Cognitive training as a facilitated self-help intervention for depression: a Medical Research Council (MRC) experimental medicine trial

ISRCTN ISRCTN39455344
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN39455344
Secondary identifying numbers 4580
Submission date
31/03/2010
Registration date
31/03/2010
Last edited
19/07/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Ed Watkins
Scientific

Mood Disorders Centre
School of Psychology
Washington Singer Laboratories
Perry Road
Exeter
EX4 4QG
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised interventional single centre treatment trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleCognitive training as a facilitated self-help intervention for depression: a randomised interventional single centre treatment trial
Study objectives1. Can concreteness cognitive training facilitated self-help produce robust and stable shifts in thinking style in dysphoric and moderately depressed individuals, relative to a no training control condition (treatment-as-usual) and relative to an active intervention controlling for non-specific factors (relaxation)?
2. Can cognitive training facilitated self-help in addition to treatment-as-usual significantly reduce rumination and depression in depressed patients relative to treatment-as-usual and relative to an active intervention controlling for non-specific factors (relaxation) in a primary care setting?
3. Does the shift in thinking style causally mediate the effects of cognitive training on rumination and depression? To investigate mediation using Baron and Kenny's criteria, we will investigate a series of supplementary research questions:
3.1. Does treatment condition have a significant effect on outcome?
3.2. Does treatment condition influence changes in the given cognitive process from before to after therapy?
3.3. Does change in the given cognitive process predict outcome?
3.4. Does change in the given cognitive process remain a significant predictor of outcome when controlling for treatment condition
3.5. Is the effect of treatment condition on outcome attenuated when controlling for change in the given cognitive process? A given cognitive process could be said to function as a mediator of facilitated self-help on outcome if all the above questions are answered "yes".
4. Is cognitive training feasible and acceptable as a potential self-help intervention?
5. What patient factors might predict response to the psychological intervention?
Ethics approval(s)Devon and Torbay REC approved in September 2006 (ref: 06/Q2102/66)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Mental Health Research Network, Primary Care Research Network for England; Subtopic: Depression, Not Assigned; Disease: Depression, All Diseases
Intervention1. Cognitive training self-help in addition to treatment-as-usual
2. Relaxation training self-help in addition to treatment-as-usual
3. Treatment-as-usual

The cognitive training facilitated self-help intervention will consist of an initial meeting lasting approximately 1.5 hours (subject to modification as the project progresses), during which the researcher will explain the rationale for why cognitive training is helpful and then practice relaxation or the cognitive training paradigm.

Follow Up Length: 6 month(s)
Study Entry: Single Randomisation only
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureHamilton Rating Scale for Depression - 17 item version (HRS-D). Timepoints were assessed at baseline pre-treatment, 2 months post-baseline assessment (post-treatment), after 3 months follow-up (i.e., after 5 months post-baseline) and after 6 months follow-up (i.e., 8 months post baseline assessment).
Secondary outcome measuresDepressive symptoms: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). Timepoints were assessed at baseline pre-treatment, 2 months post-baseline assessment (post-treatment), after 3 months follow-up (i.e., after 5 months post-baseline) and after 6 months follow-up (i.e., 8 months post baseline assessment).
Overall study start date01/03/2008
Completion date31/08/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 120; UK Sample Size: 120
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 years or older, either sex
2. Currently depressed patients, whether they are currently taking antidepressant medication or not
Key exclusion criteria1. Current co-morbid diagnosis or history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders
2. Current and clinically significant drug or alcohol dependence
3. Persistent anti-social behaviour
4. Persistent self-injury requiring clinical management/therapy
5. Learning disability (intelligence quotient [IQ] less than 70)
6. Organic brain damage
7. Current formal face-to-face psychotherapy/counselling (does not include computer-based cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT], psychoeducation, or bibliotherapy)
8. Unable to engage with facilitated self-help treatment for physical, practical or other reasons (e.g. unable to comprehend materials)
Date of first enrolment01/03/2008
Date of final enrolment31/08/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Mood Disorders Centre
Exeter
EX4 4QG
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Exeter (UK)
University/education

The Queen s Drive
Exeter
EX4 4QJ
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.exeter.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03yghzc09

Funders

Funder type

Research council

Medical Research Council (MRC) (UK) (ref: 72156)
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), UK Medical Research Council, MRC
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/07/2012 Yes No