Randomised controlled trial of narrow band imaging (NBI) versus standard endoscopy for adenoma detection
ISRCTN | ISRCTN36386665 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN36386665 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N0515176146 |
- Submission date
- 29/09/2006
- Registration date
- 29/09/2006
- Last edited
- 02/10/2014
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Brian P Saunders
Scientific
Scientific
The Wolfson Unit 2nd Floor
North West London Hospitals NHS Trust
St Mark's Hospital
Watford Road
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)20 8235 4225 |
---|---|
b.saunders@imperial.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Diagnostic |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | |
Study objectives | Does a new colonoscopic viewing technique called narrow band imaging (NBI) help doctors detect more patients with at least one pre-cancerous polyp (adenoma) than conventional colonoscopy using white light alone? The study is to determine if narrow band imaging is better for detecting flat polyps than conventional diagnosis. A high detection rate of flat polyps would indicate that this type of surveillance should be used in the national cancer screening programme. |
Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Surgery: Colonoscopy |
Intervention | Narrow band imaging (NBI) versus standard endoscopy. |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Categorical data will be compared with chi-squared test, t-testing on Mann-Whitney U test will be used for continuous data depending on normality |
Secondary outcome measures | Not provided at time of registration |
Overall study start date | 20/01/2006 |
Completion date | 31/12/2007 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Not Specified |
Target number of participants | 107 patients will be needed for each group, 214 in total. Recruitment completed Summer 2008 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Patients over 18 assessed as fit for routine colonoscopy 2. Patients attending for screening or surveillance colonoscopy 3. At least three adenomas or one adenoma >10 mm at previous colonoscopy post colorectal cancer resection screening with positive faecal occult blood tests |
Key exclusion criteria | Pre-intubation: 1. Patients with known colitis or polyposis syndromes 2. Unable or unwilling to give consent Pre-caecum to randomisation: 1. Those with poor bowel preparation 2. Unable to reach caecum due to stricture |
Date of first enrolment | 20/01/2006 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2007 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
The Wolfson Unit 2nd Floor
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Government
Government
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)20 7307 2622 |
---|---|
dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk | |
Website | http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en |
Funders
Funder type
Government
North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/11/2012 | Yes | No |