/2013:
1. Age less than 18 years
2. Known pregnancy
3. Primary diagnosis of:
3.1. an acute cerebral vascular event
3.2. acute coronary syndrome
3.3. acute pulmonary oedema
3.4. status asthmaticus
3.5. major cardiac arrhythmia (as part of primary diagnosis)
3.6. seizure
3.7. drug overdose
3.8. injury from burn or trauma
4. Haemodynamic instability due to active gastrointestinal haemorrhage
5. Requirement for immediate surgery
6. Known history of AIDS
7. Do-Not-Attempt-Resuscitation (DNAR) status
8. Advanced directives restricting implementation of the resuscitation protocol
9. Contraindication to central venous catheterization
10. Contraindication to blood transfusion
11. Attending clinician deems aggressive resuscitation unsuitable
12. Transferred from another in-hospital setting
13. Not able to commence resuscitation protocol within one hour of randomisation or complete six hours of protocol treatment from commencement

Previous exclusion criteria until 04/01/2013:
1. Aged less than 18 years
2. Known pregnancy
3. Primary diagnosis of acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary oedema, status asthmaticus, major cardiac arrhythmia (as part of primary diagnosis), seizure, drug overdose, injury from burn or trauma
4. Haemodynamic instability due to active gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage
5. Immunosuppressive agents including chemotherapy for uncured cancer, immunosuppression for organ transplantation or from systematic disease
6. Requirement for immediate surgery
7. Do not resuscitate status
8. Advanced directives restricting implementation of the protocol
9. Contraindications to central venous catheterisation
10. Contradiction to blood transfusion (i.e. Jehovah's Witness)
11. Attending physician deems aggressive care unsuitable
12. Participation in another interventional study
13. Transferred from another in-hospital setting
14. Not able to start within 1 hour of randomisation or finish within 6 hours
Date of first enrolment15/02/2011
Date of final enrolment31/12/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC)
London
WC1V 6AZ
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) (UK)
Government

c/o Keryn Vella
Napier House
24 High Holborn
London
WC1V 6AZ
United Kingdom

Website https://www.icnarc.org/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/057b2ek35

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme - HTA (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Statistical Analysis Plan statistical analysis plan 01/12/2013 No No
Results article results 02/04/2015 Yes No
Results article results 01/11/2015 Yes No

Editorial Notes

20/04/2016: Plain English summary added.

On 04/01/2013 the following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall trial start date was changed from 01/06/2010 to 15/02/2011.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 31/07/2012 to 31/12/2013.