Efficacy of a group program to support unemployed individuals with mental health problems
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN38560825 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38560825 |
- Submission date
- 21/04/2017
- Registration date
- 09/05/2017
- Last edited
- 24/05/2019
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims:
People with mental illness often choose not to use mental health services and to limit their job search activities. This leads to productivity losses and poor clinical outcomes. There are few tested interventions to increase mental health service use and job search activities for unemployed people with mental health problems. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a group program to increase help-seeking and job search activities among unemployed people with mental health problems.
Who can participate?
Adults aged 18-64 who are unemployed and have mental health problems
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to either take part in the group program or not. Both groups also continue their current mental health service use, if they have any. The group program consists of four sessions of two hours and runs for six weeks. Sessions take place in week 1, 2, 3 and 6. There are about 6 to 10 participants in each group (overall about 100 participants). Using a set of questionnaires, acceptance, sense and purpose of life, disclosure-related distress and help-seeking as well as other outcomes are assessed at three times: at the start of the study, and then again 3 and 6 weeks and 6 months later.
What are possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants have two possible benefits. First, participants in the treatment group are likely to benefit from the discussions with other participants and with the group facilitators. Second, all participants in both groups fill in questionnaires. Some may find the questionnaires stimulating and helpful, because they raise issues relevant to their current situation with unemployment and mental health. However, some people may find it distressing to think about the questioned issues. Therefore all participants can interrupt or end their participation altogether at any time or find support from group members and facilitators or contact the research team or the department of Psychiatry II at Ulm University, at any time.
Where is the study run from?
Ulm University & BHK Günzburg (Germany)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2017 to April 2018
Who is funding the study?
German Research Foundation (DFG)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Nicolas Rüsch
Contact information
Prof Nicolas Rüsch
Scientific
Scientific
Parkstraße 11
Ulm
89073
Germany
Study information
| Study design | Randomized controlled trial |
|---|---|
| Primary study design | Interventional |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study setting(s) | Other |
| Study type | Treatment |
| Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
| Scientific title | Efficacy of a group program to support unemployed individuals with mental health problems: a pilot randomised controlled trial |
| Study acronym | AloHA |
| Study objectives | 1. Participants in the group program report decreased self-stigma, shame, social withdrawal, and secrecy compared to the control group (TAU) after 3 and 6 weeks 2. Participants in the group program report increased self-esteem, empowerment and job search and help-seeking activities for mental health issues, compared to the control group (TAU) after 3 and 6 weeks |
| Ethics approval(s) | The ethics committee of Ulm University, 08/02/2017, ref. 14/17 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Unemployed people with mental health problems |
| Intervention | Randomization method Computer-generated random numbers, printed out on paper with one number per page, will be put in closed envelopes, one number/page per envelope. Envelopes will be numbered outside, starting with 1. Randomization will take place following the baseline assessment. Each participant who has completed the baseline assessment will receive the next envelope. Participants with even numbers are assigned to the intervention group, participants with uneven numbers to the control group. Participants are randomized to one of two groups: Control group Control group participants can continue any (mental) health care they may be receiving before the study. No intervention is delivered as part of the study to control group participants. If they wish, they can receive a copy of the program workbook after completing their last assessment. Intervention group The group program is about acceptance, help-seeking decisions and support for mental health problems and job search and disclosure. The groups are facilitated by one peer (person with a history of unemployment and mental illness) and one psychotherapist. Each group runs for six weeks and consists of 4 sessions, one session in week 1, 2 and 3 and a booster-session in week 6. Each sessions last about two hours. 1. Acceptance: In this lesson, participants get an overview about the program and the mindfulness concept. Integral part of all sessions are mindfulness exercises. Acceptance (regarding unemployment and mental health problems) and the motivation of help-seeking is the second part. 2. Own values: In this session participants get an overview about different values. In a second step participants think about their own values and their implications for behavior and actions. As homework, participants will be encouraged to test a person in their personal surrounding, if he/she is eligible for disclosure. 3. Information about help services: Intensifying and repeating the topic of values and their implications for participants behavior. Information on help-seeking and availability of help-services for unemployment and mental health problems. As homework, participants are asked to write down, how they would tell their own story to someone else. 4. Committed action and authenticity: In this session participants learn how to accept thoughts and feelings about their current situation. Participants discuss disclosure of mental health problems to future employers. This session also contains a wrap up of the intervention. Note that all lessons contain exercises about mindfulness and disclosure and all sessions are accompanied by stories and worksheets in the workbook. Using a set of questionnaires, acceptance, sense and purpose of life, disclosure-related distress and help-seeking as well as other outcomes are assessed at three times: at baseline, and then again 3 and 6 weeks later. |
| Intervention type | Behavioural |
| Primary outcome measure | Current primary outcome measures as of 21/06/2017: 1. Job search self-efficacy, measured with the Job Search Self-Efficacy questionnaire, 6 Items (van Ryn & Vinokur, 1992) 2. Help-seeking intentions and behaviors, measured with the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ), 10 Items (Wilson et al., 2005) Measured at baseline (t0), 3 weeks after baseline (t1), 6 weeks after baseline (t2) and 6 months after baseline (t3). Previous primary outcome measures: Positive: 1. Psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance, measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), 7 Items (Bond, et al., 2011) 2. Help-seeking intentions and behaviors, measured with the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ), 10 Items (Wilson et al., 2005) 3. Recovery, measured with the Self-Identified Stage of Recovery Scale, 5 Items (Andresen et al., 2010) 4. Job search behaviors and intentions, measured with the Job search behavior and intention questionnaire, 12 Items (Blau, 1994) 5. Job search self-efficacy, measured with the Job Search Self-Efficacy questionnaire, 6 Items (van Ryn & Vinokur, 1992) 6. Job search effort/outcome measured with two previously used items (Rüsch et al, unpublished) 7. Perceived helpfulness of mental health care, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al, unpublished) 8. Locus of control, measured with two Items (Lindström, 2011) 9. Perceived need of treatment and presence/outcome of illness, measured with the SAIQ – Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire, 10 Items (Marks et al., 2000) 10. Quality of life, measured with the EUROHIS-QOL, 8 Items (Brähler et al., 2007) 11. Self-esteem, measured with the single item self-esteem measure (SISE; Robins et al., 2001) 12. Empowerment, measured with the self-esteem/self-efficacy subscale of the Empowerment Scale (ES), 9 Items (Roger et al, 1997) Negative/other: 1. Attitudes to disclosure measured with two previously used items (Rüsch et al., 2011) 2. Social withdrawal and secrecy, measured with the Stigma Coping Orientation Scales, 12 items (Link et al., 1991) 3. Self-stigma associated with help-seeking, measured with Self-Stigma of Seeking Help Scale, 10 Items (Vogel et al., 2006) 4. The cognitive appraisal of stigma as a stressor, measured with the Stigma-Stress-Scale, 8 Items (Rüsch et al., 2009) 5. Shame, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al., 2014) – ('Would you feel ashamed about having a mental illness?'; from 1, not at all, to 7, very much) 6. Hopelessness, measured with Beck’s Hopelessness Scale – Brief version, 4 Items (Yip & Cheung, 2006) 7. Self-labelling as “mentally ill”, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al., 2014) 8. Depressive symptoms, measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), German version with 15 Items (Hautzinger & Bailer (1993) 9. Internalized stigma, measured with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI), brief version with 10 Items (Boyd et al, 2014) 10. Self-stigma, measured with the Self-Stigma in Mental Illness Scale – Short Form (SSMIS), subscale apply/self-concurrence, 5 Items (Corrigan et al, 2012) 11. Self-reported mental distress, measured with Kessler’s K6 Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler, 2003). Measured at baseline (t0), 3 weeks after baseline (t1) and 6 weeks after baseline (t2) |
| Secondary outcome measures | Moved from primary outcome measures on 21/06/2017: Positive: 1. Psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance, measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), 7 Items (Bond, et al., 2011) 2. Help-seeking Intentions and Behaviors, measured with the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHSQ), 10 Items (Wilson et al., 2005) 3. Recovery, measured with the Self-Identified Stage of Recovery Scale, 5 Items (Andresen et al., 2010) 4. Job search behaviors and intentions, measured with the Job search behavior and intention questionnaire, 12 Items (Blau, 1994) 5. Job search effort/outcome measured with two previously used items (Rüsch et al, unpublished) 6. Perceived helpfulness of mental health care, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al, unpublished) 7. Locus of control, measured with two Items (Lindström, 2011) 8. Perceived need of treatment and presence/outcome of illness, measured with the SAIQ – Self-Appraisal of Illness Questionnaire, 10 Items (Marks et al., 2000) 9. Quality of life, measured with the EUROHIS-QOL, 8 Items (Brähler et al., 2007) 10. Self-esteem, measured with the single item self-esteem measure (SISE; Robins et al., 2001) 11. Empowerment, measured with the self-esteem/self-efficacy subscale of the Empowerment Scale (ES), 9 Items (Roger et al, 1997) Negative/other: 1. Attitudes to disclosure measured with two previously used items (Rüsch et al., 2011) 2. Social withdrawal and secrecy, measured with the Stigma Coping Orientation Scales, 12 items (Link et al., 1991) 3. Self-stigma associated with help-seeking, measured with Self-Stigma of Seeking Help Scale, 10 Items (Vogel et al., 2006) 4. The cognitive appraisal of stigma as a stressor, measured with the Stigma-Stress-Scale, 8 Items (Rüsch et al., 2009) 5. Shame, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al., 2014) – ('Would you feel ashamed about having a mental illness?'; from 1, not at all, to 7, very much) 6. Hopelessness, measured with Beck’s Hopelessness Scale – Brief version, 4 Items (Yip & Cheung, 2006) 7. Self-labelling as “mentally ill”, measured with one previously used item (Rüsch et al., 2014) 8. Depressive symptoms, measured with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D), German version with 15 Items (Hautzinger & Bailer (1993) 9. Internalized stigma, measured with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Inventory (ISMI), brief version with 10 Items (Boyd et al, 2014) 10. Self-stigma, measured with the Self-Stigma in Mental Illness Scale – Short Form (SSMIS), subscale apply/self-concurrence, 5 Items (Corrigan et al, 2012) 11. Self-reported mental distress, measured with Kessler’s K6 Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler, 2003) Measured at baseline (t0), 3 weeks after baseline (t1), 6 weeks after baseline (t2) and 6 months after baseline (t3). |
| Overall study start date | 01/01/2017 |
| Completion date | 01/04/2018 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Mixed |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | Both |
| Target number of participants | 100 (50 per group) |
| Total final enrolment | 42 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Currently unemployed (working less than 14h/week and receiving less than 451 Euro/months) 2. Psychological distress as indicated by a score ≥13 on Kessler’s Psychological Distress Scale (K6) 3. At least moderate level of self-reported stress due to current situation (score 3 or higher in screening item “How mentally distressed do you feel with respect to your current situation?”, rated from 1, not at all, to 5, very much) 4. 18 and 64 years of age 5. Ability to provide written informed consent 6. Fluent in German |
| Key exclusion criteria | Receiving full disability pension |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/05/2017 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/04/2018 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Germany
Study participating centre
University of Ulm and BKH Günzburg
Ulm
89069
Germany
89069
Germany
Sponsor information
German Research Foundation (DFG)
Research organisation
Research organisation
Kennedyallee 40
Bonn
53175
Germany
| Phone | +49 (0)228885-1 |
|---|---|
| postmaster@dfg.de | |
| Website | http://www.dfg.de |
"ROR" |
https://ror.org/018mejw64 |
Funders
Funder type
Research organisation
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Government organisation / National government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- German Research Association, German Research Foundation, DFG
- Location
- Germany
Results and Publications
| Intention to publish date | 01/12/2018 |
|---|---|
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
| Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a peer reviewed journal |
| IPD sharing plan | The data generated during the current study is not expected to be made available due to the ethics approval that does not permit third party access to the data. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/06/2019 | 24/05/2019 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
24/05/2019: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
09/08/2018: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/04/2019 to 01/12/2018.
