A randomised controlled trial of cognitive therapy for command hallucinations

ISRCTN ISRCTN42620357
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42620357
Secondary identifying numbers RGC00391
Submission date
23/01/2004
Registration date
23/01/2004
Last edited
29/01/2010
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Peter Trower
Scientific

University of Birmingham / South Bham Mental Health Trust
Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital
Mindelsohn Way
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesThe objective is to evaluate whether a form of cognitive therapy (CT) developed by the applicants is an effective form of treatment for command hallucinations. The researcher's cognitive model asserts that high risk behaviours of command hallucinators are a consequence of core beliefs, namely a conviction in the power of their voices and a belief that they are compelled to comply with and appease these voices.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedSchizophrenia and other psychoses
Intervention1. Cognitive therapy
2. Control
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Voices:
1.1. Content - Cognitive Assessment Schedule (Chadwick & Birchwood, 1995)
1.2. Topograph - Frequency, volume, audibility, affect (Hustig & Hafner, 1992)
1.3. Beliefs and evidence
1.3.1. Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (Chadwick & Birchwood, 1995)
1.3.2. Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Schedule (Buchanan et al 1993)
1.4. Compliance (Beck-Sander et al 1997)
2. Affect:
2.1. Depression, hopelessness (Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia: Addington & Addington, 1993)
3. Mental State:
3.1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (Kay, 1997)
3.2. Previous episodes of 'risk' behaviours
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/10/1999
Completion date01/10/2001

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants52
Key inclusion criteriaThe sample will be drawn from the case registers of patients receiving treatment from South and North Birmingham Mental Health Trusts. From this sample base the researchers will draw a cohort of patients conforming to International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth revision (ICD-10) schizophrenia who have experienced auditory command hallucinations for a minimum of six months. There will 26 patients in each of the groups.
Key exclusion criteria1. Current drug and alcohol misuses
2. Primary organic disorder
This is to ensure that the auditory hallucinations are a symptom of schizophrenia rather than induced by drugs or the result of organic impairment.
Date of first enrolment01/10/1999
Date of final enrolment01/10/2001

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

University of Birmingham / South Bham Mental Health Trust
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

NHS R&D Regional Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Government

The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.doh.gov.uk

Funders

Funder type

Government

NHS Executive West Midlands (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/04/2004 Yes No