Reduction of early mortality in HIV-infected African adults and children starting antiretroviral therapy

ISRCTN ISRCTN43622374
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN43622374
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01825031
Secondary identifying numbers G1100693
Submission date
28/09/2011
Registration date
18/10/2011
Last edited
01/07/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
At the moment, there is no cure for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, but there are medicines called anti-retrovirals (ARVs) that can control HIV and keep people well for a long time. Unfortunately in many African countries patients only come for treatment when they are very sick and HIV has already had a big effect on their bodies. Often patients have malnutrition, diarrhoea, infections such as tuberculosis, serious lung infections (pneumonia) and other severe infections. This means that many more people die during the first 3 months after starting ARVs compared to richer countries. The aim of this study is to find out whether or not giving extra treatments during the first 3 months of taking ARVs will help sick people with HIV and prevent some of them from dying early, or whether giving extra treatments doesn’t make any difference and makes it harder to take ARVs. The extra treatments are:
1. An extra ARV drug added to the three standard ARVs (i.e., four ARVs in total)
2. A single pill containing cotrimoxazole (septrin) and isoniazid (to fight TB), plus fluconazole (to fight thrush) and azithromycin (to fight bacterial infections) and albendazole (to kill worms). All of these are medicines which fight against common infections in sick people with HIV
3. Extra food supplements to provide high energy food

Who can participate?
People aged 5 years and older who are HIV positive and also have low immunity measured by a blood test called the CD4 count, and therefore have a higher risk of getting sick.

What does the study involve?
Participants receive three ARVs and cotrimoxazole, together with any other medicines they are already taking or need for treatment of any infections. In addition, they are randomly allocated to receive or not receive each of the three extra treatments (ARVs, medicines to fight other infections, and nutritional supplements) for the first 3 months. After the first 3 months they continue to take three standard ARVs to fight HIV, cotrimoxazole (septrin) to help to protect against infections long-term, and isoniazid to protect against TB. Participants have regular clinic visits to see a nurse and a doctor and blood samples are taken to check for any side effects of the medicines. They are followed carefully for any side effects and responses to the treatments. Some of the blood is used to work out how much of the ARVs are actually getting into their blood where they can fight the HIV virus. After almost 1 year (48 weeks), participants leave the study and their care is provided by their country’s national health system, including provision of ARVs in line with the national programme.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Studies in rich countries have shown that taking four ARVs produces a very strong response to HIV so we want to see if taking an extra fourth ARV for the first 3 months of treatment reduces the risk of dying after people start ARVs. The risks are that there could be side-effects to this extra medicine, or that taking four medicines may be more difficult than three – if people don’t take all their ARVs all the time, the HIV virus can develop resistance to the drugs which stops them working over the longer term. The potential benefits are that the immune system may respond better both initially and over the long term if a fourth ARV is used in the first 3 months. Similarly, whilst adding other extra medicines to fight infections could reduce the risk of dying from these infections, it might also increase the risk of other side-effects, some of which can be serious, and might also make it harder to take all the ARVs. This study is designed to find out whether the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks.

Where is the study run from?
The study will enrol 1800 people in four countries: Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe. It is co-ordinated by the Medical Research Council in London (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2012 to August 2015

Who is funding the study?
The study is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Department for International Development and the Wellcome Trust (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Margaret Thomason
m.thomason@ucl.ac.uk

Contact information

Prof Diana Gibb
Scientific

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
Aviation House
125 Kingsway
London
WC2B 6NH
United Kingdom

Email diana.gibb@ucl.ac.uk

Study information

Study design2x2x2 open-label factorial multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in four countries
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleReduction of Early mortALITY in HIV-infected African adults and children starting antiretroviral therapy: a randomised controlled trial
Study acronymREALITY
Study objectivesTo identify effective, safe and acceptable interventions to reduce early mortality in HIV-infected adults, adolescents, and older children (5 years or more) initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Hypotheses:
1. Addition of 12 weeks of an integrase inihibitor (raltegravir) to initial antiretroviral therapy will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care first-line 3-drug 2-class ART.
2. Addition of enhanced OI prophylaxis with immediate isoniazid/pyridoxine (and cotrimoxazole), 12 weeks fluconazole, plus single-dose albendazole and 5 days of azithromycin at ART initiation, will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care cotrimoxazole prophylaxis plus continuation of any pre-existing prophylaxis (i.e. only starting cotrimoxazole) for the first 12 weeks followed by isoniazid prophylaxis from 12 weeks onwards.
3. Supplementation with Ready-to-Use Supplementary Food (RUSF) will reduce mortality, compared to standard of care nutritional support to those with poor nutritional status according to local guidelines
Ethics approval(s)Ethical approval was granted by the appropriate national ethics committees in Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe as well as University College London Ethics Committee (UK)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
InterventionThree methods to reduce early mortality following antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation:
1. Increasing the potency of ART with a 12 week induction period using 4 antiretroviral drugs from 3 classes
2. Augmented prophylaxis against opportunistic/bacterial infections and helminths for 12 weeks
3. Macronutrient intervention using ready-to-use supplementary food for 12 weeks

Each intervention will be compared with standard care, which in previously untreated patients presenting late with very low CD4 counts is to initiate ART with 3 drugs from 2 classes, together with cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and macronutrient intervention only for those with low BMI (or low weight-for-height/mid-upper arm circumference in children).
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Albendazole, azithromycin, cotrimoxazole, fluconazole, isoniazid, pyridoxine, raltegravir
Primary outcome measureMortality over the first 24 weeks after starting anti-retroviral therapy
Secondary outcome measures1. Mortality in 48 weeks after starting anti-retroviral therapy
2. Safety:
2.1. Serious adverse events
2.2. Grade 4 adverse events
2.3. Adverse events leading to modification of ART or other study drugs
3. Endpoints relating to the specific mechanisms of action of each intervention
3.1. Anti-HIV: CD4 levels
3.2. Anti-infection: incidence of tuberculosis, cryptococcal and candida disease, severe bacterial infections
3.3. Nutritional: body mass index (BMI), weight and body fat assessed by bioimpedance analysis (BIA), height (in children), grip strength
4. Hospital inpatient episodes and total days admitted
5. Adherence to ART and acceptability of each strategy measured by pill counts and questionnaire
Overall study start date01/09/2012
Completion date31/08/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit5 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants1800
Total final enrolment1805
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 5 years or older (the lower age limit is because CD4 counts are less reliable predictors of immunodeficiency under 5 years: CD4 counts are recommended by WHO guidelines in older children)
2. Documented HIV infection by HIV ELISA
3. Naive to ART except for drugs given or received to prevent mother-to-child transmission
4. CD4 T-cell count <100 cells/mm3 on blood test taken at screening for REALITY
5. Results of screening haematology and biochemistry tests available
6. Patient/carer provide informed consent (and children <18 years assent, as appropriate according to their age and knowledge of HIV status)
Key exclusion criteria1. Contraindications to any proposed antiretroviral drugs (including integrase inhibitors), isoniazid, fluconazole, albendazole or azithromycin
2. Pregnant or breastfeeding or intending to become pregnant during the first 12 weeks of the study
Date of first enrolment18/06/2013
Date of final enrolment10/04/2015

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Kenya
  • Malawi
  • Uganda
  • Zimbabwe

Study participating centres

Joint Clinical Research Centre
Fort Portal
-
Uganda
Joint Clinical Research Centre
Mbarara
-
Uganda
Joint Clinical Research Centre
Mbale
-
Uganda
Joint Clinical Research Centre
Gulu
-
Uganda
University of Zimbabwe Clinical Research Centre (UZCRC)
Harare
-
Zimbabwe
University of Malawi
Department of Medicine
Blantyre
-
Malawi
Moi University Clinical Research Centre (MUCRC)
Eldoret
-
Kenya
KEMRI Wellcome Trust Centre
Kilifi
-
Kenya

Sponsor information

Medical Research Council (UK)
Research council

2nd Floor, David Phillips Building
Polaris House
North Star Avenue
Swindon
SN2 1FL
United Kingdom

Website http://www.mrc.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03x94j517

Funders

Funder type

Government

Global Health Trials Scheme [Department for International Development, Medical Research Council & Wellcome Trust] (UK) ref: G1100693/1

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 20/07/2017 Yes No
Results article 01/05/2018 Yes No
Results article 04/12/2018 Yes No
Results article 04/03/2018 01/10/2019 Yes No
Results article 04/03/2018 01/10/2019 Yes No
Other publications Calprotectin as a biomarker 27/11/2020 21/12/2020 Yes No
Other publications Biomarkers of mortality 28/06/2024 01/07/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

01/07/2024: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
21/12/2020: Publication reference added.
01/10/2019: Publication references added.
05/12/2018: Publication reference added.
16/04/2018: Publication reference added.
25/07/2017: Publication reference added.