Effects of transfusing fresh versus standard-issue red cells on in-hospital mortality
ISRCTN | ISRCTN38768001 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38768001 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 04/08/2010
- Registration date
- 11/01/2011
- Last edited
- 24/08/2012
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Prof Nancy Heddle
Scientific
Scientific
McMaster Transfusion Research Program
HSC-3H50
1200 Main St West
Hamilton
L8N 3Z5
Canada
Phone | +1 905 52591040 ext 22126 |
---|---|
heddlen@mcmaster.ca |
Study information
Study design | Single centre pilot pragmatic double blind randomised controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Other |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet. |
Scientific title | Effects of transfusing fresh versus standard-issue red cells on in-hospital mortality: a pilot randomised controlled trial using a pragmatic approach |
Study acronym | INFORM |
Study objectives | Hundreds of thousands of Canadians receive a red cell transfusion each year. Current methods of blood inventory management are to issue the oldest blood first to limit outdating. However, data from experimental and observational studies suggest that red cells stored for longer periods might lead to adverse outcomes, including an increase in mortality. The only way to answer this question is to undertake a randomised controlled trial (RCT). If such a trial showed a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in mortality with freshest available versus standard issue red cells, it is likely to lead to major changes in the management of red cell inventories and storage methods to increase the use of fresher red cells. Such a large pragmatic trial is complex; hence before initiating a large trial it is important to work out logistics and show feasibility. Our proposed pilot study will provide crucial information for the design of a large RCT that will yield reliable and precise estimates of the effect of freshest available versus standard-issue red cells on in-hospital mortality. Further reading: Duration of red cell storage before transfusion and in-hospital mortality. Eikelboom JW, Cook RJ, Liu Y, Heddle NM. Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):737-743.e1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20435180 |
Ethics approval(s) | The Research Ethics Board at Hamilton Health Sciences approved on the 20th April 2010 (ref: 10-196) |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Red cell blood transfusion |
Intervention | Patients requiring red cell transfusion will be randomised to one of the following conditions: 1. Experimental transfusion is freshest available red cells 2. Control is standard issue red cells (oldest product in stock) |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Feasibility of randomising consecutive patients requiring blood transfusion: we anticipate that early in the study the failure rate may be higher due to the learning curve associated with the randomisation process; hence, the feasibility failure rate will be assessed on the data from the final 3 months of the 6 months pilot. This outcome will be monitored weekly with changes being implemented to prevent failures from occurring if possible. This is vital information in determining the feasibility of the larger RCT. |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Impact on inventory and red cell outdating rate 2. Contrast in the age of fresh and standard-issue red cells 3. Ability to provide timely reports to monitor inventory levels 4. Outdating and age overlap The frequency of in-hospital mortality will also be documented but used only to estimate the sample size for expanding the study if feasibility is demonstrated. |
Overall study start date | 01/01/2010 |
Completion date | 01/12/2010 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Other |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 1320 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Patients who are admitted to Hamilton General Hospital 2. Destined to receive a red cell transfusion 3. Either sex, no age restrictions The REB has approved that this study to be done with waived consent as it meets the 5 requirements for waived consent identified by the Tri Council Policy. However, to meet all requirements of this policy, patients will be informed that this study is taking place and will be given a summary of the study. |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients who have a particular requirement for fresh red cells (e.g., sickle cell disease, transfusion dependent thalassemia, fresh cells requested by physician) 2. Are to receive pre-planned directed or autologous donations 3. Massive transfusion anticipated 4. Being transfused as an outpatient |
Date of first enrolment | 01/01/2010 |
Date of final enrolment | 01/12/2010 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Canada
Study participating centre
McMaster Transfusion Research Program
Hamilton
L8N 3Z5
Canada
L8N 3Z5
Canada
Sponsor information
McMaster University (Canada)
University/education
University/education
1200 Main Street West
Hamilton, Ontario
L8N 3Z5
Canada
Website | http://www.mcmaster.ca/ |
---|---|
https://ror.org/02fa3aq29 |
Funders
Funder type
Research organisation
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Canada) - http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca (ref: 221072)
No information available
Canadian Blood Services (Canada)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
- Alternative name(s)
- Société canadienne du sang, CBS
- Location
- Canada
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/06/2012 | Yes | No |