Reduction of early mortality in HIV-infected African adults and children starting antiretroviral therapy
ISRCTN | ISRCTN43622374 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN43622374 |
ClinicalTrials.gov number | NCT01825031 |
Secondary identifying numbers | G1100693 |
- Submission date
- 28/09/2011
- Registration date
- 18/10/2011
- Last edited
- 01/07/2024
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Infections and Infestations
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
At the moment, there is no cure for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, but there are medicines called anti-retrovirals (ARVs) that can control HIV and keep people well for a long time. Unfortunately in many African countries patients only come for treatment when they are very sick and HIV has already had a big effect on their bodies. Often patients have malnutrition, diarrhoea, infections such as tuberculosis, serious lung infections (pneumonia) and other severe infections. This means that many more people die during the first 3 months after starting ARVs compared to richer countries. The aim of this study is to find out whether or not giving extra treatments during the first 3 months of taking ARVs will help sick people with HIV and prevent some of them from dying early, or whether giving extra treatments doesn’t make any difference and makes it harder to take ARVs. The extra treatments are:
1. An extra ARV drug added to the three standard ARVs (i.e., four ARVs in total)
2. A single pill containing cotrimoxazole (septrin) and isoniazid (to fight TB), plus fluconazole (to fight thrush) and azithromycin (to fight bacterial infections) and albendazole (to kill worms). All of these are medicines which fight against common infections in sick people with HIV
3. Extra food supplements to provide high energy food
Who can participate?
People aged 5 years and older who are HIV positive and also have low immunity measured by a blood test called the CD4 count, and therefore have a higher risk of getting sick.
What does the study involve?
Participants receive three ARVs and cotrimoxazole, together with any other medicines they are already taking or need for treatment of any infections. In addition, they are randomly allocated to receive or not receive each of the three extra treatments (ARVs, medicines to fight other infections, and nutritional supplements) for the first 3 months. After the first 3 months they continue to take three standard ARVs to fight HIV, cotrimoxazole (septrin) to help to protect against infections long-term, and isoniazid to protect against TB. Participants have regular clinic visits to see a nurse and a doctor and blood samples are taken to check for any side effects of the medicines. They are followed carefully for any side effects and responses to the treatments. Some of the blood is used to work out how much of the ARVs are actually getting into their blood where they can fight the HIV virus. After almost 1 year (48 weeks), participants leave the study and their care is provided by their country’s national health system, including provision of ARVs in line with the national programme.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Studies in rich countries have shown that taking four ARVs produces a very strong response to HIV so we want to see if taking an extra fourth ARV for the first 3 months of treatment reduces the risk of dying after people start ARVs. The risks are that there could be side-effects to this extra medicine, or that taking four medicines may be more difficult than three – if people don’t take all their ARVs all the time, the HIV virus can develop resistance to the drugs which stops them working over the longer term. The potential benefits are that the immune system may respond better both initially and over the long term if a fourth ARV is used in the first 3 months. Similarly, whilst adding other extra medicines to fight infections could reduce the risk of dying from these infections, it might also increase the risk of other side-effects, some of which can be serious, and might also make it harder to take all the ARVs. This study is designed to find out whether the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks.
Where is the study run from?
The study will enrol 1800 people in four countries: Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe. It is co-ordinated by the Medical Research Council in London (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2012 to August 2015
Who is funding the study?
The study is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Department for International Development and the Wellcome Trust (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Margaret Thomason
m.thomason@ucl.ac.uk
Contact information
Scientific
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
Aviation House
125 Kingsway
London
WC2B 6NH
United Kingdom
diana.gibb@ucl.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | 2x2x2 open-label factorial multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in four countries |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | Reduction of Early mortALITY in HIV-infected African adults and children starting antiretroviral therapy: a randomised controlled trial |
Study acronym | REALITY |
Study objectives | To identify effective, safe and acceptable interventions to reduce early mortality in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and older children (5 years or more) initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). Hypotheses: 1. Addition of 12 weeks of an integrase inihibitor (raltegravir) to initial antiretroviral therapy will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care first-line 3-drug 2-class ART. 2. Addition of enhanced OI prophylaxis with immediate isoniazid/pyridoxine (and cotrimoxazole), 12 weeks fluconazole, plus single-dose albendazole and 5 days of azithromycin at ART initiation, will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care cotrimoxazole prophylaxis plus continuation of any pre-existing prophylaxis (i.e. only starting cotrimoxazole) for the first 12 weeks followed by isoniazid prophylaxis from 12 weeks onwards. 3. Supplementation with Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care nutritional support to those with poor nutritional status according to local guidelines |
Ethics approval(s) | Ethical approval was granted by the appropriate national ethics committees in Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe as well as University College London Ethics Committee (UK) |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) |
Intervention | Three methods to reduce early mortality following antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation: 1. Increasing the potency of ART with a 12 week induction period using 4 antiretroviral drugs from 3 classes 2. Augmented prophylaxis against opportunistic/bacterial infections and helminths for 12 weeks 3. Macronutrient intervention using ready-to-use supplementary food for 12 weeks Each intervention will be compared with standard care, which in previously untreated patients presenting late with very low CD4 counts is to initiate ART with 3 drugs from 2 classes, together with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and macronutrient intervention only for those with low BMI (or low weight-for-height/mid-upper arm circumference in children). |
Intervention type | Drug |
Pharmaceutical study type(s) | |
Phase | Phase III |
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Albendazole, azithromycin, cotrimoxazole, fluconazole, isoniazid, pyridoxine, raltegravir |
Primary outcome measure | Mortality over the first 24 weeks after starting anti-retroviral therapy |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Mortality in 48 weeks after starting anti-retroviral therapy 2. Safety: 2.1. Serious adverse events 2.2. Grade 4 adverse events 2.3. Adverse events leading to modification of ART or other study drugs 3. Endpoints relating to the specific mechanisms of action of each intervention 3.1. Anti-HIV: CD4 levels 3.2. Anti-infection: incidence of tuberculosis, cryptococcal and candida disease, severe bacterial infections 3.3. Nutritional: body mass index (BMI), weight and body fat assessed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA), height (in children), grip strength 4. Hospital inpatient episodes and total days admitted 5. Adherence to ART and acceptability of each strategy measured by pill counts and questionnaire |
Overall study start date | 01/09/2012 |
Completion date | 31/08/2015 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Mixed |
Lower age limit | 5 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 1800 |
Total final enrolment | 1805 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged 5 years or older (the lower age limit is because CD4 counts are less reliable predictors of immunodeficiency under 5 years: CD4 counts are recommended by WHO guidelines in older children) 2. Documented HIV infection by HIV ELISA 3. Naive to ART except for drugs given or received to prevent mother-to-child transmission 4. CD4 T-cell count <100 cells/mm3 on blood test taken at screening for REALITY 5. Results of screening haematology and biochemistry tests available 6. Patient/carer provide informed consent (and children <18 years assent, as appropriate according to their age and knowledge of HIV status) |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Contraindications to any proposed antiretroviral drugs (including integrase inhibitors), isoniazid, fluconazole, albendazole or azithromycin 2. Pregnant or breastfeeding or intending to become pregnant during the first 12 weeks of the study |
Date of first enrolment | 18/06/2013 |
Date of final enrolment | 10/04/2015 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Kenya
- Malawi
- Uganda
- Zimbabwe
Study participating centres
-
Uganda
-
Uganda
-
Uganda
-
Uganda
-
Zimbabwe
Blantyre
-
Malawi
-
Kenya
-
Kenya
Sponsor information
Research council
2nd Floor, David Phillips Building
Polaris House
North Star Avenue
Swindon
SN2 1FL
United Kingdom
Website | http://www.mrc.ac.uk/ |
---|---|
https://ror.org/03x94j517 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
Publication and dissemination plan | Not provided at time of registration |
IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | 20/07/2017 | Yes | No | ||
Results article | 01/05/2018 | Yes | No | ||
Results article | 04/12/2018 | Yes | No | ||
Results article | 04/03/2018 | 01/10/2019 | Yes | No | |
Results article | 04/03/2018 | 01/10/2019 | Yes | No | |
Other publications | Calprotectin as a biomarker | 27/11/2020 | 21/12/2020 | Yes | No |
Other publications | Biomarkers of mortality | 28/06/2024 | 01/07/2024 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
01/07/2024: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
21/12/2020: Publication reference added.
01/10/2019: Publication references added.
05/12/2018: Publication reference added.
16/04/2018: Publication reference added.
25/07/2017: Publication reference added.