A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by PAediatric Ward nurseS in children

ISRCTN ISRCTN38888037
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN38888037
Secondary identifying numbers Sponsor ref: 5339
Submission date
07/11/2007
Registration date
03/04/2008
Last edited
28/03/2012
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Jennie Rechner
Scientific

Kadoorie Centre, Level 3
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designAn interventional un-blinded, randomised single centre study.
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific title
Study acronymPAWS 2
Study objectivesDoes the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have a superior efficacy to achieve manual ventilation compared with the current recommended technique (the oro-pharyngeal airway and face mask) for children who are not breathing when used by paediatric ward nurses?

Please note that this trial is a follow-on from the previously registered trial ISRCTN38042170 - A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the oropharyngeal airway and facemask to achieve manual ventilation in children as performed by critical care and anaesthetic nurses (see http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN38042170), which investigates the LMA used by critical care and anaesthetic nurses.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee A on the 10th Septermber 2007 (ref: 07/H0604/76).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedManual ventilation
InterventionThe child would be anaesthetised in a standard way by a consultant anaesthetist. Once asleep the paediatric ward nurse would insert each airway device in random order and manually ventilate the lungs for a minimum of five breaths. Ventilation would be measured by an ultrasonic displacement device sited over the chest and compared to that achieved by the consultant paediatric anaesthetist. There is no follow up after the intervention.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureChest expansion (as a percentage of that achieved by the consultant paediatric anaesthetist, averaged over five breaths), measured at the time of the intervention.
Secondary outcome measures1. To assess the effectiveness of ventilation by paediatric ward nurses when using the facemask and oropharyngeal airway
2. To assess whether the paediatric ward nurses can be trained to successfully place the laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetised children after mannikin training
3. To assess whether a learning curve exists for successful insertion of the laryngeal mask airway
4. To compare the time taken to successful ventilation using both airway devices

All outcomes will be measured at the time of the intervention.
Overall study start date24/09/2007
Completion date24/12/2008

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
Lower age limit6 Months
Upper age limit8 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants35 nurses, 105 children
Key inclusion criteria1. All children aged 6 months to 8 years, scheduled for elective surgery or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in which a laryngeal mask airway would be placed routinely
2. Paediatric ward nurses
Key exclusion criteria1. Children in whom a laryngeal mask airway is contradicted, e.g., gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, known difficult airway or obesity
2. Children outside the inclusion age range
Date of first enrolment24/09/2007
Date of final enrolment24/12/2008

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Kadoorie Centre, Level 3
Oxford
OX3 9DU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Manor House
John Radcliffe Hospital
Headley Way
Oxford
OX39DU
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 222143
Email valerie.berry@orh.nhs.uk
Website http://www.oxfordradcliffe.nhs.uk/home.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03h2bh287

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Resuscitation Council (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/08/2007 Yes No