Evaluation of a computer system that alerts heathcare professionals to changes in foetal monitoring signals acquired during labour

ISRCTN ISRCTN42314164
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42314164
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
02/12/2008
Registration date
26/01/2009
Last edited
08/12/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Diogo Ayres-de-Campos
Scientific

Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Faculdade de Medicina do Porto
Porto
4200-319
Portugal

Phone +351 96 670 7112
Email sisporto@med.up.pt

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled open multi-centre trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typePrevention
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised clinical trial of intrapartum foetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring
Study acronymEFM-ALERT
Study objectivesUse of a system for computer analysis of intrapartum foetal monitoring signals, with real-time alerts for healthcare professionals, will reduce the number of foetuses born with metabolic acidosis, when compared with conventional monitoring.
Ethics approval(s)To be submitted as of 02/12/2008.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIntrapartum foetal hypoxia
InterventionContinuous foetal monitoring during labour with computer analysis by the Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 system vs continuous intrapartum monitoring as previously performed.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureIncidence of foetal metabolic acidosis, defined as newborn umbilical artery pH <7.05 and BDecf >12 mmol/L.
Secondary outcome measures1. Overall rates of caesarean section and caesarean section for non-reassuring foetal state
2. Overall rates of instrumental vaginal delivery and instrumental vaginal delivery for non-reassuring foetal state
3. Foetal blood sampling rates
4. Incidence of 5-minute Apgar score <7
5. Need for neonatal intensive care unit admission
6. Incidence of moderate and severe neonatal encephalopathy with a hypoxic marker
7. Perinatal death
8. Rate of delayed interventions (interval between red alerts [intervention arm]/offline analysis [control arm] and delivery in metabolic acidosis cases)
8. Tracing quality and signal loss
Overall study start date01/04/2009
Completion date01/04/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexFemale
Target number of participants8,000
Key inclusion criteria1. Pregnant women, aged more than 16 years
2. Able to provide written informed consent
3. Singleton pregnancy
4. Gestation of 36 or more completed weeks
5. Cephalic presentation
6. No known major foetal malformations
7. In active labour but not in active second stage
8. No known contraindication to vaginal delivery
9. Clinical decision made to perform continuous cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not meet inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/04/2009
Date of final enrolment01/04/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Portugal
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Porto
4200-319
Portugal

Sponsor information

University of Porto (Universidade do Porto) (Portugal)
University/education

Faculdade de Medicina do Porto
Alameda Hernani Monteiro
Porto
4200-319
Portugal

Website http://sigarra.up.pt/fmup
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/043pwc612

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Institute of Biomedical Engineering (Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica) (INEB) (Portugal)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 28/10/2010 Yes No
Results article results 01/01/2017 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/12/2016: Publication reference added.