Folate augmentation of treatment - evaluation for depression

ISRCTN ISRCTN37558856
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN37558856
EudraCT/CTIS number 2006-004647-37
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00514410
Secondary identifying numbers HTA 04/35/08
Submission date
29/08/2006
Registration date
30/08/2006
Last edited
13/09/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
One in five people experience depression during their lives. Only half of those treated with drugs will get better; many others experience symptoms for a long time. The most common type of treatment for depression is a drug known as an antidepressant. These work by improving the way in which certain chemical messengers work in the brain. The vitamin called folate, found in foods such as green vegetables, helps to produce the chemicals used by these messengers in the brain. So low levels of folate, caused by poor diet or similar factors, may worsen or even cause depression, and may stop antidepressants from working as well as they should. This means that taking folate tablets could help treat depression. However, very few studies have been done to test this. This study will test whether giving a tablet of folate every day to people with depression will help their antidepressants work better.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 or over with moderate to severe depression

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to take either a folate tablet or a dummy tablet for 3 months in addition to their antidepressant. To test whether folate tablets help antidepressants to work better, we assess whether those taking the tablets achieve better health. To do this we measure peoples' symptoms of depression at different times during the study. We also check their blood to see how much folate they have at different times during the study. We shall use some of the blood samples to see whether any genes affect the way folate helps treat depression.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
University of Wales Bangor (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2006 to June 2011

Who is funding the study?
Health Technology Assessment Programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Ian Russell
ian.russell@bangor.ac.uk

Contact information

Prof Ian Russell
Scientific

IMSCaR
Brigantia Building
Penrallt Road
Bangor
LL57 2AS
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1248 383617
Email ian.russell@bangor.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centred double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleFolate Augmentation of Treatment - Evaluation for Depression: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymFolATED
Study hypothesisThe primary objective of this trial is to estimate the effect of folate augmentation in new or continuing treatment of depressive disorder in primary, intermediate and secondary care. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of folate augmentation of antidepressant treatment, investigate how the response to antidepressant treatment depends on genetic polymorphisms relevant to folate metabolism and antidepressant response, and explore whether baseline folate status can predict response to antidepressant treatment.

More details can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/043508
Protocol can be found at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/51078/PRO-04-35-08.pdf
Ethics approval(s)MREC for Wales, 06/11/2006, CTA ref: 21996/0001/001-0001
ConditionModerate to severe depression
InterventionFolic acid 5 mg versus placebo supplementation to antidepressant therapy.
Intervention typeSupplement
Primary outcome measureSymptom severity as estimated by the self-rated Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Secondary outcome measures1. Clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
2. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of change
3. SF-12 short form health survey
4. Adverse events and side effects as measured by the UKU side effect scale
5. EuroQoL (EQ-5D)
6. Health Resource Use questionnaire
Overall study start date01/10/2006
Overall study end date30/06/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants730
Participant inclusion criteriaOnly patients aged 18 or over with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) diagnosis of moderate to severe depression (confirmed by the trial psychiatrists during the screening interview using Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) will be included. Only patients able to give informed consent (not delirious, actively psychotic or with severe communication or learning disability) and able to complete the research assessments will be included.
Participant exclusion criteria1. Patients that are folate deficient (provisionally set at less than 2.5 ng/l): they cannot be randomised because they need to be treated with folic acid but can be included in the comprehensive cohort
2. Are B12 deficient (provisionally set at less than 150 pg/ml): they cannot be randomised because they need to be treated with B12 injections but can be included in the comprehensive cohort
3. Have knowingly taken supplements containing folic acid within two months because this will mask any effects of folic acid given during the study
4. Substance misuse because people who use drug and alcohol typically have low folate levels
5. Suffer from psychosis because additional treatment for psychosis may mask any benefit of folic acid with antidepressants. Plus people suffering from psychosis are less able to give informed consent and will require referral through to secondary services
6. Are already participating in another research project
7. Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant as it is important for pregnant women to take folic acid so they cannot be randomised to placebo
8. Are taking anticonvulsants as in very rare circumstances folic acid can react with certain anticonvulsants
9. Serious, advanced or terminal illness with a life expectancy of less than one year
10. Have recently started treatment for a medical condition which has not yet been stabilised
Recruitment start date01/10/2006
Recruitment end date30/06/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • Wales

Study participating centre

IMSCaR
Bangor
LL57 2AS
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Wales Bangor (UK)
University/education

Brigantia Building
Penrallt Road
Bangor
LL57 2AS
Wales
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1248 383617
Email ian.russell@bangor.ac.uk
Website http://www.bangor.ac.uk/index.php.en?width=1024&height=768
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/006jb1a24

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 15/11/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/07/2014 Yes No
Results article Methylmalonic acid levels 11/09/2021 13/09/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

13/09/2021: Publication reference added.
07/06/2016: Plain English summary added.
26/08/2009: the overall trial end date of this trial was changed from 30/06/2009 to 30/06/2011.