Return of function and external rotation post proximal humerus fracture fixation with neutral rotation brace
ISRCTN | ISRCTN38563880 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38563880 |
ClinicalTrials.gov number | NCT02073695 |
Secondary identifying numbers | 13/01/049 |
- Submission date
- 15/04/2014
- Registration date
- 13/05/2014
- Last edited
- 08/03/2018
- Recruitment status
- Stopped
- Overall study status
- Stopped
- Condition category
- Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Patients who have undergone surgery for shoulder fractures have a reduced range of movement. We believe that this could be due to the traditional shoulder slings used after the operation. We believe that holding the shoulder in this position causes it to scar up and makes it difficult for the shoulder to externally rotate which reduces function. Using a neutral rotation brace will help improve patients external shoulder rotation and improve functional outcome. We would like to perform a study to compare the functional outcome with the two different slings.
Who can participate?
Patients over 18 who have shoulder fractures requiring surgery.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to either having a traditional shoulder sling or a neutral rotation brace following the operation. They have to attend physiotherapy appointments at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after the operation. They will also complete some questionnaires. X-rays are taken (which is currently standard practice) at 6 weeks and 3 months to find out whether there is a fracture union (healing of the fracture) present. If there isnt a fracture union (similarly with current standard practice) patients will be followed up with x-rays until union is achieved.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The operation and post-operative treatment are standardised and no different from current practices. No increase in the number of side effects or complications is expected. Participants will help in changing current practice and improve patient functional outcome.
Where is the study run from?
Torbay District General Hospital, South Devon Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (UK).
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study opened in January 2013 and is expected to continue until December 2015.
Who is funding the study?
Torbay Medical Research Fund (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Ms Veronica Conboy
veronica.conboy@nhs.net
Contact information
Scientific
Consultant in Trauma and Orthopaedics
Torbay District General Hospital
Lawes Bridge
Torquay
TQ2 7AA
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1803 656635 |
---|---|
veronica.conboy@nhs.net |
Study information
Study design | Single-centre randomised interventional trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please contact sdhct.research@nhs.net or phone: 01803 656635 to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Return Of funcTion And exTErnal rotation post proximal humerus fracture fixation with neutral rotation brace: a randomised controlled trial |
Study acronym | ROTATE |
Study objectives | Using a neutral rotation brace will help improve patients external shoulder rotation and improve functional outcome. |
Ethics approval(s) | NRES Committee South West - Central Bristol, 22/01/2013, ref: 12/SW/0334 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Trauma and orthopaedics - proximal humeral fracture |
Intervention | Surgical procedure to fix proximal humeral fracture, as per standard clinical practice, same across two groups. Patients are then randomised to either having the standard polysling (as per current standard practice) or a neutral rotation brace. Questionnaires and assessments will be taken at the 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year follow up appointments. |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Functional outcome scores will be measured post surgery (Oxford, scores). This is a commonly used, validated outcome score used for assessment of patient outcomes. 1. Oxford Score this is a patients subjective assessment of pain and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) impairment. The Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire has been shown to correlate well with both the Constant Score and the SF36 assessment and to be sensitive to surgical intervention. The Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire accumulates to a total score with a maximum value of 60, in which four pain related questions make up 33% of this total whilst the remaining 67% is derived from eight ADL related questions. The highest scores are attributed to the worst outcomes in the Oxford Shoulder Questionnaire. 2. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring system was developed to assess the level of disability for any patient with any condition affecting the upper limb by covering domains including symptoms, physical function, social function and psychological function |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Range of movement (flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation) this will be assessed by physiotherapists at 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. Measurement will be performed using a goniometer to accurately assess range of movement 2. SF12 score this is a survey form has been shown to yield summary physical and mental health outcome scores 3. Range of movement (flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation) this will be assessed by physiotherapists at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Measurement will be performed using a goniometer to accurately assess range of movement 4. Time to union of fracture X-rays will be at taken at 6 weeks and 3 months 5. Return to work post surgery this will be documented at the 1 year follow up appointment 6. Reoperations and complications this will be documented by the clinician at the various outpatient appointments. |
Overall study start date | 24/01/2013 |
Completion date | 31/12/2015 |
Reason abandoned (if study stopped) | Participant recruitment issue |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 100 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Proximal humeral fractures requiring operative intervention with extramedullary plate fixation (i.e. fractures displaced by 1cm and/or angulated by 45 degrees or more) 2. Age over 18 years of age 3. Patients able to give informed consent |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients having intraoperative findings of complete Pectoralis major rupture or if operative exposure requires complete Pectoralis major tenotomy. (These patients need to be held in internal rotation with a standard polysling to allow healing of the Pectoralis major tendon) 2. Patients under 18 years of age 3. Patients unable to give informed consent |
Date of first enrolment | 24/01/2013 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2015 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centre
TQ2 7AA
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
R&D Manager
Research and Development Department
Horizon Centre
Torbay District General Hospital
Lawes Bridge
Torquay
TQ2 7AA
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)1803 656635 |
---|---|
sdhct.research@nhs.net | |
Website | http://www.sdhct.nhs.uk/ |
https://ror.org/05374b979 |
Funders
Funder type
Charity
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol article | Protocol | 21/02/2018 | Yes | No | |
HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Editorial Notes
08/03/2018: Protocol publication reference added.
26/01/2018: The trial stopped due to recruitment difficulties.